Hi Pulsarers,
To move [PIP 112: Generate Release Notes Automatically] forward, we need to
define the Pulsar Release Notes Architecture, which only includes major
changes (important features/enhancements/bug fixes) in list form rather
than a raw dump of PRs.
Here [2] is the draft, feel free to com
> If we want to hold that the DLQ is not a normal topic, then I can see
> why we would have a DLQ specific feature here.
I think that, good or bad, the impression that users have that the DLQ
is not a "normal" topic comes from 2 factors:
1. The experience with traditional messaging systems JMS an
> It looks like a feature that supports retaining data while no subscriptions.
Yes, that is my proposed feature. How we handle messages on a topic
with an empty set of subscriptions is a design decision.
Note that when there are no subscriptions for a topic, the following two
statements are both
+1 - assuming we ensure that the `ThresholdShedder` has unit test coverage.
Thanks,
Michael
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 9:53 PM r...@apache.org
wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> --
>
> Thanks
> Xiaolong Ran
>
> Haiting Jiang 于2022年1月12日周三 09:52写道：
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 2022/01/10 06:47:44 Hang Chen w
+1 (non-binding)
--
Thanks
Xiaolong Ran
Haiting Jiang 于2022年1月12日周三 09:52写道：
> +1
>
> On 2022/01/10 06:47:44 Hang Chen wrote:
> > This is the voting thread for PIP-122. It will stay open for at least 48
> > hours.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13340
> >
> > Pasted below for q
+1 (non-binding)
--
Thanks
Xiaolong Ran
Zike Yang 于2022年1月12日周三 09:58写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:52 AM Haiting Jiang
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On 2022/01/12 00:09:26 Matteo Merli wrote:
> > > +1
> > > --
> > > Matteo Merli
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 1
+1 (non-binding)
--
Thanks
Xiaolong Ran
Neng Lu 于2022年1月12日周三 04:45写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:19 AM Lan Liang wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Lan Liang
> > On 12/23/2021 19:21，Haiting Jiang wrote：
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Haiting
> >
> >
+1 (non-binding)
--
Thanks
Xiaolong Ran
mattison chao 于2022年1月12日周三 10:15写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 09:59, Zike Yang
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:58 AM Haiting Jiang
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the voting thread for PIP-132. It w
Hello everyone:
At present, all our PIP and related function changes are mainly in the Java
language, and all new functions will be merged into the Java SDK first, but
for SDKs in other languages, this is completely a black box, they don't
know what changes or optimizations have been made on the J
+1 Good Job. Looking forward to this feature.
Best,
Hang
PengHui Li 于2022年1月12日周三 10:54写道：
>
> +1 It's a nice approach for making sure the ledger can be deleted correctly.
>
> Regards,
> Penghui
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:23 AM Zhanpeng Wu
> wrote:
>
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/iss
+1 It's a nice approach for making sure the ledger can be deleted correctly.
Regards,
Penghui
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:23 AM Zhanpeng Wu
wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13526
>
>
>
> ## Motivation
>
> Under the current ledger-trimming design in
> `org.apache.bookkeeper.m
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13526
## Motivation
Under the current ledger-trimming design in
`org.apache.bookkeeper.mledger.impl.ManagedLedgerImpl#internalTrimLedgers`,
we need to collect those ledgers that need to be deleted first, and then
perform the asynchronous deletion of t
+1
Haiting Jiang 於 2022年1月12日 週三 09:50 寫道：
> +1
>
> On 2022/01/12 01:44:21 PengHui Li wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Penghui
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 8:39 AM mattison chao
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 08:09, Matteo Merli wrote:
> > >
> > > > https://github.com/apach
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 09:59, Zike Yang
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:58 AM Haiting Jiang
> wrote:
> >
> > This is the voting thread for PIP-132. It will stay open for at least 48
> hours.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13591
> >
> >
+1 (binding)
Best,
Hang
Zike Yang 于2022年1月12日周三 09:59写道：
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:58 AM Haiting Jiang wrote:
> >
> > This is the voting thread for PIP-132. It will stay open for at least 48
> > hours.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13591
> >
> > Paste
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:58 AM Haiting Jiang wrote:
>
> This is the voting thread for PIP-132. It will stay open for at least 48
> hours.
>
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13591
>
> Pasted below for quoting convenience.
>
>
>
> ## Motivation
>
> Currently, Pulsar
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:52 AM Haiting Jiang wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 2022/01/12 00:09:26 Matteo Merli wrote:
> > +1
> > --
> > Matteo Merli
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:07 PM Neng Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:40 AM PengHu
This is the voting thread for PIP-132. It will stay open for at least 48 hours.
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13591
Pasted below for quoting convenience.
## Motivation
Currently, Pulsar client (Java) only checks payload size for max message size
validation.
Client throws Timeo
+1
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 09:52, Haiting Jiang wrote:
> +1
>
> On 2022/01/12 00:09:26 Matteo Merli wrote:
> > +1
> > --
> > Matteo Merli
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:07 PM Neng Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:40 AM PengHui Li
> wrote:
>
+1
On 2022/01/12 00:09:26 Matteo Merli wrote:
> +1
> --
> Matteo Merli
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:07 PM Neng Lu wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:40 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Penghui
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 4:38 P
+1
On 2022/01/10 06:47:44 Hang Chen wrote:
> This is the voting thread for PIP-122. It will stay open for at least 48
> hours.
>
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13340
>
> Pasted below for quoting convenience.
>
>
>
> ### Motivation
> The ThresholdShedder load balance policy sinc
+1
On 2022/01/12 01:44:21 PengHui Li wrote:
> +1
>
> Penghui
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 8:39 AM mattison chao
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 08:09, Matteo Merli wrote:
> >
> > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13717
> > >
> > > -
> > >
> > > ## Motivation
> > >
+1
Penghui
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 8:39 AM mattison chao
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 08:09, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13717
> >
> > -
> >
> > ## Motivation
> >
> > Since all the pieces that composed the proposal in PIP-45 were finally
> >
+1
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 08:09, Matteo Merli wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13717
>
> -
>
> ## Motivation
>
> Since all the pieces that composed the proposal in PIP-45 were finally
> merged
> and are currently ready for 2.10 release, it is now possible to add other
> metad
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:07 PM Neng Lu wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:40 AM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Penghui
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 4:38 PM Enrico Olivelli
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Enrico
> > >
>
+1
--
Matteo Merli
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:05 PM Neng Lu wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:39 AM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il giorno lun 10 gen 2022 alle ore 07:47 Hang Chen
> > ha scritto:
> >
> > >
> > > This is the voting
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13717
-
## Motivation
Since all the pieces that composed the proposal in PIP-45 were finally merged
and are currently ready for 2.10 release, it is now possible to add other
metadata backends that can be used to support a BookKeeper + Pulsar cluster.
Thank you for posting your PIP !
I am sharing some of Neng's concerns.
We should define clearly how security works.
Also, currently the function defines some "namespace" for the state
storage, and we recently added support for custom state storage
implementation. With this change each function wi
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:19 AM Lan Liang wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Lan Liang
> On 12/23/2021 19:21，Haiting Jiang wrote：
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Haiting
>
> On 2021/12/23 05:35:03 Michael Marshall wrote:
> +1
>
> - Michael
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 6:18 PM Sijie Guo
Before we advance further, we first need to get on the same page of the
pros and cons of allowing this feature.
If functions can access (especially the write access) other functions'
state, the data ownership will be a mess, isolation is broken and data
security might be compromised.
On Wed,
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:40 AM PengHui Li wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Penghui
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 4:38 PM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il giorno lun 10 gen 2022 alle ore 07:45 Hang Chen
> > ha scritto:
> > >
> > > This is the votin
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 12:39 AM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno lun 10 gen 2022 alle ore 07:47 Hang Chen
> ha scritto:
>
> >
> > This is the voting thread for PIP-122. It will stay open for at least 48
> > hours.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache
32 matches
Mail list logo
