I think I misunderstood the current state of PIP 62. Once we clarify the plan, it'd be helpful to update the wiki.
Thanks, Michael On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 2:43 AM Lari Hotari <l...@hotari.net> wrote: > > > I believe we want to keep SQL until the code change lands in Trino. > Because > there are still users using this component. > > There have been multiple public dev@pulsar.apache.org discussions about > PIP-62 which was initialized in April 2020. > Those users using Pulsar SQL can keep on using Pulsar 2.8.x or 2.9.x until > the feature is available in Trino. Isn't that a viable option? > > The Pulsar community is here to help with the work. What is the status of > Trino work? Are there tasks that need help? Is there any ETA for the > landing of code in Trino? > Could we resolve this together? > > BR, Lari > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 2:39 AM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sorry. When you say "we discussed", who are "we"? Is it DataStax? > > > > I believe we want to keep SQL until the code change lands in Trino. Because > > there are still users using this component. > > > > - Sijie > > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 11:34 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Lari, > > > > > > Il giorno mer 22 dic 2021 alle ore 08:31 Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org > > > > > > ha scritto: > > > > > > > Dear Pulsar community members, > > > > > > > > PIP-62[1], "PIP 62: Move connectors, adapters and Pulsar Presto to > > > separate > > > > repositories" was created in April 2020. The repositories for > > > > pulsar-connectors, pulsar-adapters and pulsar-sql were created about a > > > year > > > > ago [2]. > > > > > > > > I'd like to propose that we continue with the PIP-62 plan asap, before > > > > Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 is released. > > > > > > > > I'm also suggesting that we drop Pulsar SQL from apache/pulsar without > > > > waiting for the Trino Pulsar PR [3] being completed. > > > > > > > > I am volunteering to making the changes as per the PIP-62 plan. > > > > When can we proceed with the plan? Do we need an explicit vote on the > > > > mailing list about this? > > > > > > > > > > We discussed this many times in the past year. > > > I believe that there is no need to wait > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > > > > > Lari > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-62%3A-Move-connectors%2C-adapters-and-Pulsar-Presto-to-separate-repositories > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9e6ec742e2896da1f0ce7d4adc7cb84fc6db6dbf797732ccdd50fb86%40%3Cdev.pulsar.apache.org%3E > > > > [3] https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/8020 > > > > > > > > Other email threads: > > > > * [Discuss] Don't include presto/trino in the normal Pulsar > > distribution > > > - > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/jn96tct54mn0tvdot62vdslrvs38fm6d > > > > * Updates on Presto connector for PIP-62 - > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/f9n6sc2mrboq5sxhjbr7gvdl8vqp9fpk > > > > > > > > >
