Re: [VOTE] PIP-412: Support setting messagePayloadProcessor in Pulsar Functions and Sinks

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Sab 5 Apr 2025, 06:17 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > -Lari > > On 2025/04/01 09:08:53 Pengcheng Jiang wrote: > > Hi, All. > > > > I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-412: Support setting > > messagePayloadProcessor in Pulsar Functions and Sinks >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pulsar 0.5.0

idation steps as outlined in the link below and > > compiled the binary tarball. The package has been running well on my > > computer, and I was able to log in without any issues: > > > > [Apache Pulsar Manager Release Candidate > > Validation]( > https://github.com/a

Re: [DISCUSS] Upcoming Pulsar releases 3.0.10, 3.3.5, 4.0.3 addressing CVE-2025-24970

Il Mer 26 Feb 2025, 22:00 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > The releases continue to be blocked by a lack of binding votes. > > Regarding the semi-automated validation with > https://github.com/lhotari/pulsar-release-validation in a Docker > container, the solution now uses a persistent Docker volume to

Re: [DISCUSS] Doubt about the widely used Netty Recycler in Pulsar

Yunze, I support your doubts. Recycling objects is useful only under certain conditions and it adds lot of complexity. It is a tool that we can use but we should do it only when needed. And 'when needed' can only be measured with running workloads that exercise the code paths that you are changing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pulsar 0.5.0

i 268239360 Jan 12 15:49 pulsar-manager.tar enricoolivelli@enrico-5570:~/dev/release_validation/pulsar-manager-0.5.0/apache-pulsar-manager-0.5.0-bin$ cd dist/ enricoolivelli@enrico-5570:~/dev/release_validation/pulsar-manager-0.5.0/apache-pulsar-manager-0.5.0-bin/dist$ ls -la total 36 drwxr-xr-x 3 en

Re: [VOTE] PIP-404： Introduce per-ledger properties

Tao, I think that the proposal is valuable. We have to clarify which datatypes are supported both for the keys and for the values. Are keys and values only raw arrays of bytes? It would be better to have a way to detect the types, so that automatic tools, like CLIs and UIs can represent the value

Re: [VOTE] PIP-395: Add Proxy configuration to support configurable response headers for http reverse-proxy

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Lun 10 Feb 2025, 11:11 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > -Lari > > On 2025/02/06 20:59:32 Rajan Dhabalia wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to start voting thread for PIP-395 to add support for > > configurable response headers in http reverse-proxy > > > > PIP

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pulsar 0.5.0

I have imported the KEYS file https://downloads.apache.org/pulsar/KEYS but I cannot validate the release: for i in *asc; do gpg --verify $i; done; gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-pulsar-manager-0.5.0-bin.tar.gz' gpg: Signature made Wed 15 Jan 2025 04:25:48 PM CET gpg:using

Re: [VOTE] PIP-393: Improve performance of Negative Acknowledgement.

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Gio 28 Nov 2024, 12:22 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > -Lari > > On 2024/11/28 03:27:05 thetumbled wrote: > > Hi, Pulsar Community. > > I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-393: Improve > performance of Negative Acknowledgement. > > Proposal PR:

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-393: Improve performance of Negative Acknowledgement

This is a very nice improvement and well described No comments. I will be +1 on VOTE Enrico Il giorno mar 26 nov 2024 alle ore 05:12 WenZhi Feng ha scritto: > Hello, Pulsar Community. > I add the space complexity analysis of the new data structure in the PIP: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/

Re: [VOTE] PCIP-1 Add the development process for pulsar-java-contrib project

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mar 12 nov 2024 alle ore 15:16 Jia Zhai ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 9:11 PM Haiting Jiang > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Haiting > > > > > > On 2024/11/12 12:18:11 xiangying meng wrote: > > > +1(non-binding) > > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-385 Add rate limit semantics to pulsar protocol and Java Client

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mer 13 nov 2024 alle ore 03:37 Apurva Telang < apurvatelan...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 12:26 AM Zixuan Liu wrote: > > > +1(non-binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Zixuan > > > > Girish Sharma 于2024年11月11日周一 15:02写道： > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] PCIP-1 Add the development process for pulsar-java-contrib project

