Re: Enabling Ratis on OM by default

+1 -Siyao On Nov 23, 2020 at 12:45:20 PM, Jitendra Pandey wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:35 PM Siddharth Wagle > wrote: > > +1 for this change. > > > Best, > > Sid > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:19 AM Arpit Agarwal > > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 23, 2020, at 1

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.1.0 release

+1 Cheers, Siyao On Jan 12, 2021 at 9:23:39 AM, Xiaoyu Yao wrote: > +1 for 1.1 release. > > Thanks, > Xiaoyu > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:34 AM Yi-Sheng, Lien wrote: > > +1 for it > > > Best > > Yi-Sheng > > > Lokesh Jain 於 2021年1月12日 週二 下午5:48 寫道： > > > > +1 > > > > > > Regards > > > Lokes

Re: Secrets committed as part of Ozone Commits

Thanks Mukul. Note that all open PRs based on master branch after Tue Mar 2 11:11:58 2021 PST (commit time of HDDS-4864) may need to be rebased due to the divergence. -Siyao On Mar 24, 2021 at 10:27:24 PM, Mukul Kumar Singh wrote: > Thanks everyone. > > I have pushed the changes to the master

[DISCUSS] Proposal to merge Ozone S3 Multi-Tenancy feature branch (HDDS-4944) into master

Hi Ozone devs, I am starting this discussion thread for proposing to merge the Ozone S3 Multi-Tenancy feature branch (HDDS-4944) to the master branch. S3 multi-tenancy allows multiple S3-accessible volumes to be created. Each volume can be managed separately by their own tenant admins via CLI

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to merge Ozone S3 Multi-Tenancy feature branch (HDDS-4944) into master

Nilotpal Nandi > > >> > > >> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 11:38 PM Uma Maheswara Rao Gangumalla < > > >> umaganguma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 for the merge. Great work team!!! > > >>> Thanks Siyao for drivi

[VOTE] Merge Ozone S3 Multi-Tenancy feature branch (HDDS-4944) into master

Dear Ozone devs, I am starting this vote thread for merging the Ozone S3 Multi-Tenancy feature branch (HDDS-4944) to the master branch. S3 multi-tenancy allows multiple S3-accessible volumes to be created. Each volume can be managed separately by their own tenant admins via CLI for tenant c

Re: [VOTE] Proposal to merge Ozone datanode side RocksDB merge feature branch (HDDS-3630) into master

+1. Good work! -Siyao On May 25, 2022 at 11:22:35 PM, guimark wrote: > +1 > > > Thanks, > Mark Gui > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 2022-05-26 13:05:17, "Lokesh Jain" wrote: > > +1 > > > Regards > > Lokesh > > > > On 26-May-2022, at 6:39 AM, Bharat Viswanadham > wrote: > > > > > > +1 f

Re: [VOTE] Merge Ozone S3 Multi-Tenancy feature branch (HDDS-4944) into master

at 3:06 PM Ethan Rose > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 2:06 PM Prashant Pogde > > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > On May 23, 2022, at 8:40 PM, Siyao Meng wrote: > > > > > > > &

[DISCUSS] Remove Ozone 0.5.0-beta from downloads page

Hi Ozone devs, It has been over 2 years since Ozone's first stable release. Just now I realized we still have 0.5.0-beta listed available for download on our website. I here propose removing the 0.5.0-beta download link from the downloads page (along with it

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove Ozone 0.5.0-beta from downloads page

supposed to hold the historical releases/data which aren’t > supposed to be used now, but just kept for future references. > > -Ayush > > > On 29-Sep-2022, at 5:20 AM, Siyao Meng wrote: > > > Hi Ozone devs, > > > It has been over 2 years since Ozone's first st

