> On Jan 6, 2022, at 4:51 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I believe 48 hours vote is only for PIP, which was agreed in the dev@.
I would like to understand why Matteo chose 48 hours for this process. What’s the hurry? In this discussion there is a mixture of discussion and +1. [1] Did the project ever actually VOTE to VOTE on PIPs, or was Lazy Consensus assumed? I don’t see any VOTE for this when I search. [2] (Also, I’m not sure what is meant by "Lazy Voting” I don’t find that defined in ASF documentation.) Regards, Dave [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/m8dr0hz7qn7rkd48bcp430lcq2q3674g [2] https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@pulsar.apache.org:lte=1y:[VOTE] > > For other activities, this project follows the ASF 72 hours rule. > > - Sijie > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 8:17 PM Dave Fisher <wave4d...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> Yes please! I did not notice that. >> >> Personally I would be ok with 72 hours lazy consensus, but if we must vote >> then 72 hours is a minimum. >> >> Thanks, >> Dave >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Jan 3, 2022, at 8:10 PM, Haiting Jiang <jianghait...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Dave, >>> >>> The "48 hours" rule is on [1]. >>> Maybe we should update the wiki and PIP template first? >>> >>> [1] >> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Pulsar-Improvement-Proposal-%28PIP%29 >>> >>>> On 2022/01/04 03:59:45 Dave Fisher wrote: >>>> The ASF considers that the minimum time for a vote is 72 hours for a >> few reasons particularly: >>>> >>>> (1) to allow the world to spin. People are in most time zones. >>>> (2) to allow for weekends. >>>> (3) to allow time for contributors who are not working full time on the >> project. >>>> >>>> Many projects use a 7 day vote. >>>> >>>> We just had 2 PIP votes called for 48 hours so this rule is worth >> reiterating! >>>> >>>> All the best, >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Haiting Jiang >> >>