+1 It is clear that maintaining the repository is under the responsibility of the Pulsar PMC and only Pulsar committers are able to commit patches to the repository. Committers must apply the usual diligence in committing the patches, and enforce the usual rules: at least 2 +1s from committers (o

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-391: Enable batch index ACK by default

+1 Thanks Enrico Il giorno ven 8 nov 2024 alle ore 12:40 Zike Yang ha scritto: > +1 > > Thanks, > Zike Yang > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 2:51 PM Zixuan Liu wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Zixuan > > > > Yunze Xu 于2024年11月6日周三 20:45写道： > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I wrote a PIP (https://

Re: [DISCUSS] Expediting Pulsar releases 3.0.7 and 3.3.2 due to critical RCE vulnerability in Avro Java SDK <1.11.4, CVE-2024-47561

Il giorno gio 3 ott 2024 alle ore 22:59 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > Dear Pulsar Community, > > There's a critical 9.3/10 level RCE vulnerability in Avro Java SDK > <1.11.4, CVE-2024-47561. > More details can be found in these resources: > - https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-r7pg-v2c8-mfg3 > - http

Re: [VOTE] PIP-384: ManagedLedger interface decoupling

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Mer 2 Ott 2024, 03:21 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > +1 > -- > Matteo Merli > > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 5:03 PM Rajan Dhabalia > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Rajan > > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 9:36 AM Lari Hotari wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'd l

Re: [VOTE] PIP-379: Key_Shared Draining Hashes for Improved Message Ordering

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Mer 2 Ott 2024, 03:21 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > +1 > -- > Matteo Merli > > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 4:53 PM Lari Hotari wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to start the voting thread for PIP-379: Key_Shared Draining > > Hashes for Improved Message Ordering > > > > Pro

Re: [DISCUSS] Revisit PIP voting max time

Il giorno mar 24 set 2024 alle ore 17:31 Dave Fisher ha scritto: > > > > On Sep 23, 2024, at 8:07 PM, Yunze Xu wrote: > > > > I have similar concerns for it. Some PIPs might not get enough > > attention. Generally I agree with the proposal that a PIP should be > > treated as "approved" if > > -

Re: [VOTE] PIP-381: Handle large PositionInfo state

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Lun 23 Set 2024, 19:41 Andrey Yegorov ha scritto: > Hi, > > I'd like to start the voting thread for PIP-381: Handle large PositionInfo > state. > > Proposal PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23328 > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8sm0h804v591

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-381: Handle large PositionInfo state

Il Sab 21 Set 2024, 01:51 Rajan Dhabalia ha scritto: > Hi Andrey, > > Thanks for submitting the PR as we have been facing this issue for a long > time now and we also have PR which solves this issue in a simple and a > fundamental way with proven perf results as well. > > PR: https://github.com/a

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-379: Key_Shared Draining Hashes for Improved Message Ordering

Awesome proposal, no questions from my side +1 Enrico Il giorno sab 14 set 2024 alle ore 16:21 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > Dear Pulsar Community, > > I'd like to propose a new improvement for Pulsar's Key_Shared > subscription mode, outlined in PIP-379. This proposal aims to address > several is

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-376 Make topic policies service pluggable

Nice write up ! I generally support this proposal, we should have clearer APIs for the components we want to allow users to customize Enrico Il giorno mar 3 set 2024 alle ore 17:35 Yunze Xu ha scritto: > Hi all, > > I drafted a proposal to make topic policies service pluggable. > https://githu

Re: [VOTE] PIP-367 Propose a Contributor Repository for Pulsar

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Lun 12 Ago 2024, 18:39 Dave Fisher ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > > On Aug 5, 2024, at 5:53 AM, Yunze Xu wrote: > > > > -1 (binding) > > > > See reasons here: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/0mold5ko1z3t8pjwb46bt07o2lcqh0oy > > I find some of these reasons “disturbin

Re: [VOTE] PIP-368: Support lookup based on the lookup properties

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Gio 1 Ago 2024, 13:08 Zike Yang ha scritto: > Hi, everyone, > > I want to start a vote on PIP-368: Support lookup based on the lookup > properties > > You can find the proposal at > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23075 and the discussion thread > at https://lists.a

Re: [DISCUSS] Propose a Contributor Repository for Pulsar

pository, but > in > > > the > > > > > > > contributor's personal repository. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on the above content, let's continue to look at the > > question > > > > you raised.

