Looks like the new image broken the CPP build.
I will try to use the old Dockerfile to build the
"apache/pulsar/pulsar-build" image
to make sure our CI back to normal.
Here is the issue: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/9682
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 05:08, Ali Ahmed wrote:
> I have pushed
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Guangning
丛搏 于2021年2月23日周二 上午9:50写道：
> +1
>
> On 2021/02/09 05:46:48, xiaolong ran wrote:
> > Hi everyone,>
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> 0.4.0, as follows:>
> > [ ] +1, Approve the release>
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the rele
+1
On 2021/02/09 05:46:48, xiaolong ran wrote:
> Hi everyone,>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.4.0, as
> follows:>
> [ ] +1, Approve the release>
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)>
>
> This is the first release ca
Matteo - Thank you for providing the context!
Yes. It is related to gRPC pulled by the state requirements.
- Sijie
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:03 PM Matteo Merli
wrote:
> Yes, there are a bunch of dependencies that are only needed for state
> store, such as the bk state store client and everyth
+1 (binding)
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:03 PM PengHui Li wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
> Penghui
> On Feb 22, 2021, 11:34 PM +0800, ran leon , wrote:
> > Hi long:
> >
> > That's so cool! +1
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Ran
> >
> >
> > On 2021/02/09 05:46:48, xiaolong ran w
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Penghui
On Feb 22, 2021, 11:34 PM +0800, ran leon , wrote:
> Hi long:
>
> That's so cool! +1
>
> Best regards
>
> Ran
>
>
> On 2021/02/09 05:46:48, xiaolong ran wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.4.0,
> > as foll
I have pushed the new image to "apachepulsar/pulsar-build:ubuntu-16.04"
-Ali
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 5:05 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hello,
> we have merged a change to the Pulsar Builder image in order to allow
> builds to JDK11 (the default is still JDK8)
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/p
Yes, there are a bunch of dependencies that are only needed for state
store, such as the bk state store client and everything it's pulling
in, with the biggest offender being GRPC client lib.
--
Matteo Merli
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:59 AM Sanjeev Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> IIUC, its because of the
IIUC, its because of the various state store related dependencies that are
polluting this?
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:48 AM Jerry Peng
wrote:
> [ External sender. Exercise caution. ]
>
> Hi Sijie,
>
> Are you referring to the fact that the Pulsar python package (wheel
> package) includes both pu
Hi Sijie,
Are you referring to the fact that the Pulsar python package (wheel
package) includes both pub/sub API and the function API? I If so, why are
there a lot of dependencies being pulled in? For Pulsar Python Functions,
shouldn't only the following files be pulled into the python package?
iamrmin opened a new issue #141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/141
It would be great to have a callback at Client level that trigger if
connection break in-between.
This is an automated message fro
iamrmin commented on issue #93:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/issues/93#issuecomment-783534180
Client in-general. also an option to bind event in case of connection
interruption.
This is an automated mes
Hi long:
That's so cool! +1
Best regards
Ran
On 2021/02/09 05:46:48, xiaolong ran wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.4.0, as
> follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comme
Hello,
we have merged a change to the Pulsar Builder image in order to allow
builds to JDK11 (the default is still JDK8)
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9609
Can you please publish the new image to Dockerhub ?
The new image also contains:
- Python 3 runtime (together with Python 2.7)
- Upgr
+1
- Verified the checksum
- Ran producer and consumer
Same as Masahiro, the public key of gpg is not there. Maybe need to upload
the public key
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 2:24 PM Masahiro Sakamoto
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified the checksum
> - Ran producer and consumer
>
> However, I also
Hi,
Currently, the python pulsar client couples function API together with
Pub/Sub API. That means the python client pulls in a lot of unnecessary
dependencies for people who only use pub/sub API.
As discussed in the community meeting last week, I am starting an email
thread for discussing it. I
Hi all,
Apologized that I didn't send out the summary.
The meeting minutes can be found at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19dXkVXeU2q_nHmkG8zURjKnYlvD96TbKf5KjYyASsOE/edit#
I forgot to record the 2/16 meeting. So no recording for 2/16 meeting.
The 2/18 meeting can be found at
https://github
That's kind reminder, thank you Yong~
Best Regards,
Jennifer
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:59 PM Yong Zhang
wrote:
> Thank you guys.
>
> I am clean up the PRs which are marked with the label `release/2.7.1`.
> If you have PR which marked the `release/2.7.1`, please take a look
> and make it merged
Thank you guys.
I am clean up the PRs which are marked with the label `release/2.7.1`.
If you have PR which marked the `release/2.7.1`, please take a look
and make it merged as soon as possible, otherwise, it will be pushed
into the next release.
Thanks for your help!
Yong Zhang
On Mon, 22 Feb 2
Rajan,
I can pick up
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/9644 Replace local ZooKeeper and
cache access from PulsarService and replace with Metadata-store API
can you please assign the issue to me ?
Enrico
Il giorno sab 20 feb 2021 alle ore 01:15 Rajan Dhabalia <
rdhaba...@apache.org> ha scri
20 matches
Mail list logo
