Re: [DISCUSS] ClientVersion conflict across multiple language client

2023-02-20 Thread avinash kala
+1, sounds good. On Tue, Feb 21, 2023, 12:39 PM Zixuan Liu wrote: > +1, good idea! > > Thanks, > Zixuan > > Zike Yang 于2023年2月21日周二 11:33写道: > > > Hi, all > > > > Currently, the Pulsar broker uses the field `client_version` to get > > the version of the client. The client will send the client_v

Re: [VOTE][PIP-242] Topic name restriction

2023-02-20 Thread avinash kala
+1 On Tue, Feb 21, 2023, 12:44 PM Haiting Jiang wrote: > +1 binding > > Haiting > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 3:07 PM guo jiwei wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Regards > > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:06 PM Zike Yang wrote: > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > T

Re: [VOTE][PIP-242] Topic name restriction

2023-02-20 Thread Haiting Jiang
+1 binding Haiting On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 3:07 PM guo jiwei wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > Regards > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:06 PM Zike Yang wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Zike Yang > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 1:53 PM PengHui Li wrote: > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

2023-02-20 Thread Haiting Jiang
+1 Looks great! Haiting On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:11 PM Hang Chen wrote: > > +1 > > Thanks, > Hang > > Christophe Bornet 于2023年2月20日周一 21:46写道: > > > > +1 > > > > Also, I'd like to volunteer as a release manager for this release. > > > > Christophe > > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 17 févr. 2023 à

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 2.9.5

2023-02-20 Thread Haiting Jiang
+1 Haiting On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 12:11 PM Hang Chen wrote: > > +1 > > Thanks, > Hang > > Enrico Olivelli 于2023年2月20日周一 21:11写道: > > > > +1 > > > > Enrico > > > > Il giorno lun 20 feb 2023 alle ore 10:41 Zike Yang ha > > scritto: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Zike Yang > > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] ClientVersion conflict across multiple language client

2023-02-20 Thread Zixuan Liu
+1, good idea! Thanks, Zixuan Zike Yang 于2023年2月21日周二 11:33写道: > Hi, all > > Currently, the Pulsar broker uses the field `client_version` to get > the version of the client. The client will send the client_version to > the broker through `CommandConnect` [0] during the connect or > `CommandAuth

Re: [VOTE][PIP-242] Topic name restriction

2023-02-20 Thread guo jiwei
+1 (binding) Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:06 PM Zike Yang wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Zike Yang > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 1:53 PM PengHui Li wrote: > > > > +1(binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Penghui > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:54 AM Cong Zhao wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 2.9.5

2023-02-20 Thread Hang Chen
+1 Thanks, Hang Enrico Olivelli 于2023年2月20日周一 21:11写道: > > +1 > > Enrico > > Il giorno lun 20 feb 2023 alle ore 10:41 Zike Yang ha > scritto: > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Zike Yang > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 12:57 PM wrote: > > > > > > Hello, Pulsar community: > > > > > > I'd like to p

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

2023-02-20 Thread Hang Chen
+1 Thanks, Hang Christophe Bornet 于2023年2月20日周一 21:46写道: > > +1 > > Also, I'd like to volunteer as a release manager for this release. > > Christophe > > > > > Le ven. 17 févr. 2023 à 23:44, Matteo Merli a écrit : > > > > Since the LTS release model has been formally approved, I'm proposing > >

[DISCUSS] ClientVersion conflict across multiple language client

2023-02-20 Thread Zike Yang
Hi, all Currently, the Pulsar broker uses the field `client_version` to get the version of the client. The client will send the client_version to the broker through `CommandConnect` [0] during the connect or `CommandAuthResponse ` [1] during the auth challenge. We could get the client_version from

Re: Force redirect questions from Slack to GitHub Discussions or StackOverflow?

2023-02-20 Thread Dave Fisher
We do not have the right to move an individual’s message to a platform where they have not agreed to the terms of use. We must not “force redirect”. We don’t own these questions, the person asking the question does. +1 to pinning a message to Slack channels. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > O

Re: Does anyone build UI for Pulsar?

2023-02-20 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il giorno lun 20 feb 2023 alle ore 14:41 Kiryl Valkovich ha scritto: > > Enrico, it’s easy. > > When I tried it, the basic functionality just didn’t work. > > Just make a side-by-side comparison of Pulsar Manager with any of the > following options: > - Conduktor (Commercial). > - Kafka UI by Pro

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-246: Improved PROTOBUF_NATIVE schema compatibility checks without using avro-protobuf

2023-02-20 Thread Kiryl Valkovich
[Edit] Sorry, it’s documented here: https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/2.11.x/schema-understand/#schema-compatibility-check From: Kiryl Valkovich Date: Monday, February 20, 2023 at 3:48 PM To: dev@pulsar.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-246: Improved PROTOBUF_NATIVE schema compatibility check

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-246: Improved PROTOBUF_NATIVE schema compatibility checks without using avro-protobuf

2023-02-20 Thread Kiryl Valkovich
Hm. I tend to think that for my Pulsar use case, it would be good to have the ability to implement a custom schema compatibility checker. For example, buf.build (a popular Protobuf linter and build) offers the following list of breaking rules. Half of them prefixed with FIELD_SAME_XXLANG_PACKAG

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

2023-02-20 Thread Christophe Bornet
+1 Also, I'd like to volunteer as a release manager for this release. Christophe Le ven. 17 févr. 2023 à 23:44, Matteo Merli a écrit : > > Since the LTS release model has been formally approved, I'm proposing > the following schedule for the release: > > * Tue - 2023-05-11 >- RC-1 >

Re: Does anyone build UI for Pulsar?