Re: [VOTE] PIP-352: Event time based topic compactor

+1 (binding) Thanks for driving this initiative Enrico Olivelli Il Mar 23 Lug 2024, 10:20 Marek Czajkowski ha scritto: > Hi Enrico I have created discussion thread earlier but not many responses. > Here is the thread link > https://lists.apache.org/thread/nc8r3tm9xv03vl30zrmfhd1

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-352: Event time based topic compactor

Il Gio 25 Lug 2024, 14:32 Marek Czajkowski ha scritto: > Hi all, > I pushed a new proposal to enable another topic compaction mechanism based > on eventTIme. > > Please take a look and share your thoughts. Thanks! > > Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22710 Thanks for updating the PIP

Re: [DISCUSS] Propose a Contributor Repository for Pulsar

ut of this fork ? Who is going > to > > validate them ? Who is responsible for security bugs? > > > > > > > > > > We will only need to maintain a documents of feature and plugins > list > > > > > that have been reviewed by PR. We wi

Re: [VOTE] PIP-352: Event time based topic compactor

-1 (binding) I cannot find the discussion thread about this PIP (on the mailing list) I have found this PIP only because someone tagged me on slack I am not 100% sure about the proposal, compaction is a tricky mechanism and the PIP on GH doesn't provide many details about how this new mechanism i

Re: [DISCUSS] Propose a Contributor Repository for Pulsar

ulate code without being responsible for that. I am happy to clarify more if needed, and I hope that other in the community can help in understanding if this is doable of not Enrico > > In addition, thank you for your valuable feedback. > > Best regards > Xiangying > > On Mon, Jul

Re: [DISCUSS] Propose a Contributor Repository for Pulsar

I misunderstood the goal ? An alternative is to have a "curated list" of links to personal projects, but we keep the responsibility over the code on the code owners and not on the Pulsar PMC Best regards Enrico Olivelli Il giorno lun 22 lug 2024 alle ore 15:15 steven lu ha scritto: > W

Re: [DISCUSS] Cherry-pick PIP-364: Introduce a new load balance algorithm AvgShedder.

+1 I agree Enrico Olivelli Il giorno gio 18 lug 2024 alle ore 10:00 Baodi Shi ha scritto: > +1 > > Its implementation is independent, We should be able to cherry-pick it > easily. > > > Thanks, > Baodi Shi > > WenZhi Feng 于2024年7月18日周四 11:49写道： > > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Report an error when seeking a multi-topics consumer that subscribes no topics

Il giorno mer 29 mag 2024 alle ore 11:10 Baodi Shi ha scritto: > +1 > > > Thanks, > Baodi Shi > > > On May 29, 2024 at 14:50:12, Yunze Xu wrote: > > > Hi community, > > > > Recently I found the behavior of seeking a multi-topics consumer is > > intuitive. If there are no internal consumers, the

Regerssion in EntryFilter loading in Pulsar 3.x

Hello, I have found this regression related to EntryFilters https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22767 The problem has been introduced in 3.0.0. Can you please review the patch ? It must be committed to all of the active branches from 3.0 onwards Best regards Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] PIP-351: Additional options for Pulsar-Test client to support KeyStore based TLS

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Ven 17 Mag 2024, 03:54 Zixuan Liu ha scritto: > +1 (non-binding) > > BTW, a PIP requires 3 binding votes. > > Thanks, > Zixuan > > Shasank Sekhar Pandey 于2024年5月17日 > 周五03:21写道： > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to start a voting thread for PIP-351: [improve][pip] > PIP-3

Re: [VOTE] PIP-347: add role field in consumer's stat

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mar 14 mag 2024 alle ore 11:31 太上玄元道君 ha scritto: > +1 nonbinding > > Thanks, > Tao Jiuming > > thetumbled 于2024年5月14日 周二17:26写道： > > > Hi, Pulsar Community. > > I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-347: add role field in > > consumer's stat. > > Pro

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading to Jetty 12 since Jetty 9.4.x has reached end-of-line in June 2022

