Sijie, > Sorry. When you say "we discussed", who are "we"? Is it DataStax? There have been discussions on the ML and we discussed this also in Community meetings. So "we" is this community
> I believe we want to keep SQL until the code change lands in Trino. Because > there are still users using this component. If we don't want to remove Presto then we have to at least move to the latest version, that requires JDK11. My understanding is that Lari is willing to help in completing this work. When we discussed this, probably something like 1 year ago, Lari did not have write permissions and he could not help. There is not only Presto, we had to move all the Connectors and so change the build process for the Pulsar "-all" docker image We can defer Presto and move forward with the Connectors Enrico Il giorno gio 23 dic 2021 alle ore 06:34 Michael Marshall < mmarsh...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > I am volunteering to making the changes as per the PIP-62 plan. > > I think Lari is proposing to complete the work to move the > Pulsar SQL code base to the repositories defined in PIP 62. > > Assuming that is what he meant, I am +1 on completing that now. > Based on reading through the mailing list threads Lari referenced, we > delayed moving the code base to the other repos with the hope that > contributing the code to Trino/Presto would be done before the 2.8.0 > release. I think we should move forward with the initial PIP instead > of waiting for the Trino PR to get merged. > > - Michael > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 6:39 PM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Sorry. When you say "we discussed", who are "we"? Is it DataStax? > > > > I believe we want to keep SQL until the code change lands in Trino. > Because > > there are still users using this component. > > > > - Sijie > > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 11:34 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Lari, > > > > > > Il giorno mer 22 dic 2021 alle ore 08:31 Lari Hotari < > lhot...@apache.org> > > > ha scritto: > > > > > > > Dear Pulsar community members, > > > > > > > > PIP-62[1], "PIP 62: Move connectors, adapters and Pulsar Presto to > > > separate > > > > repositories" was created in April 2020. The repositories for > > > > pulsar-connectors, pulsar-adapters and pulsar-sql were created about > a > > > year > > > > ago [2]. > > > > > > > > I'd like to propose that we continue with the PIP-62 plan asap, > before > > > > Apache Pulsar 2.10.0 is released. > > > > > > > > I'm also suggesting that we drop Pulsar SQL from apache/pulsar > without > > > > waiting for the Trino Pulsar PR [3] being completed. > > > > > > > > I am volunteering to making the changes as per the PIP-62 plan. > > > > When can we proceed with the plan? Do we need an explicit vote on the > > > > mailing list about this? > > > > > > > > > > We discussed this many times in the past year. > > > I believe that there is no need to wait > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > > > > > Lari > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-62%3A-Move-connectors%2C-adapters-and-Pulsar-Presto-to-separate-repositories > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9e6ec742e2896da1f0ce7d4adc7cb84fc6db6dbf797732ccdd50fb86%40%3Cdev.pulsar.apache.org%3E > > > > [3] https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/8020 > > > > > > > > Other email threads: > > > > * [Discuss] Don't include presto/trino in the normal Pulsar > distribution > > > - > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/jn96tct54mn0tvdot62vdslrvs38fm6d > > > > * Updates on Presto connector for PIP-62 - > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/f9n6sc2mrboq5sxhjbr7gvdl8vqp9fpk > > > > > > > >
