I don't think the compatibility for downstream users is going to be a big problem: 1. Most users don't need to modify the Pulsar image in significant way 2. If they do, they won't be using the "latest" tag, but rather a specific version 3. Users who are dependent on the Ubuntu base image can stay on the 3.0 LTS release branch for the entire LTS lifespan
I would avoid supporting 2 images at the same time because it would make it very hard to properly test them both. -- Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:57 PM Zixuan Liu <zix...@apache.org> wrote: > +1. > > It is a good idea to use the Alpine image to run the Pulsar, as it is more > secure. > > However, switching images may affect downstream users, and I am wondering > if it is possible to provide multiple docker tags: > - latest: using the Ubuntu image > - alpine: using the Alpine image > > Thanks, > Zixuan > > Yunze Xu <x...@apache.org> 于2023年12月13日周三 12:24写道： > > > +1 to me. The Alpine Linux is much more light-weight than Ubuntu. > > > > Thanks, > > Yunze > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 3:00 AM Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I've created a new proposal to switch Pulsar base docker images from > > Ubuntu > > > to Alpine Linux. > > > > > > Details and motivation in the PIP: > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21716 > > > > > > Matteo > > > > > > -- > > > Matteo Merli > > > <mme...@apache.org> > > >