+1 to the upgrade The only problem is for any broker plugin that registers a Servlet, so we cannot cherry-pick this change to preview release lines Enrico Il giorno mer 8 mag 2024 alle ore 22:05 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > Targeting 3.4.x/4.0.x for Jetty 12 upgrade. > Here's the WIP: > https://g

Re: [VOTE] PIP-348: Trigger offload on topic load stage

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mer 8 mag 2024 alle ore 12:51 Zike Yang ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Zike Yang > > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 6:22 PM Yubiao Feng > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks > > Yubiao Feng > > > > On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 11:27 AM Hang Chen wrote: > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-348: Trigger offload on topic load stage

it has been pending in > review > > for a lng time, I'm very appreciate it that if you can help review > > > > 4. There are t many flags in pulsar(~500), I think we should be > > cautious when introducing new FLAGs > > > > Thanks, > > Tao J

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-349: Add systemCursorNames ignore list for TTL check

own names should be always handled automatically Enrico > > Penghui > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:51 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Overall I support this idea, but the name 'systemCursorsNames' is not > good > > and we should not make it co

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-349: Add systemCursorNames ignore list for TTL check

Overall I support this idea, but the name 'systemCursorsNames' is not good and we should not make it configurable. First, we have to make a call to the TTL thing, otherwise we will end up in using that for other stuff, and not only TTL. Second, we shouldn't make this configurable. Those cursors d

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-348: Trigger offload on topic load stage

lead to unexpected results, like overwhelmed systems Enrico > > Enrico Olivelli 于2024年5月5日 周日02:41写道： > > > Overall I think it is a good idea. > > > > What about adding a flag to enable this behavior? > > > > In case there are problems with the offloader the to

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-348: Trigger offload on topic load stage

Overall I think it is a good idea. What about adding a flag to enable this behavior? In case there are problems with the offloader the topic won't be able to load. Enrico Il Sab 4 Mag 2024, 17:12 Hang Chen ha scritto: > Hi guys, > I pushed a new proposal to improve the tiered storage off

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 3.3.0 release

+1 Thanks for driving the release. FYI On the BookKeeper side there are some fixes about metrics, maybe we could ask for a new 4.17.1 release Enrico Il giorno dom 28 apr 2024 alle ore 21:04 PengHui Li ha scritto: > +1 > > Thanks for driving the release. > > Penghui > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at

Re: [VOTE] PIP-327 Support force topic loading for unrecoverable errors

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Mar 16 Apr 2024, 19:08 Rajan Dhabalia ha scritto: > Hi, > > I would like to start voting thread for PIP-327 which also addresses issue > # https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/21751 > > PIP design PR: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21752 >

Re: (Apache committer criteria) [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Asaf Mesika

o begin constructively finding a > > > solution. Perhaps defining the problems we have in the Pulsar community > > > would be a good starting point. One clear indication of a problem is > the > > > number of open pull requests we have in apache/pulsar;

Re: [VOTE] PIP-343: Use picocli instead of jcommander

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mer 6 mar 2024 alle ore 16:04 Zixuan Liu ha scritto: > > Hello, > > A new proposal to improve the CLI user experience. > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22181 > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ydg1q064cd11pxwz693frtk4by74q32f > > PR

Re: [VOTE] PIP-324: Alpine Docker images

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Mer 6 Mar 2024, 02:55 PengHui Li ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Penghui > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:54 AM Lari Hotari wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > -Lari > > > > On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 23:48, Matteo Merli > wrote: > > > > > > Opening the vote thread f

Re: (Apache committer criteria) [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Asaf Mesika

contributions are blocked, please start a new thread with this problem. This is a community, it is not a product managed by one single company. Best regards Enrico Olivelli Il Mer 6 Mar 2024, 06:27 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > I will not enter into debating the long list of grievances here, thoug

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire pulsar-all Docker image and spin-off Python Functions runtime

+1 Great idea Enrico Il Mer 6 Mar 2024, 08:23 Zixuan Liu ha scritto: > +1 > > This is a good idea, and then we must provide a document on building the > own connector image and python functions runtime image. > > Thanks, > Zixuan > > Matteo Merli 于2024年3月6日周三 07:04写道： > > > The docker image `

