Matteo - Thank you for providing the context! Yes. It is related to gRPC pulled by the state requirements.
- Sijie On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:03 PM Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, there are a bunch of dependencies that are only needed for state > store, such as the bk state store client and everything it's pulling > in, with the biggest offender being GRPC client lib. > > > -- > Matteo Merli > <matteo.me...@gmail.com> > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:59 AM Sanjeev Kulkarni > <sanje...@splunk.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > IIUC, its because of the various state store related dependencies that > are > > polluting this? > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:48 AM Jerry Peng <jerry.boyang.p...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > [ External sender. Exercise caution. ] > > > > > > Hi Sijie, > > > > > > Are you referring to the fact that the Pulsar python package (wheel > > > package) includes both pub/sub API and the function API? I If so, why > are > > > there a lot of dependencies being pulled in? For Pulsar Python > Functions, > > > shouldn't only the following files be pulled into the python package? > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/master/pulsar-client-cpp/python/pulsar/functions > > > > > > > > > It is a minimal set of files. Is the problem you are describing stating > > > that users wanting to just run Python Functions having to install a > package > > > that also includes the pub/sub API and the Python client? And it would > be > > > better for users that just want to run Python Functions to not have to > also > > > install the python client? > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Jerry > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 1:19 AM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> Currently, the python pulsar client couples function API together with > > >> Pub/Sub API. That means the python client pulls in a lot of > unnecessary > > >> dependencies for people who only use pub/sub API. > > >> > > >> As discussed in the community meeting last week, I am starting an > email > > >> thread for discussing it. I would like to learn what @Sanjeev Kulkarni > > >> <sanje...@splunk.com> and @Jerry Peng <jer...@splunk.com> think > about it. > > >> > > >> - Sijie > > >> > > > >
