Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-21 Thread Sijie Guo
Thanks Maurice. I think we didn't have discussed plans on schedule in the community. So the release schedule is a bit loose and not in time. We can probably think about adopting time based release plan as what Kafka and BookKeeper are doing. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Time+B

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-21 Thread Maurice Barnum
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:19 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > Maybe we can go ahead without node client for this release. If we can > I suggest taking a strong stand: release on schedule unless there are regressions from the previous release. If new features aren't done or are buggy, kick them to the next

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-20 Thread Sijie Guo
eleasing pulsar-client-node in the release process. If not, we > > move it to the next release (either 2.5.0 or 2.4.1). > > > > I think so too. > > > > Regards, > > Nozomi > > ____ > > 差出人: Sijie Guo > > 送信日時: 2019

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-20 Thread PengHui Li
think so too. > > Regards, > Nozomi > > 差出人: Sijie Guo > 送信日時: 2019年6月11日 20:18 > 宛先: Dev > 件名: Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion > > Nozomi, > > Thank you for your updates. > > It seems that it still takes time to complete the documentation and test

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-11 Thread Nozomi Kurihara
next release (either 2.5.0 or 2.4.1). I think so too. Regards, Nozomi 差出人: Sijie Guo 送信日時: 2019年6月11日 20:18 宛先: Dev 件名: Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion Nozomi, Thank you for your updates. It seems that it still takes time to complete the documentation and tests

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-11 Thread Sijie Guo
r, consumer, ...) > * Unit test > > NOT YET: > > * publishing the library to npm registry > * Documentation > * CI/CD(Jenkins) > > Regards, > Nozomi > ________ > 差出人: Sijie Guo > 送信日時: 2019年6月11日 13:18 > 宛先: Dev > 件名:

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-11 Thread Nozomi Kurihara
宛先: Dev 件名: Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion Penghui, I tried to ping those issues to see if they can be moved to 2.5.0. Please check those issues. Also since we have pulsar-client-node repo, is pulsar-client-node in a good shape for releasing an official node client? - Sijie On Mon, Jun 10,

Re: Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-10 Thread Sijie Guo
Penghui, I tried to ping those issues to see if they can be moved to 2.5.0. Please check those issues. Also since we have pulsar-client-node repo, is pulsar-client-node in a good shape for releasing an official node client? - Sijie On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:34 AM PengHui Li wrote: > Hi all >

Pulsar 2.4.0 Release Discussion

2019-06-09 Thread PengHui Li
Hi all I am planning to start the 2.4.0 release soon (probably next week). I would like to check the current status for the in-progress features, to see what need to be merged and included in 2.4.0. Here is the list of items still in progress. Can the owner confirm if we should include them in 2.4