Re: Staging release artifacts fail when file size exceeds 429MB, ASF Infra ticket created to increase limit by about 100MB

Il Mar 5 Mar 2024, 14:33 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > The size had increased from 428MiB to 434MiB. I had mixed the units > MiB/1048576B and MB/100B. We found an explanation to the increase. > byte-buddy-1.14.12.jar adds 4MiB to the release and the remaining 2MiB > comes from upgraded jars. > T

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Kiryl Valkovich

Congratulations! Enrico Il Mar 5 Mar 2024, 17:03 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > Congrats! You are definitely a great addition to Pulsar committers! > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 4:58 AM Zixuan Liu wrote: > > > Congrats! > > > > Lari Hotari 于2024年2月27日周二 14:14写道： > > > > > Congrats, Kiryl! > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-342: Support OpenTelemetry metrics in Pulsar client

I support the initiative Lgtm Thanks Enrico Enrico Il Dom 3 Mar 2024, 04:09 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > PIP PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22178 > > WIP of proposed implementation: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22179 > > > > # PIP 342: Support OpenTel

A jclouds VOTE us running, heads up!

against that RC. I personally don't have time, but I hope that someone could help there Thanks Enrico Olivelli

Re: [DISCUSS] Do not create partitioned metadata when calling pulsarClient.getPartitionsForTopic(topicName)

Il Gio 29 Feb 2024, 08:46 PengHui Li ha scritto: > +1 for the motivation > > We should not create partitioned topics when calling > `pulsarClient.getPartitionsForTopic` > > The tricky part is the broker doesn't know if the partition metadata > getting request is from create produce/consumer or ju

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pulsar Helm Chart 3.3.0 based on 3.3.0-candidate-1

+1 (binding) Verified checksums and signatures Installed on minikube and run a few smoke tests from the "toolset" pod Thanks for driving the release Enrico Il giorno mar 27 feb 2024 alle ore 00:45 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > - Deploy pulsar cluster on local docker-desktop(with

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate CLI parser from jcommander to picocli

d is just a preliminary idea to replace jcommander, and I will > > write a PIP later. > > > > Thanks, > > Zixuan > > > > > > Enrico Olivelli 于2024年2月23日周五 22:59写道： > > > > > Il Ven 23 Feb 2024, 04:34 Zixuan Liu ha scritto: > > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate CLI parser from jcommander to picocli

Il Ven 23 Feb 2024, 04:34 Zixuan Liu ha scritto: > Thanks for the feedback! > > > Please take into account Pulsar Shell extensions > > This is a tricky issue, I noticed that it depends on jcommander here, Can you please share some pointers ? IIRC the shell extensions shouldn't need jcommander,

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate CLI parser from jcommander to picocli

+1 Please take into account Pulsar Shell extensions Enrico Il Mer 21 Feb 2024, 11:21 Girish Sharma ha scritto: > +1 (non-binding) > It has been a pain trying to figure out what's the exact sub-param name > given that some of them are 20+ characters long. > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 3:47 PM

Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal to Replace Pulsar's Homegrown Configuration Framework with Gestalt Config

Lari, Il Mer 21 Feb 2024, 10:27 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to bring up an issue with Pulsar's containers, specifically > regarding the method of overriding configurations. For instance, the > Apache Pulsar Helm chart employs "bin/apply-config-from-env.py > conf/br

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Asaf Mesika

Congratulations! Enrico Il Mar 20 Feb 2024, 18:08 Kiryl Valkovich ha scritto: > Congratulations, Asaf! > > From: Lari Hotari > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 5:50 PM > To: dev@pulsar.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Asaf Mesika > > The Apache

Re: [VOTE] Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar 0.5.3 Candidate 1

+1 (binding) Validated checksum and signature All tests passed on Ubuntu, JDK1 Thanks for running the release Enrico Il giorno ven 16 feb 2024 alle ore 19:01 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > Validated source artifacts > - checked sha512 checksum > - checked signature > > Validated

Re: HI - Introducing myself to the community, exploring/adopting Pulsar!

