+1 (binding)

Best,
Hang

Zike Yang <zky...@streamnative.io.invalid> 于2022年1月12日周三 09:59写道:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:58 AM Haiting Jiang <jianghait...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the voting thread for PIP-132. It will stay open for at least 48 
> > hours.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13591
> >
> > Pasted below for quoting convenience.
> >
> > ----
> >
> > ## Motivation
> >
> > Currently, Pulsar client (Java) only checks payload size for max message 
> > size validation.
> >
> > Client throws TimeoutException if we produce a message with too many 
> > properties, see [1].
> > But the root cause is that is trigged TooLongFrameException in broker 
> > server.
> >
> > In this PIP, I propose to include message header size when check 
> > maxMessageSize of non-batch
> > messages, this brings the following benefits.
> > 1. Clients can throw InvalidMessageException immediately if properties 
> > takes too much storage space.
> > 2. This will make the behaviour consistent with topic level max message 
> > size check in broker.
> > 3. Strictly limit the entry size less than maxMessageSize, avoid sending 
> > message to bookkeeper failed.
> >
> > ## Goal
> >
> > Include message header size when check maxMessageSize for non-batch message 
> > on the client side.
> >
> > ## Implementation
> >
> > ```
> > // Add a size check in 
> > org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.ProducerImpl#processOpSendMsg
> > if (op.msg != null // for non-batch messages only
> > && op.getMessageHeaderAndPayloadSize() > ClientCnx.getMaxMessageSize()) {
> > // finish send op with InvalidMessageException
> > releaseSemaphoreForSendOp(op);
> > op.sendComplete(new PulsarClientException(new InvalidMessageException, 
> > op.sequenceId));
> > }
> >
> >
> > // 
> > org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.ProducerImpl.OpSendMsg#getMessageHeaderAndPayloadSize
> >
> > public int getMessageHeaderAndPayloadSize() {
> > ByteBuf cmdHeader = cmd.getFirst();
> > cmdHeader.markReaderIndex();
> > int totalSize = cmdHeader.readInt();
> > int cmdSize = cmdHeader.readInt();
> > int msgHeadersAndPayloadSize = totalSize - cmdSize - 4;
> > cmdHeader.resetReaderIndex();
> > return msgHeadersAndPayloadSize;
> > }
> > ```
> >
> > ## Reject Alternatives
> > Add a new property like "maxPropertiesSize" or "maxHeaderSize" in 
> > broker.conf and pass it to
> > client like maxMessageSize. But the implementation is much more complex, 
> > and don't have the
> > benefit 2 and 3 mentioned in Motivation.
> >
> > ## Compatibility Issue
> > As a matter of fact, this PIP narrows down the sendable range. Previously, 
> > when maxMessageSize
> > is 1KB, it's ok to send message with 1KB properties and 1KB payload. But 
> > with this PIP, the
> > sending will fail with InvalidMessageException.
> >
> > One conservative way is to add a boolean config "includeHeaderInSizeCheck" 
> > to enable this
> > feature. But I think it's OK to enable this directly as it's more 
> > reasonable, and I don't see good
> > migration plan if we add a config for this.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13560
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Haiting Jiang
>
>
>
> --
> Zike Yang

Reply via email to