Rajan,
I can pick up
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/9644 Replace local ZooKeeper and
cache access from PulsarService and replace with Metadata-store API
can you please assign the issue to me ?
Enrico
Il giorno sab 20 feb 2021 alle ore 01:15 Rajan Dhabalia <
rdhaba...@apache.org> ha scri
Thank you guys.
I am clean up the PRs which are marked with the label `release/2.7.1`.
If you have PR which marked the `release/2.7.1`, please take a look
and make it merged as soon as possible, otherwise, it will be pushed
into the next release.
Thanks for your help!
Yong Zhang
On Mon, 22 Feb 2
That's kind reminder, thank you Yong~
Best Regards,
Jennifer
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:59 PM Yong Zhang
wrote:
> Thank you guys.
>
> I am clean up the PRs which are marked with the label `release/2.7.1`.
> If you have PR which marked the `release/2.7.1`, please take a look
> and make it merged
Hi all,
Apologized that I didn't send out the summary.
The meeting minutes can be found at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19dXkVXeU2q_nHmkG8zURjKnYlvD96TbKf5KjYyASsOE/edit#
I forgot to record the 2/16 meeting. So no recording for 2/16 meeting.
The 2/18 meeting can be found at
https://github
Hi,
Currently, the python pulsar client couples function API together with
Pub/Sub API. That means the python client pulls in a lot of unnecessary
dependencies for people who only use pub/sub API.
As discussed in the community meeting last week, I am starting an email
thread for discussing it. I
+1
- Verified the checksum
- Ran producer and consumer
Same as Masahiro, the public key of gpg is not there. Maybe need to upload
the public key
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 2:24 PM Masahiro Sakamoto
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified the checksum
> - Ran producer and consumer
>
> However, I also
Hello,
we have merged a change to the Pulsar Builder image in order to allow
builds to JDK11 (the default is still JDK8)
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9609
Can you please publish the new image to Dockerhub ?
The new image also contains:
- Python 3 runtime (together with Python 2.7)
- Upgr
Hi long:
That's so cool! +1
Best regards
Ran
On 2021/02/09 05:46:48, xiaolong ran wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.4.0, as
> follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comme
iamrmin commented on issue #93:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/93#issuecomment-783534180
Client in-general. also an option to bind event in case of connection
interruption.
This is an automated mes
iamrmin opened a new issue #141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/141
It would be great to have a callback at Client level that trigger if
connection break in-between.
This is an automated message fro
Hi Sijie,
Are you referring to the fact that the Pulsar python package (wheel
package) includes both pub/sub API and the function API? I If so, why are
there a lot of dependencies being pulled in? For Pulsar Python Functions,
shouldn't only the following files be pulled into the python package?
IIUC, its because of the various state store related dependencies that are
polluting this?
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:48 AM Jerry Peng
wrote:
> [ External sender. Exercise caution. ]
>
> Hi Sijie,
>
> Are you referring to the fact that the Pulsar python package (wheel
> package) includes both pu
Yes, there are a bunch of dependencies that are only needed for state
store, such as the bk state store client and everything it's pulling
in, with the biggest offender being GRPC client lib.
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:59 AM Sanjeev Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> IIUC, its because of the
I have pushed the new image to "apachepulsar/pulsar-build:ubuntu-16.04"
-Ali
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 5:05 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hello,
> we have merged a change to the Pulsar Builder image in order to allow
> builds to JDK11 (the default is still JDK8)
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/p
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Feb 22, 2021, 11:34 PM +0800, ran leon , wrote:
> Hi long:
>
> That's so cool! +1
>
> Best regards
>
> Ran
>
>
> On 2021/02/09 05:46:48, xiaolong ran wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.4.0,
> > as foll
+1 (binding)
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:03 PM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
> Penghui
> On Feb 22, 2021, 11:34 PM +0800, ran leon , wrote:
> > Hi long:
> >
> > That's so cool! +1
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Ran
> >
> >
> > On 2021/02/09 05:46:48, xiaolong ran w
Matteo - Thank you for providing the context!
Yes. It is related to gRPC pulled by the state requirements.
- Sijie
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:03 PM Matteo Merli
wrote:
> Yes, there are a bunch of dependencies that are only needed for state
> store, such as the bk state store client and everyth
+1
On 2021/02/09 05:46:48, xiaolong ran wrote:
> Hi everyone,>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.4.0, as
> follows:>
> [ ] +1, Approve the release>
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)>
>
> This is the first release ca
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Guangning
丛搏 于2021年2月23日周二 上午9:50写道：
> +1
>
> On 2021/02/09 05:46:48, xiaolong ran wrote:
> > Hi everyone,>
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> 0.4.0, as follows:>
> > [ ] +1, Approve the release>
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the rele
Looks like the new image broken the CPP build.
I will try to use the old Dockerfile to build the
"apache/pulsar/pulsar-build" image
to make sure our CI back to normal.
Here is the issue: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/9682
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 05:08, Ali Ahmed wrote:
> I have pushed
20 matches
Mail list logo