Welcome Enrico Il giorno mer 7 feb 2024 alle ore 11:30 Julien Jakubowski ha scritto: > > Hi Austin, > > Welcome to the Pulsar community! > I’m excited to see how you’ll integrate Pulsar into your work at ChartBoost. > Contributions, whether through documentation, sharing success stories, or > i

Re: [DISCUSS] Deletion of Current Ledger upon Rollover

Xiangying Il giorno mar 6 feb 2024 alle ore 13:01 Xiangying Meng ha scritto: > > Dear Community, > > I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to discuss a modification > to the behavior of deleting the current ledger. As you may know, in Pulsar, > the current ledger cannot be deleted beca

Re: [VOTE] PIP-335: Oxia metadata support

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno mar 6 feb 2024 alle ore 11:36 houxiaoyu ha scritto: > > +1 nonbinding > > Thanks, > Xiaoyu Hou > > 太上玄元道君 于2024年2月6日周二 15:59写道： > > > > +1 nonbinding > > > > Matteo Merli 于2024年2月6日 周二04:40写道： > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22009 > > > > > > --

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar 3.2.0 released

Congrats ! this is a great milestone Thank you for driving the release Enrico Il giorno lun 5 feb 2024 alle ore 13:52 guo jiwei ha scritto: > > The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pulsar version 3.2.0. > > Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on > c

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-335: Oxia metadata support

Sounds good Enrico Il giorno gio 1 feb 2024 alle ore 07:18 Apurva Telang ha scritto: > > +1 > > Best Regards, > Apurva Telang > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 8:00 PM 太上玄元道君 wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Matteo Merli 于2024年2月1日 周四07:58写道： > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22009 > > > > > > =

Re: [VOTE] Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar 0.5.2 Candidate 1

+1 (binding) - verified checksums - run all tests, on JDK 11 Thanks for putting up the release Enrico Il giorno lun 15 gen 2024 alle ore 13:08 guo jiwei ha scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > - verified source package checksum and signature. > - verified binary `./scripts/validate_staging_repo.sh 0.

Re: [VOTE] PIP-325: Add command to abort transaction

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Lun 8 Gen 2024, 03:55 ruihongzhou ha scritto: > Hi community, > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-325: Add command to abort > transaction. > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21731 > > Releted PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21630 > > Discuss

Re: [VOTE] PIP-326: Create a BOM to ease dependency management

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno ven 22 dic 2023 alle ore 02:46 Apurva Telang ha scritto: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 4:30 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > -- > > Matteo Merli > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 4:24 PM Nicolò Boschi > > wrote: > > > > > +1 bi

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 3.1.2 Candidate 2

+1 (binding) Built from sources Run some smoke tests with Pulsar standalone Verified checksums and signatures (I had to import KEYS, there was a new key) Enrico Il giorno mer 13 dic 2023 alle ore 09:42 guo jiwei ha scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > - Checked the signatures > - Built from source > -

Re: [DISCUSS] Strategy for pushing the latest tag to Pulsar docker images

The first option is better, as it allows people to try out the latest features and hopefully it is more stable. On the other side we should not encourage people to use 'latest' in production as because it is by design unpredictable. Let's day that you have a system that had been running for a year

Re: [VOTE] PIP-313 Support force unsubscribe using consumer api

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno lun 11 dic 2023 alle ore 12:56 Yunze Xu ha scritto: > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Yunze > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 2:18 PM Apurva Telang > wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 6:12 PM guo jiwei wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-320: OpenTelemetry Scaffolding

+1 (binding) Enrico Il Lun 11 Dic 2023, 08:38 Yunze Xu ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Yunze > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 3:34 PM Asaf Mesika wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm starting the vote for PIP-320 (1st sub-PIP of PIP-264) > > > > Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21635

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Pulsar Python clieng 3.4.0

+1 Enrico Il giorno lun 4 dic 2023 alle ore 08:31 Zike Yang ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar Python client 3.4.0. > > It's over three months since the release of 3.3.0, and there are 46 new > commits: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-python/compa

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-320: OpenTelemetry Scaffolding

Il giorno mer 29 nov 2023 alle ore 12:01 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 12:18 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Asaf, > > > > > > > > Il Mar 28 Nov 2023, 19:14 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > > > > > Hi, > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Introducing Apache Pulsar Office Hour Meetings

all of the commuters can > > volunteer to run this meeting. > > >> > > >> When? > > >> > > >> We need to talk about a suitable time range. It’s better to cover > > different time zones. EMEA, APAC, etc. > > >> > > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-320: OpenTelemetry Scaffolding

