Hi Apurva, Thanks for applying the changes to the proposal.
It looks good and given the time since it was already created, please feel free to move to a vote at any time. -- Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 8:35 PM Apurva Telang <apurvatelan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello All, > > I had submitted PIP-337 a few months ago regarding customizing the > generation of SSL Context and SSL Engine. Based on past community feedback, > I have made the required modifications in the PIP. > > PIP link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22016 > > Please can the community help review the PIP again and provide additional > feedback. > > Best regards, > Apurva Telang > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 11:58 AM Apurva Telang <apurvatelan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Hello All, > > > > I have submitted a PIP to add a SSL Factory Plugin to customize the > > generation of SSL Context and SSL Engine. > > > > Motivation: > > Apache Pulsar's TLS encryption configuration is not pluggable. It only > > supports file-based certificates. This makes Pulsar difficult to adopt > for > > organizations that require loading TLS certificates by other mechanisms. > > > > Goals: > > > > 1. Provide a mechanism to plugin a custom SSL Factory that can > > generate SSL Context and SSL Engine. > > 2. Simplify the Pulsar code base to universally use > > javax.net.ssl.SSLContext and reduce the amount of code required to > build > > and configure the SSL context taking into consideration backwards > > compatibility. > > > > PIP link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22016 > > > > Please can the community review the PIP and provide your feedback. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Apurva Telang. > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Apurva Telang. >
