Jenkins build is back to normal : pulsar-website-build #805

See

[GitHub] [pulsar-client-node] hrsakai commented on issue #56: Add listener support for consumer

hrsakai commented on issue #56: Add listener support for consumer URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/56#issuecomment-550780779 I see. I will check for new modifications. This is an automated message from

Re: [DISCUSS] : PIP 47: Time Based Release Plan For Apache Pulsar

Hello everyone: About this proposal, do you have other concern about adopting the proposal. If so, please provide specific comments, thanks. -- Thanks Xiaolong Ran > 在 2019年10月28日，下午5:21，xiaolong ran 写道： > > Hi all committers: > > It has been more than two months since the 2.4.1 release

Re: [VOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

Thanks Dave and Sijie feedback. I will rescind this VOTE, and ping the discussion thread to see if there are any other concern about adopting the proposal. Make sure the proposal has been properly discussed. -- Thanks Xiaolong Ran > 在 2019年11月7日，上午11:44，Sijie Guo 写道： > > Hi Xiaolong, >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

Hi Xiaolong, I see the community is willing to see a time based release plan to deliver releases much faster. However as Dave pointed out, you have to first ping the discussion thread to see if there are any other concerns about adopting a time based release plan (since the plan has been successf

Re: [VOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

> This proposal has NOT been properly discussed in the Apache Way on the > mailing list. There has been absolutely no discussion of this policy. There > has been no attempt to reach consensus. In fact, i sent a discussion about PIP-47 a few days ago. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6509f01

Re: [VOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

-1 (binding) This proposal has NOT been properly discussed in the Apache Way on the mailing list. There has been absolutely no discussion of this policy. There has been no attempt to reach consensus. Apache projects do NOT proceed like this. Please rescind this VOTE! Start a proper discussion

Re: [VOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

+1 non-binding - lan.liang On 11/7/2019 10:57，PengHui Li wrote： +1 binding Guangning E 于2019年11月7日周四 上午10:54写道： +1 non binding Thanks, Guangning Yuva raj 于2019年11月6日周三 下午6:37写道： +1 non binding On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 11:18, xiaolong ran wrote: Hi everyone Please review and vote on

Re: [VOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

+1 binding Guangning E 于2019年11月7日周四 上午10:54写道： > +1 non binding > > Thanks, > Guangning > > Yuva raj 于2019年11月6日周三 下午6:37写道： > > > +1 non binding > > > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 11:18, xiaolong ran > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi everyone > > > > > > Please review and vote on the PIP-47 propose, > >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

+1 Thanks, Yong On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 18:37, Yuva raj wrote: > +1 non binding > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 11:18, xiaolong ran > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone > > > > Please review and vote on the PIP-47 propose, > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-47%3A-Time-Based-Release-Plan >

Re: [VOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

+1 non binding Thanks, Guangning Yuva raj 于2019年11月6日周三 下午6:37写道： > +1 non binding > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 11:18, xiaolong ran > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone > > > > Please review and vote on the PIP-47 propose, > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-47%3A-Time-Based-Release-Plan >

[GitHub] [pulsar-client-node] gperinazzo commented on issue #56: Add listener support for consumer

gperinazzo commented on issue #56: Add listener support for consumer URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node/pull/56#issuecomment-550497192 I found a way to pass the original consumer pointer into the message listener, so it doesn't have to wait for the ack to be called. This make

Re: Jenkins migration proposal

Let's request apache to disable apache for ci cd on a fixed date , we can enable github ci cd in parallel. -Ali On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 4:48 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > Ali, > > I checkout your branch to my fork and submit a new pull request - > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5574 > > Github Ac

Re: Jenkins migration proposal

Ali, I checkout your branch to my fork and submit a new pull request - https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5574 Github Action now can run on the forked repo. So that we can proceed the github action approach now. - Sijie On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 2:51 AM Ali Ahmed wrote: > Thanks for verifyin

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Manager release 0.1.0 Candidate 2

Thank you very much for pointing out these problems. I will fix them and launch a new vote. Thanks, Guangning Enrico Olivelli 于2019年11月6日周三 下午4:22写道： > I am sorry, but I have to cast my -1 (non binding). > > Blocker problems for the release: > - > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dev/dist/release/

Re: [VOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

+1 non binding On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 11:18, xiaolong ran wrote: > > Hi everyone > > Please review and vote on the PIP-47 propose, > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-47%3A-Time-Based-Release-Plan > > > as follows:

[VOTE] PIP-47: Time Based Release Plan

Hi everyone Please review and vote on the PIP-47 propose, https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-47%3A-Time-Based-Release-Plan as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the propose [ ] -1, Do not approve the propose (please provide sp

Re: PIP 49: Permission levels and inheritance

Hello all committers: About this PIP, do you have any other good ideas or propose. -- Thanks Xioalong Ran > 在 2019年10月30日，下午7:49，xiaolong ran 写道： > > Hello all: > > When using pulsar-admin, I found that the current permission verification > mechanism has some problems. > > We are starti

Build failed in Jenkins: pulsar-website-build #804

See Changes: [github] [Issue 5425][docs-website] Add coding guide for Apache Pulsar [47805623+Jennifer88huang] [Issue 5518][docs] Update docs mainly for Python API (#5536) [mmerli] Fix Test Assertion retry

Slack digest for #dev - 2019-11-06

2019-11-05 16:25:26 UTC - Daniel Åman: @Daniel Åman has joined the channel 2019-11-05 19:16:44 UTC - Sanchit Singhal: @Sanchit Singhal has joined the channel 2019-11-06 05:58:50 UTC - Sijie Guo: @Sijie Guo set the channel topic: Pulsar Manager 0.1.0 is out for votes! Please help review

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Manager release 0.1.0 Candidate 2

I am sorry, but I have to cast my -1 (non binding). Blocker problems for the release: - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dev/dist/release/pulsar/pulsar-manager/KEYS does not exist, so I cannot verify the signatures - There is not LICENSE/NOTICE file in the convenience binary file (this is not part of

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Manager release 0.1.0 Candidate 2

+1 ， non-binding - lan.liang On 11/6/2019 16:05，Yuva raj wrote： +1 On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 05:28, Guangning E wrote: Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 0.1.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please pro

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Manager release 0.1.0 Candidate 2

+1 On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 05:28, Guangning E wrote: > > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 0.1.0, > as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > It fixes the following issues: >