Asaf, Il Mar 28 Nov 2023, 19:14 Asaf Mesika ha scritto: > Hi, > > This is the first sub-PIP for parent PIP-264 > ("Enhanced OTel-based metric > system"). > > This PIPs goal is to introduce OpenTelemetry into Apache Pulsar. When this > PIP is implem

Re: Pulsar Community Meeting minutes 2023/11/23

Thanks Lari for sharing Enrico Il Ven 24 Nov 2023, 11:03 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > Pulsar Community Meeting minutes 2023/11/23 > > Notice: Draft minutes pending review - please suggest any corrections or > additions by replying to this email thread. > > - Attendees: >- Girish Sharma >

Re: [DISCUSS] Introducing Apache Pulsar Office Hour Meetings

Hello, this sounds like a good idea. It is not clear to me who is going to run these meetings (also when and how) Can you please share some more context ? Maybe I missed something (both here or on private@) Thanks Enrico Il giorno lun 20 nov 2023 alle ore 16:36 PengHui Li ha scritto: > > Hi Mat

Re: [VOTE] PIP-317: Add `bookkeeperDeleted` field to show whether a ledger is deleted from the Bookie while using tiered storage

+1 It will be important to add tests about rolling back to the previous version of Pulsar and/or clusters with mixed versions of the brokers (during rolling upgrades). The old version should not complain about the new field added. Maybe you can add a note in the PIP Enrico Il Mer 15 Nov 2023, 00

Re: [VOTE] Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar 0.5.0 Candidate 2

+1 (binding) - run all the tests (on JDK17, M1 laptop) - verified checksums and signatures thanks for putting up the release Enrico Il giorno mer 15 nov 2023 alle ore 10:17 Christophe Bornet ha scritto: > > This is release candidate 2 for the Reactive Java client for Apache > Pulsar, version 0.

Re: [DISSCUSS] Don't retain null-key messages during topic compaction

This is a good point. Is it worth to make it configurable per topic and per namespace? Even if this behavior is kind if a side effect or bug, maybe some applications rely on it. Flags that change the behavior per cluster are hard to adopt in nig cluster with many tenants. We should always take m

Re: Reporting and tooling to detect thread leaks in Pulsar tests

Il Lun 30 Ott 2023, 06:39 Lari Hotari ha scritto: > Hi Asaf, > > Yes, the visibility aspect is already solved by using warnings in the > summary view. Please check the example > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/actions/runs/6680066364?pr=21450 . > > Job summaries could also be used, but they have

Re: [DISCUSS] Auto release Nuget artifacts for DotPulsar

How do we handle the VOTE? Enrico Il Lun 30 Ott 2023, 08:06 Zike Yang ha scritto: > Hi, David > > Thanks for initializing this discussion. > I'm +1 for making the auto-release process for the DotPulsar. I have > left some comments in the PR. > > Thanks, > Zike Yang > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 5

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to Java 21 for development and Pulsar server component runtime

I support the idea of moving to JDK21, as far as we continue to support JDK8 for the clients Thanks for bringing up this topic Enrico Il giorno mer 18 ott 2023 alle ore 13:37 mattison chao ha scritto: > > Thanks for your answer. > > > > We have the PIP, but that doesn't answer the question abo

Re: [VOTE] Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar 0.4.0 Candidate 1

My command was wrong, you have to use "--verify" and not "-verify" (with one dash). +1 (binding) - Built from sources - Run the tests - Verified checksums and signatures Thanks for driving the release Enrico Il giorno mer 4 ott 2023 alle ore 11:42 Enrico Olivelli ha s

Re: [VOTE] Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar 0.4.0 Candidate 1

I am not able to validate the signature: gpg -verify pulsar-client-reactive-0.4.0-src.tar.gz.asc gpg: enabled compatibility flags: gpg: ify: skipped: No public key gpg: pulsar-client-reactive-0.4.0-src.tar.gz.asc: encryption failed: No public key Enrico Il giorno mar 3 ott 2023 alle ore 13:55 La