2023-02-20 Thread Kiryl Valkovich
Enrico, it’s easy. When I tried it, the basic functionality just didn’t work. Just make a side-by-side comparison of Pulsar Manager with any of the following options: - Conduktor (Commercial). - Kafka UI by Provectus (Apache License 2.0). - Redpanda Console (ex-Kowl) (Mixed license). I see a si

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 2.9.5

2023-02-20 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 Enrico Il giorno lun 20 feb 2023 alle ore 10:41 Zike Yang ha scritto: > > +1 > > Thanks, > Zike Yang > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 12:57 PM wrote: > > > > Hello, Pulsar community: > > > > I'd like to propose releasing Apache Pulsar 2.9.5. It's been about > > two months since 2.9.4 was released

Re: Does anyone build UI for Pulsar?

2023-02-20 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Kiryl, Il giorno lun 20 feb 2023 alle ore 12:18 Kiryl Valkovich ha scritto: > > Enrico, it seems you read only the mail message title. Sorry about that, I have re-read the message, and I have just realised that I skipped the very first line :-) I have one question. IIUC you started from scratch

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-246: Improved PROTOBUF_NATIVE schema compatibility checks without using avro-protobuf

2023-02-20 Thread SiNan Liu
It seems that we should only warn the user about changes to the field type, not define a compatibility check, or throw an exception. *Just like this: * *log.warn("proto.read.ProtobufSchema.uint64Field field type for uint64, was changed into a uint32");* I will update this in the PIP issue Alternat

Re: Does anyone build UI for Pulsar?

2023-02-20 Thread Kiryl Valkovich
Enrico, it seems you read only the mail message title. From: Enrico Olivelli Date: Monday, February 20, 2023 at 11:59 AM To: dev@pulsar.apache.org Subject: Re: Does anyone build UI for Pulsar? Kiryl, You can use the official Apache Pulsar Manager the is maintained by this community https://gith

Re: Does anyone build UI for Pulsar?

2023-02-20 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Kiryl, You can use the official Apache Pulsar Manager the is maintained by this community https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager At DataStax we also maintain this other UI that is also 100% opensource https://github.com/datastax/pulsar-admin-console For the BookKeeper part there is BKVM (BookK

Re: Force redirect questions from Slack to GitHub Discussions or StackOverflow?

2023-02-20 Thread Kiryl Valkovich
Do you mean, to do it for all messages in the #general channel (maybe only for messages that contain the question mark)? I think it makes sense. From: Asaf Mesika Date: Sunday, February 19, 2023 at 11:54 AM To: dev@pulsar.apache.org Subject: Re: Force redirect questions from Slack to GitHub Di

Re: [PROPOSAL] Roadmap for 3.0 release

2023-02-20 Thread Zike Yang
+1 Zike Yang On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 4:43 PM wrote: > > +1 > On Feb 18, 2023, 14:56 +0800, Michael Marshall , wrote: > > +1 - this timeline sounds even better :) > > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 12:41 AM Matteo Merli > > wrote: > > > > > > Ups, > > > > > > I started from the release date I was

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-246: Improved PROTOBUF_NATIVE schema compatibility checks without using avro-protobuf

2023-02-20 Thread Kiryl Valkovich
1. Sure, I didn’t mean that it's only about the required fields. 2. I found the page you are referring to. https://protobuf.dev/programming-guides/proto3/#updating QUOTE START If a number is parsed from the wire which doesn’t fit in the corresponding type, you will get the same effect as if you h

Re: [VOTE][PIP-242] Topic name restriction

2023-02-20 Thread Zike Yang
+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Zike Yang On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 1:53 PM PengHui Li wrote: > > +1(binding) > > Thanks, > Penghui > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:54 AM Cong Zhao wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Cong > > > > On 2023/02/18 08:58:26 mattisonc...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Hi

Does anyone build UI for Pulsar?

2023-02-20 Thread Kiryl Valkovich
Hi everyone! Does anyone personally or some company work on UI for Pulsar other than pulsar-manager or pulsar-admin-console? I understand that StreamNative and DataStax have managed solutions and obviously work on their UI. I rather looking for an open-source or commercial tool that can be use

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 2.9.5

2023-02-20 Thread Zike Yang
+1 Thanks, Zike Yang On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 12:57 PM wrote: > > Hello, Pulsar community: > > I'd like to propose releasing Apache Pulsar 2.9.5. It's been about > two months since 2.9.4 was released. > > There are 54 PRs [0] needed to cherry-pick in branch-2.9. I will > cherry-pick these PRs for

Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-245: Subscriptions expiration for NonPersistentTopic only

2023-02-20 Thread Zike Yang
> Regarding "+1 to throw this exception in future versions." - this means you complete this issue once it throws an exception right? More precisely, I mean we could print warning logs in the next feature release 3.0.0, and throw exceptions in 3.1.0. We better give users time to transition and modi

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Node.js Client Release 1.8.1 Candidate 1

2023-02-20 Thread Nozomi Kurihara
+1 (binding) * checked license headers * verified checksum and signature * install from npm and run producer/consumer Thanks, Nozomi 2023年2月17日(金) 19:12 Baodi Shi : > Hi everyone, > > This is the first release candidate for Apache Pulsar Node.js client, > version 1.8.1. > > It fixes the followi

Re: [Vote] PIP-245: Make subscriptions of non-persistent topic non-durable

2023-02-20 Thread Zike Yang
Hi, Jiuming, Overall looks good to me. Left some comments for the Compatibility section: > In the next release after 2.11.1, if users want to create Durable > subscriptions on NonPersistentTopic, will throw an exception. I think this is an improvement but not a bug fix. Right? The next feature