We have a pluggable broker interceptor,
> I think we need to trigger some event as bellow:
- [ ] Client connected
- [ ] Client disconnected
- [ ] Consumer subscribe
- [ ] Consumer unsubscribe
- [ ] Producer publish
- [ ] Message delivered
- [ ] Message acked
For these events, the broker intercept
Yes, the change in the PR [1] is mainly about CI. The documentation will
also be updated that the minimum required version is 1.18 .
BR, Lari
[1] - https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/192
pe 7. tammik. 2022 klo 2.43 Sijie Guo wrote:
> Can you clarify what is the main change? I s
Hoskins355 commented on issue #188:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/188#issuecomment-1007542953
I got Libpulsar.so in usr/lib
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3084440/148573912-1e9bfce4-68e4-4d7a-9f88-edccd5d7e527.png";>
and I copied that directory in
> On Jan 6, 2022, at 4:51 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
> I believe 48 hours vote is only for PIP, which was agreed in the dev@.
I would like to understand why Matteo chose 48 hours for this process. What’s
the hurry?
In this discussion there is a mixture of discussion and +1. [1]
Did the project
Hoskins355 removed a comment on issue #188:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/188#issuecomment-1007542953
I got Libpulsar.so in usr/lib
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3084440/148573912-1e9bfce4-68e4-4d7a-9f88-edccd5d7e527.png";>
and I copied that dire
Hoskins355 commented on issue #188:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/188#issuecomment-1007669919
@ zhaoyajun2009, Thanks I got it working.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
This is very cool.
How is `ThresholdShedder` chosen - I don't see if referenced here?
https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/reference-configuration/
-F
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 7:45 PM Sijie Guo wrote:
> +1 ThresholdShedder is a much better policy
>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 6:24 AM Hang Chen wrote:
csthomas1 opened a new issue #197:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/issues/197
**Describe the bug**
The Pulsar Manager java process is being launched without the inclusion of
the "-Dlog4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true" switch, despite the fact that it
includes an older versio
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:27 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> > I believe 48 hours vote is only for PIP, which was agreed in the dev@.
>
> I would like to understand why Matteo chose 48 hours for this process. What’s
> the hurry?
Since we went from no formal process to "some" process, and since any
change
> On Jan 7, 2022, at 2:59 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:27 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>>> I believe 48 hours vote is only for PIP, which was agreed in the dev@.
>>
>> I would like to understand why Matteo chose 48 hours for this process.
>> What’s the hurry?
>
> Since we
Hi Frank,
You can configure the Load Shedding Strategy in the `broker.conf` file
using `loadBalancerLoadSheddingStrategy`.
The configuration is missing from the document you referenced--it
should be there, though.
There was a recent PR to add documentation describing the different
configuration
csthomas1 opened a new pull request #198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-helm-chart/pull/198
Fixes #197
### Motivation
Adds the -Dlog4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true switch to the pulsar manager
commandline. Necessary for pulsar manager v0.1.0, which includes
a dependenc
nicknezis opened a new pull request #438:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/pull/438
### Motivation
Details at https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/security.html
Description of CVE-2021-45105:
> Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 did not protect
Thanks for your response, Penghui.
I support simplifying message loss prevention for DLQ topics. However,
it's not clear to me why we should only simplify it for DLQ topics.
As a Pulsar user, I encountered many of the challenges you mention
when producing to auto created topics. In my architectur
> Is Functions being verified?
I discussed this a bit in PR 13376's description and comments, please
let me know if you have additional questions. I haven't done any extra
verification.
Note that since [0] is in both 2.8.x and 2.9.x, the upgrade scenario
that led us to revert the first non-root w
I noticed today that we document some Kubernetes requirements on the
website [0]. We'll need to coordinate appropriate updates to our docs,
too.
- Michael
[0] - https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/kubernetes-helm/#prerequisite
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:30 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
>
> Yes, the change
16 matches
Mail list logo