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Pulsar 3.1.1

+1 Enrico Il giorno lun 25 set 2023 alle ore 05:08 Yubiao Feng ha scritto: > > +1 > > Thanks > Yubiao Feng > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:32 PM guo jiwei wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar 3.1.1. > > > > It's over one month since the release of 3.1.0 and th

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Pulsar 3.0.2

+1 Enrico Il giorno lun 25 set 2023 alle ore 05:05 Zike Yang ha scritto: > > +1 > > BR, > Zike Yang > > On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:58 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > Please use the correct name of the project - Apache Pulsar. > > > > Thanks, > > Dave > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Sep 2

Re: [VOTE] PIP-297: Support terminating Function & Connector with the fatal exception

+1 (binding) Enrico Il giorno lun 4 set 2023 alle ore 12:32 Zike Yang ha scritto: > > Hi, all > > Since there are no other concerns in the discussion, I'm delighted to > start the voting process for the PIP-297. > > Here is the link to the PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21079 > > BR,

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-297: Support raising exceptions using Function & Connector context

Zike, Il giorno lun 28 ago 2023 alle ore 11:53 Zike Yang ha scritto: > > Hi, all > > I opened a new PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21079 > > This PIP is to improve the current function exception handler. It will > be applied to both Pulsar Function and Pulsar IO Connector. > > Please

Re: [Discuss] Release Pulsar Python Client 3.3.0

+1 Enrico Il Mar 15 Ago 2023, 14:04 Zike Yang ha scritto: > +1 > > BR, > Zike Yang > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 7:19 PM Baodi Shi wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar Python Client 3.3.0. > > > > It has been over 2 months since the last release (3.2.0). Th

Re: [DISCUSS] Consistent code style (esp. ws/indent) and autotools

Tison, Il Mar 15 Ago 2023, 16:56 tison ha scritto: > A demostration for change set - > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20974 While I think it is great to start with Spotless for little projects or when you start from scratch, appling a patch that changes 3.000+ files will make it very h

Re: [VOTE] PIP 289: Secure Pulsar Connector Configuration

+1 (binding) Thanks Enrico Il Gio 10 Ago 2023, 18:46 Michael Marshall ha scritto: > +1 (binding) > > - Michael > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:43 AM Michael Marshall > wrote: > > > > Hi Pulsar Community, > > > > This is the vote thread for PIP 289: > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/2090

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Pulsar 3.1.0 released

Congratulations! Enrico Il Lun 14 Ago 2023, 11:16 guo jiwei ha scritto: > The Apache Pulsar team is proud to announce Apache Pulsar version 3.1.0. > > Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on > commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics, >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept pulsar-admin-go as part of the Apache Pulsar project

+1 (binding) (Late on the train) Enrico Il Gio 10 Ago 2023, 05:39 tison ha scritto: > Hi, > > The vote for "Accept pulsar-admin-go as part of the Apache Pulsar project" > has PASSED and closed now. > > The result is as follows: > > 4 +1 binding Votes > - Yunze Xu > - tison > - mattisonchao > -

Re: [VOTE] PIP-268: Add support of topic stats/stats-internal using

I support this proposal. I can't understand if this is still a VOTE thread. If it is a VOTE thread then this is my +1 (binding) Sorry for late reply Enrico Il Gio 3 Ago 2023, 21:43 Rajan Dhabalia ha scritto: > Hi Penghui. > > I think I tried to answer most of the questions and have enough use

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for donating pulsar-admin-go to the Apache Pulsar project

+1 Thanks Enrico Il giorno lun 31 lug 2023 alle ore 17:59 Zixuan Liu ha scritto: > > This is a good idea for the Pulsar community. > > > The first one is hosting code in three repos: pulsar-admin-go, > pulsar-client-go, pulsar-auth-go. Then factor out the shared auth logics > into pulsar-auth-go

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pulsar 3.1.0 release

+1 Enrico Il giorno lun 31 lug 2023 alle ore 04:35 guo jiwei ha scritto: > > The next two weeks will be code freeze time, and I will release rc on > August 11 if everything goes well > > Regards > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 10:17 AM guo jiwei wrote: > > > I have cut the 3.1

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >