Re: [DISCUSS] Proceeding with PIP-62 plan, before Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 is released

2022-03-30 Thread Lari Hotari
Is there a plan to make progress with the Trino PR https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/8020 which would replace Pulsar SQL? Pulsar SQL is not compatibile with Java 11.0.14.1 since Presto 332 fails to parse this type of version string. That issue is reported as https://github.com/apache/pulsar

Re: [DISCUSS] Proceeding with PIP-62 plan, before Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 is released

2021-12-23 Thread Michael Marshall
I think I misunderstood the current state of PIP 62. Once we clarify the plan, it'd be helpful to update the wiki. Thanks, Michael On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 2:43 AM Lari Hotari wrote: > > > I believe we want to keep SQL until the code change lands in Trino. > Because > there are still users usin

Re: [DISCUSS] Proceeding with PIP-62 plan, before Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 is released

2021-12-23 Thread Lari Hotari
> I believe we want to keep SQL until the code change lands in Trino. Because there are still users using this component. There have been multiple public dev@pulsar.apache.org discussions about PIP-62 which was initialized in April 2020. Those users using Pulsar SQL can keep on using Pulsar 2.8.x

Re: [DISCUSS] Proceeding with PIP-62 plan, before Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 is released

2021-12-23 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Sijie, > Sorry. When you say "we discussed", who are "we"? Is it DataStax? There have been discussions on the ML and we discussed this also in Community meetings. So "we" is this community > I believe we want to keep SQL until the code change lands in Trino. Because > there are still users using t

Re: [DISCUSS] Proceeding with PIP-62 plan, before Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 is released

2021-12-22 Thread Michael Marshall
> I am volunteering to making the changes as per the PIP-62 plan. I think Lari is proposing to complete the work to move the Pulsar SQL code base to the repositories defined in PIP 62. Assuming that is what he meant, I am +1 on completing that now. Based on reading through the mailing list thread

Re: [DISCUSS] Proceeding with PIP-62 plan, before Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 is released

2021-12-22 Thread Sijie Guo
Sorry. When you say "we discussed", who are "we"? Is it DataStax? I believe we want to keep SQL until the code change lands in Trino. Because there are still users using this component. - Sijie On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 11:34 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Lari, > > Il giorno mer 22 dic 2021 alle o

Re: [DISCUSS] Proceeding with PIP-62 plan, before Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 is released

2021-12-21 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Lari, Il giorno mer 22 dic 2021 alle ore 08:31 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > Dear Pulsar community members, > > PIP-62[1], "PIP 62: Move connectors, adapters and Pulsar Presto to separate > repositories" was created in April 2020. The repositories for > pulsar-connectors, pulsar-adapters and pulsar-