Re: [DISCUSS] [Transaction] Clear namespace backlog can't clear system topic and system sub backlog.

2022-01-25 Thread Michael Marshall
022 at 14:46, Michael Marshall wrote: > > > This is a really important thread. I think our system topic design > > needs more definition, structure, and documentation. Thanks for > > starting the thread, Bo Cong. > > > > > If the user uses it, it means that the u

Re: [DISCUSS] [Transaction] Clear namespace backlog can't clear system topic and system sub backlog.

2022-01-23 Thread mattison chao
e user uses it, it means that the user has considered the result of > the clear system sub backlog > > I think we need to discuss authorization for operating on system > topics, especially when topic level policies are not enabled. > > From reading the PIP [0], it looks like we alr

Re: [DISCUSS] [Transaction] Clear namespace backlog can't clear system topic and system sub backlog.

2022-01-22 Thread Michael Marshall
This is a really important thread. I think our system topic design needs more definition, structure, and documentation. Thanks for starting the thread, Bo Cong. > If the user uses it, it means that the user has considered the result of the > clear system sub backlog I think we need to d

Re: [DISCUSS] [Transaction] Clear namespace backlog can't clear system topic and system sub backlog.

2022-01-13 Thread PengHui Li
g NAMESPACE_EVENTS_LOCAL_NAME = > "__change_events"; > > /** > * Local topic name for the transaction buffer snapshot. > */ > public static final String TRANSACTION_BUFFER_SNAPSHOT = > "__transaction_buffer_snapshot"; > > publi

[DISCUSS] [Transaction] Clear namespace backlog can't clear system topic and system sub backlog.

2022-01-13 Thread 丛搏
ange_events"; /** * Local topic name for the transaction buffer snapshot. */ public static final String TRANSACTION_BUFFER_SNAPSHOT = "__transaction_buffer_snapshot"; public static final String SUBSCRIPTION_NAME = "transaction-buffer-sub"; ``` User only want to clear th

sub

2021-06-15 Thread ??552356...@qq.com

Re: [Discuss] Separate Function API from Pub/Sub API for python client

2021-02-22 Thread Sijie Guo
e > > polluting this? > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:48 AM Jerry Peng > > > wrote: > > > > > [ External sender. Exercise caution. ] > > > > > > Hi Sijie, > > > > > > Are you referring to the fact that the P

Re: [Discuss] Separate Function API from Pub/Sub API for python client

2021-02-22 Thread Matteo Merli
ause of the various state store related dependencies that are > polluting this? > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:48 AM Jerry Peng > wrote: > > > [ External sender. Exercise caution. ] > > > > Hi Sijie, > > > > Are you referring to the fact that the Pulsar

Re: [Discuss] Separate Function API from Pub/Sub API for python client

2021-02-22 Thread Sanjeev Kulkarni
age) includes both pub/sub API and the function API? I If so, why are > there a lot of dependencies being pulled in? For Pulsar Python Functions, > shouldn't only the following files be pulled into the python package? > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/master/pul

Re: [Discuss] Separate Function API from Pub/Sub API for python client

2021-02-22 Thread Jerry Peng
Hi Sijie, Are you referring to the fact that the Pulsar python package (wheel package) includes both pub/sub API and the function API? I If so, why are there a lot of dependencies being pulled in? For Pulsar Python Functions, shouldn't only the following files be pulled into the python pa

[Discuss] Separate Function API from Pub/Sub API for python client

2021-02-22 Thread Sijie Guo
Hi, Currently, the python pulsar client couples function API together with Pub/Sub API. That means the python client pulls in a lot of unnecessary dependencies for people who only use pub/sub API. As discussed in the community meeting last week, I am starting an email thread for discussing it. I