EOL timeline: https://endoflife.date/oracle-jdk
* [4] NewRelic report on Java ecosystem
https://newrelic.com/resources/report/2024-state-of-the-java-ecosystem
--
Matteo Merli
+1 binding
* Checked signatures
* Compiled
* Ran standalone and perf client on mac
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 1:24 PM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Hello Apache Pulsar Community,
>
> This is a call for the vote to release the Apache Pulsar version
> 3.0.10 based on 3.0.10
+1 binding
* Checked signatures
* Compiled
* Ran standalone and perf client on mac
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 6:55 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Hello Apache Pulsar Community,
>
> This is a call for the vote to release the Apache Pulsar version 3.3.5
> based on 3.3.5
+1 binding
* Checked signatures
* Compiled
* Ran standalone and perf client on mac
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 6:00 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Hello Apache Pulsar Community,
>
> This is a call for the vote to release the Apache Pulsar version 4.0.3
> based on 4.0.3
+1
* Checked checksums
* Compiled on Mac
* Verified perf producer & consumer
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 7:15 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
> This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar Client C++, version
> 3.X.0.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https:
+1
* Checked signatures
* Checked standalone and produce/consume
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 10:09 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Checked the signature of the binary release artifacts
> - Start Pulsar standalone
> - Verified Produce and Consume
>
+1
* Checked signatures
* Checked standalone and produce/consume
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 9:12 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Checked the signature of the binary release artifacts
> - Start Pulsar standalone
> - Verified Produce and Consume
>
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 5:03 PM Rajan Dhabalia wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Rajan
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 9:36 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to start the voting thread for PIP-384: ManagedLedger
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 4:53 PM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to start the voting thread for PIP-379: Key_Shared Draining
> Hashes for Improved Message Ordering
>
> Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23309
> Rendered PIP docu
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:07 PM Apurva Telang
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-337: SSL Factory Plugin to
> customize SSL Context and SSL Engine generation
>
> PIP link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/2201
Hi Apurva,
Thanks for applying the changes to the proposal.
It looks good and given the time since it was already created, please feel
free to move to a vote at any time.
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 8:35 PM Apurva Telang
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I had submitted PIP-
nd brokers running in different major
versions
will always be guaranteed, when using the lowest common denominator of
supported features.
---
[1]: PIP-175 https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15966
--
Matteo Merli
The plan looks great.
I’d add one more item for consideration: using WithX() methods instead of
a strict for configurations:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/issues/68
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 5:38 AM Zike Yang wrote:
> Hi, everyone
>
> The Pulsar Go Cli
Closing this vote with 4 binding and 4 non-binding +1s
Binding +1s:
* Lari
* Mattison
* PengHui
* Matteo
Non-Binding +1s:
* Dao Jun
* Apurva
* Asaf
* Zixuan
Thanks,
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:54 PM Zixuan Liu wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
ht up
in PIP-346, since we could have a `broker-defaults.conf` file and a
`broker.conf` with just few overrides, plus removing the
`apply-config-from-env.py` script.
We should also do this for BookKeeper though, otherwise it won't be as
useful.
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11
PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22178
WIP PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22179
--
Matteo Merli
I have updated the proposal (and the WIP PR) based on the very helpful
feedback received. I will start a VOTE thread for this PIP.
Thanks.
--
Matteo Merli
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 5:14 AM 太上玄元道君 wrote:
> ＋1
>
> Enrico Olivelli 于2024年3月3日 周日16:58写道：
>
> > I support the initi
Thanks everyone, closing the vote with 4 binding +1s.
+1 votes:
* Lari
* PengHui
* Enrico
* Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 11:48 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Mer 6 Mar 2024, 02:55 PengHui Li ha scritto:
>
> > +1 (
+1
Verified checksums and signatures
Verified tests and local perf client
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 9:23 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified checksum and signatures
> - Run OAuth2 e2e examples with 0.12.1-candidate-1
> - Built from source and run
Using the Alpine image (PIP-324 in progress), removing Python I was able to
see ~350 MB size for the `pulsar` base image.
There could be additional space savings by removing unused JVM modules from
the image.
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 10:09 AM Girish Sharma
wrote:
> +1
&
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:02 PM Kalwit S wrote:
> I know I’m not trying to be disrespectful, but it’s not respectful to be
> biased and act like an expert during the reviews, while you’ve contributed
> just for documentation PRs. When I talk about experience, I’m talking about
> reviewers who don’
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:49 PM Kalwit S wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. But I wasn’t going to go after a specific person. I
>
Though that's precisely what your message was doing, in a very rude way.
(1) How many reviewers (less than 1) have been involved in PIP review
> outside of the streamna
Hi Dave,
The meeting is being conducted in the same exact way as it was when you
we’re participating in it.
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 6:43 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I see from the last meeting the following agenda:
>
> > 2024/02/29
> > At
sonal attacks are not OK here
2. I don't think it's good looking when you're reacting to people
disagreeing with you by claiming they either are incompetent or have some
hidden agenda. Perhaps trying to understand why they disagreed with you
would be more helpful.
Matteo
--
Matteo Me
I was proposing `pulsar-functions-python`, though I'm open to any other
name
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 6:43 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> What would be the name of the image that contains the functions runtime?
>
> Best,
> Dave
>
> > On Mar 5, 2024, at 6
will be very easy for users to select the appropriate image and
we wouldn't be carrying a big amount of useless Python dependencies to
users who don't need them.
What are people's opinions with respect to this?
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
Opening the vote thread for PIP-324: Alpine Docker images
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21716
WIP PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22054
Thank you,
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
Since the discussion has been open for a while now, I will proceed to a
vote.
Thanks everyone for bringing out all the perspectives here.
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:17 AM Alexander Hall
wrote:
> Matteo,
>
> Yes, I'm seeing a similar number of vulner
ient.lookup{type="list-topics"}` | Histogram | seconds |
Counter of namespace list topics operations |
Additionally, all the histograms will have a `success=true|false` label to
distinguish successful and failed
operations.
--
Matteo Merli
t 9.3)
Total: 172 (UNKNOWN: 0, LOW: 144, MEDIUM: 28, HIGH: 0, CRITICAL: 0)
Full list: https://gist.github.com/merlimat/a4fcea7336cab83ad64dcf01d9b15a1c
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 9:19 AM Alexander Hall
wrote:
> According to Red Hat their latest tagged release for UBI9.3, 9.3-1
Rather than raise the protocol version, there’s a feature flag mechanism in
the connect/connected handshake for this purpose
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 6:38 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> Yes, it’s better to bump a protocol version to keep the compatibility.
>
> Regards,
Good idea.
It would be nice to just have the config library to read the environment
variables directly, instead of having to write them down in the file.
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:28 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to bring up an issue with
Hi Alex,
the situation for UBI9 doesn't look much different from Ubuntu:
registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi (redhat 9.3)
Total: 166 (UNKNOWN: 0, LOW: 138, MEDIUM: 28, HIGH: 0, CRITICAL: 0)
Full list: https://gist.github.com/merlimat/ba96b91ea49709bb218ddc3906bb9e95
--
Matteo Merli
O
aa269bdf943c8f37aa5430258b7b4018f37ed120abb17a?context=explore
Thanks,
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 12:49 PM David Christle
wrote:
> Are we sure the move to Alpine is worth the extensive performance testing
> and the risk of issues? Sticking with a popular glibc image lik
I'm closing this vote after 48h with 4 binding +1s and 7 non-binding +1s
Binding +1s:
* Haiting
* Hang
* Enrico
* Matteo
Non-Binding +1s:
* Dao Jun
* Xiaoyu
* Zike
* Zixuan
* Apurva
* Kai
* Dezhi
Thanks everyone!
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 7:20 PM Dezh
Heesung is finalizing the work for adding support for PIP-188, blue-green
deployment support. It would be good to include in 1.5.0.
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 11:33 PM Zike Yang wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks for driving the release.
>
> BR,
> Zike Yang
>
> On Wed
nks
Oxia: https://github.com/streamnative/oxia
Oxia Java Client SDK: https://github.com/streamnative/oxia-java
--
Matteo Merli
Thanks to everyone,
moving to VOTE thread.
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 11:13 AM Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 11:55 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>> 2. Other questions. If the base Pulsar will now depend on Oxia and no
>> longer use Zookeeper?
On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 11:55 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> 2. Other questions. If the base Pulsar will now depend on Oxia and no
> longer use Zookeeper? Or is Oxia an option? Will Oxia be included as a
> Pulsar dependency in Pulsar convenience binaries?
>
It stated clearly in the proposal that: "It's
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the feedback, replies inline.
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 11:23 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> What? A cascade of agreement without questions? Seems like this has been
> discussed elsewhere?
>
No, Dave, there was no "elsewhere" discussion.
Because 12 people agree to the prop
nks
Oxia: https://github.com/streamnative/oxia
Oxia Java Client SDK: https://github.com/streamnative/oxia-java
--
Matteo Merli
it useful
* Once there are multiple "contributors" to the project, we plan to move
the governance to ASF
Oxia is definitely not a ZooKeeper proxy. It's a totally different
technology. More info in the github repo:
https://github.com/streamnative/oxia
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Jan 2
Since there seems to be agreement here, I'll proceed with the PR for
removing the code.
If there are volunteers that are willing to continue maintaining the Trino
plugin, I'll be happy to help out in setting up the new repository and
import the existing code.
Thanks,
Matteo
--
Ma
Good point. I have created a PR here:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21795
We can always cherry-pick changes into the release branch, during the code
freeze, with the appropriate precautions :)
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 9:41 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Do we tar
code from the last commit.
Thoughts?
--
Matteo Merli
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 4:24 PM Nicolò Boschi wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Nicolò Boschi
>
>
> Il giorno gio 21 dic 2023 alle 21:21 Lari Hotari ha
> scritto:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > -Lari
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 21 De
the Ubuntu base image can stay on the 3.0
LTS release branch for the entire LTS lifespan
I would avoid supporting 2 images at the same time because it would make it
very hard to properly test them both.
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:57 PM Zixuan Liu wrote:
> +1.
>
> It is a
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 8:20 AM Christophe Bornet
wrote:
> Thanks Matteo for bringing this subject.
>
> I share the concerns of Lari regarding the move from glibc to musl in
> terms of security, performance, compatibility with the JVM. Extensive
> performance
Hello,
I've created a new proposal to switch Pulsar base docker images from Ubuntu
to Alpine Linux.
Details and motivation in the PIP:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21716
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:13 AM Apurva Telang
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 4:50 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > -Lari
> >
> > On 2023/12/11 07:33:53 Asaf Mesika wrote:
> > > Hi,
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 4:51 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Lari
>
> On 2023/12/11 06:20:30 Lari Hotari wrote:
> > Dear Pulsar community,
> >
> > I am starting a vote thread for "PIP-322: Pulsar Rate Limiting
> Refactor
+1 (binding)
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 9:38 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Lari
>
> On 2023/11/15 03:59:46 Kevin Lu wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-315.
> >
> > PIP: https://github.com/a
+1 (binding)
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 11:55 AM Heesung Sohn
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to start a vote thread for the PIP-281.
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20748
>
> Discussion :
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/bdmx4qhn6hkoxm0xbtf67tq4kt5r8jmy
>
> Best,
> Heesung
>
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 9:56 PM Michael Marshall
wrote:
> Thanks for your proposal, Heesung. Sorry for my late response. Just
> want to make a few points to hopefully improve the implementation.
> Overall, I think this feature is absolutely the right direction for
>
+1 binding
- Checked signatures
- Checked macos and linux wheel files.
--
Matteo Merli
On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 6:13 PM PengHui Li wrote:
> OS: macOS Ventura Version 13.4.1 (c) (22F770820d)
> Python: 3.11.4
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Checked the signature
> - Build whee
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 8:03 AM Hang Chen wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for your great proposal!
>
> Best,
> Hang
>
> Asaf Mesika 于2023年8月28日周一 22:55写道：
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm very happy to start the vote
of
which one can tweek to its specific needs for productions environments.
Since this thread got started, there was no one stepping up, so I guess
your prevision was also correct :) and reinforces the idea that we
should reduce a bit the scope and expectation for this Helm chart.
--
Matteo Merli
itch to choose the existing metrics or the new ones. The dashboards will
be updated and provided.
At the same time, the best sure way to motivate users to switch or not
adopt a platform is to stick with confusing/inconsistent APIs/Metrics.
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 6:10 PM
Groups are useless unless there is some understanding of Bundles and
Load.
Isn't this thread the "discussion"? It has been open for more than a month
to let people the time to read and provide feedback on the proposal
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 10:00 AM Dave Fisher wr
+1
* Checked signature
* Installed and tested with Mac & linux wheels
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 7:36 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Checked the signature
> - Install pulsar_client-3.2.0-cp311-cp311-macosx_10_15_universal2.whl
> - Start
+1
Checked signatures, standalone & docker images.
--
Matteo Merli
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 8:32 AM Hang Chen wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Checksum and signatures
> - Built from sources on MacOS (JDK 11 and Maven 3.8.6)
> - Run rat check and check-binary-license on th
+1
Checked signatures, standalone & docker images.
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 7:38 AM Christophe Bornet
wrote:
> This is the third release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 3.0.0.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/miles
k, and serialization & compression are definitely part of that. The
important part is to avoid any blocking operations.
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 5:01 PM Andrey Yegorov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While looking through the code/thread dumps I noticed that decompression of
&
+1 (binding)
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 8:29 AM Asaf Mesika wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start the vote on PIP-249: Pulsar website redesign.
>
> PIP link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19611
>
> You can read the discussion thread here:
>
+1 (binding)
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 7:44 AM Yunze Xu
wrote:
> Hi Zike,
>
> It's not a regression. This error applies for Python client 3.0.0 as
> well. Before 3.0.0, the Python client cannot be interrupted by a
> signal. I'd rather treat it as the cas
+1 bindind
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 3:27 AM Yunze Xu
wrote:
> This is the 3rd release candidate for Apache Pulsar Client Python,
> version 3.1.0.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-python/milestone/2?closed=1
>
>
Ups,
I started from the release date I was meaning April for the RCs:
* Tue - 2023-04-11
* Tue - 2023-04-18 - RC-2
* Tue - 2023-04-25 - RC-3
* Tue - 2023-05-02 - Announce 3.0 Release
Sorry for the mixup!
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:39 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> +1.
&g
testing.
Since everyone also has other work duties and unexpected tasks that can pop
up at any time, it will help to have redundancy in the release-management
"team", so that we can release on the exact dates.
Thanks,
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
lternatives are really not "async" and would cause a lot of
performance regressions and other headaches.
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 5:52 AM Asaf Mesika wrote:
> Oh. I looked at the commits, it seems pretty active to me.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 3:31 P
Hi Haiting,
We'll publish the LTS and end-of-life policy on the website, with the
support dates for each release.
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 6:27 PM Haiting Jiang
wrote:
> Hi Matteo,
>
> I noticed that 2.10 is not mentioned to be the first LTS version as
> dis
Thanks everyone for voting.
I'm closing the vote with 8 binding +1s and 2 non-binding +1s
Binding:
* Matteo
* Nozomi
* PengHui
* Nicolò
* Yunze
* Hang
* Michael
* Enrico
Non-Binding:
* Zike
* Mattison
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 11:06 PM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
ssues are found.
The last 1 week will be used for the voting process and for updating Pulsar
website and the blog post announcing the release, which should (hopefully)
happen on the scheduled day.
--
Matteo Merli
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:28 AM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar Client C++, version
> 3.1.2.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/issues?q=label%3Arelease%2F3.1.2
>
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> There is a serious OAuth2 authentication regression [1] for all
> existing C++ client 3.x.y releases. I see many users tend to downgrade
> to old versions like 2.10.2. This behavior is danger
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 5:57 AM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> This is the 2nd release candidate for Apache Pulsar Client Python,
> version 3.1.0.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-python/milestone/2?closed=1
>
> *** P
The wheels work fine (tested Mac & Linux) and the checksums are all
correct, though the version is `3.1.0a1`. We need to remove `a1` for
final release that are uploaded to PyPI
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 1:00 AM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> This is the 1st release candidate for Apa
Closing this vote with 3 binding +1s votes:
* Matteo
* Masahiro
* Yunze
Thanks,
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 3:36 AM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> * verify checksum and signatures
> * build from source (Ubuntu 20.04 WSL)
> * verify ar
g PGP keys you use to sign the release:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pulsar/KEYS
Please download the source package, and follow the README to compile and test.
--
Matteo Merli
Thanks,
I'm canceling this vote, and I'll send out an RC-2 quickly.
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 5:42 AM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> It makes sense to me, I have cherry-picked it to branch-3.1 now. I
> think we need to open another candidate for it.
>
> Thanks,
&
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:11 PM Christophe Bornet
wrote:
> It's great that we released Pulsar 2.11. It has taken quite some time to
> stabilize the release branch and now we have more than 5 months of awesome
> features and commits on the master branch that would benefit a lot to our
> users. That
g PGP keys you use to sign the release:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pulsar/KEYS
Please download the source package, and follow the README to compile and test.
--
Matteo Merli
t-cpp/pull/146, but it still
needs to be released.
This problem is serious enough that I believe we should get a patch out ASAP.
I'll start the work on a 3.1.1 patch release.
Matteo
--
Matteo Merli
+1
* From candidate-2 I checked the source tarball for licenses, notice
and no binaries included.
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 11:30 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> This is the third release candidate for Apache Pulsar Client Python,
> version 3.0.0.
>
> It fixes the f
Yes, it was my mistake. I couldn't find a way to do it in Gitbox
though. :/ Probably it does require an INFRA ticket.
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 3:58 PM tison wrote:
>
> I found this repo: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-pulsar-client-cpp
>
> It seems to be cr
+1
Great work!
Checked:
* Signatures
* Wheel file on Mac ARM, publishing and consuming messages
* Wheel file on Alpine Linux, publishing and consuming messages
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 7:52 AM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> This is the second release candidate for Apache
Hi Yunze,
I think we need to fix the Py client version "3.0.0a1" --> "3.0.0" in
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-python/blob/main/version.txt
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 8:10 PM Yunze Xu wrote:
>
> This is the first release candidate fo
nt will depend on the Pulsar C++ Client 3.1.0.
>
> Please remind me if you have any important fixes that need to be
> included in 1.8.0
>
> [0] https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/compare/v1.7.0...master
>
> BR,
> Zike Yang
>
--
--
Matteo Merli
+1 binding.
Checked:
* Source compiling and tested with perf producer
* Signatures
* RPM & Deb packages installing
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 5:57 PM Zike Yang wrote:
>
> This is the third release candidate for Apache Pulsar Client C++,
> version 3.1.0.
>
+1 Good suggestion
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 7:32 AM tison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When squashing issue backlog, I noticed there're a number of "legacy" tags
> in series "traige/week-x".
>
> It seems the initiative has been halted and
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 3:20 PM Heesung Sohn
wrote:
>
> Dear Pulsar Community,
>
> Please review and vote on this PIP.
>
> PIP link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18215
>
> Thank you,
> -Heesung
possible.
Regards,
The Pulsar Team
--
Matteo Merli
for maintaining apps using Pulsar. It's also bad PR because
> >> then incidents are associated with Pulsar, even though the business
> might
> >> not understand that the data problem wasn't necessarily caused by
> Pulsar.
> >>
> >> What's the right way for us to address this problem?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Devin Bost
> >> Sent from mobile
> >> Cell: 801-400-4602
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Elliot West
> >
> > Senior Platform Engineer
> >
> > elliot.w...@streamnative.io
> >
> > streamnative.io
> >
> > <https://github.com/streamnative>
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/streamnative>
> > <https://twitter.com/streamnativeio>
>
> --
--
Matteo Merli
Thank you for testing this release. Closing the vote
3 binding +1s:
* Matteo
* PengHui
* Hang
3 non binding +1s:
* Zike
* Kai
* Yunze
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:16 AM Hang Chen wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified checksum and signatures
> - Build from
n the release:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pulsar/KEYS
Please download the source package, and follow the README to compile and test.
--
Matteo Merli
is merged.
--
Matteo Merli
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 10:26 AM Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar Client C++, version
> 3.0.0.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp/milestone/1?closed=1
>
> *** Plea
w which c++
client is actually underneath.
--
Matteo Merli
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 1:47 AM Baodi Shi
wrote:
>
> Hi, We're releasing C++ and python 3.0.0 client, Node.js Client is also built
> on C++, and I'd like to discuss whether to start working on Node.js Client
> 3.
n the release:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pulsar/KEYS
Please download the source package, and follow the README to compile and test.
--
Matteo Merli
Canceling this vote. I'll send out the RC2 in a bit.
--
Matteo Merli
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 9:08 AM Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 9:02 AM Matteo Merli wrote:
> > Honestly, I don't know why it was ever documented in the README.
>
> BTW: it turns o
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 9:02 AM Matteo Merli wrote:
> Honestly, I don't know why it was ever documented in the README.
BTW: it turns out it was me who added these scripts in the README, in 2017 🤦
--
Matteo Merli
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 7:35 PM Michael Marshall wrote:
>
> I am getting an error when building from the downloaded source tarball
> while following the instructions in the README. I get this error:
>
> $ ./docker-build.sh
> fatal: not a git repository (or
1 - 100 of 394 matches
Mail list logo
