Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-21 Thread Sijie Guo
Thanks Maurice. I think we didn't have discussed plans on schedule in the community. So the release schedule is a bit loose and not in time. We can probably think about adopting time based release plan as what Kafka and BookKeeper are doing. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Time+B

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-21 Thread Maurice Barnum
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:19 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > Maybe we can go ahead without node client for this release. If we can > I suggest taking a strong stand: release on schedule unless there are regressions from the previous release. If new features aren't done or are buggy, kick them to the next

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-20 Thread Sijie Guo
eleasing pulsar-client-node in the release process. If not, we > > move it to the next release (either 2.5.0 or 2.4.1). > > > > I think so too. > > > > Regards, > > Nozomi > > ____ > > 差出人: Sijie Guo > > 送信日時: 2019

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-20 Thread PengHui Li
think so too. > > Regards, > Nozomi > > 差出人: Sijie Guo > 送信日時: 2019年6月11日 20:18 > 宛先: Dev > 件名: Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion > > Nozomi, > > Thank you for your updates. > > It seems that it still takes time to complete the documentation and test

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-11 Thread Nozomi Kurihara
next release (either 2.5.0 or 2.4.1). I think so too. Regards, Nozomi 差出人: Sijie Guo 送信日時: 2019年6月11日 20:18 宛先: Dev 件名: Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion Nozomi, Thank you for your updates. It seems that it still takes time to complete the documentation and tests

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-11 Thread Sijie Guo
r, consumer, ...) > * Unit test > > NOT YET: > > * publishing the library to npm registry > * Documentation > * CI/CD(Jenkins) > > Regards, > Nozomi > ____________ > 差出人: Sijie Guo > 送信日時: 2019年6月11日 13:18 > 宛先: Dev > 件名:

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-11 Thread Nozomi Kurihara
宛先: Dev 件名: Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion Penghui, I tried to ping those issues to see if they can be moved to 2.5.0. Please check those issues. Also since we have pulsar-client-node repo, is pulsar-client-node in a good shape for releasing an official node client? - Sijie On Mon, Jun 10,

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-10 Thread Sijie Guo
Penghui, I tried to ping those issues to see if they can be moved to 2.5.0. Please check those issues. Also since we have pulsar-client-node repo, is pulsar-client-node in a good shape for releasing an official node client? - Sijie On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:34 AM PengHui Li wrote: > Hi all >