Re: [VOTE] Merging HDDS-4454 Ozone Streaming Write Pipeline into master

+1 -Siyao On Dec 15, 2022 at 1:45:02 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > Reminder: The VOTE will close tomorrow. > > Tsz-Wo > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 3:06 PM Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > > Hi Ozone Dev, > > > This is the VOTE thread following to the discussion thread > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/nt7jwrxkl

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Proposal to merge HDDS-6517 Ozone Snapshots

Hi Ozone devs, Thanks everyone. Snapshot feature branch merge is now *complete*. Snapshot feature dev from Milestone 2 will continue on the master branch. The wiki page has also been updated to reflect this. Previou

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to merge HttpFS support in Ozone feature branch (HDDS-5447-httpfs) into master

+1 -Siyao On Feb 6, 2023 at 7:04:24 PM, Siddharth Wagle wrote: > +1 for the merge. Thank you Zita for driving this with Pifta. > > Best, > Sid > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 3:29 PM Ethan Rose > wrote: > > +1 for merge, thanks Zita and Pifta! > > > - Ethan > > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 2:58 PM Zit

Re: [VOTE] Proposal to merge HttpFS support in Ozone feature branch (HDDS-5447-httpfs) into master

+1 -Siyao On Feb 28, 2023 at 8:57:00 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > +1 > Tsz-Wo > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:12 PM Sadanand Shenoy > wrote: > > +1 for merge. > > > -Sadanand > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:26 PM Yi-Sheng Lien wrote: > > > > +1 for merging it. > > > > > > Zita Dombi 於 2023年2月27日

Re: Cutting Ozone 1.3.1

+1 for a 1.3.1 patch release -Siyao On Mar 15, 2023 at 5:52:24 PM, Prashant Pogde wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > Prashant > > On Mar 15, 2023, at 4:06 PM, Neil Joshi wrote: > > > To note: HDDS-8173 > > The critical fixes minor release should include a recently uncovered issue > > HDDS-8173 with sc

Re: How to take dependency on Hadoop SNAPSHOT version

Hi Wei-Chiu, It says the snapshot maven repo is blocked from your logs: Blocked mirror for > repositories: [apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots, > default, snapshots)] -> [Help 1] > I believe It is caused by using insecure http:// maven repo by default: https://stackove

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Ozone major release 1.4.0

+1 for kicking off the 1.4.0 release process. Thanks Yiyang for volunteering to be the RM. On the snapshot feature (HDDS-6517 ) front, public APIs and proto messages should now be stable. So it wouldn't block a release with it atm. -Siyao On Ju

Re: [DISCUSS] Next Ozone major release 1.4.0

> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks @Ethan, @Prashant for the update. &

Re: Improving the Apache Ozone Website and Documentation

Thanks Ethan for the initiative. +1 for the proposal. And +1 for Docusaurus. I've played with this doc framework a few months back. It is fine overall with decent community support as far as I can tell. Versioning is great, as well as i18n. Docusaurus v2 generates an SPA

Re: [VOTE] Change the default branch for ozone-site from asf-site to master

+1 *Is there any standard among other ASF projects for which branch should be > the default?* btw hadoop-site does have asf-site as its default branch. but that is its only branch and is effectively being used as the dev branch afaict. -Siyao On Wed, Feb

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDDS-7593 (HSync and lease recovery) into master

+1 on the merge. Disclaimer: I have contributed to branch HDDS-7593. -Siyao On Jul 30, 2024 at 3:39:25 PM, Ethan Rose wrote: > Thanks Wei-Chiu, I'm ok with handling these in follow up tasks. Please > share the Jira links when you have them. This was my main concern, so the > merge is +1 from m

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ozone 1.4.1 RC1

+1 (binding) - Verified signatures - Verified checksums - Checked ./bin/ozone version output from binary tarball - Checked ./bin/ozone checknative output from binary tarball - rocks_tools_native lib check is missing, filed HDDS-11347

Re: [DISCUSS] bump minimum required Java

I am in favor of bumping the minimum JDK. We could also start experimenting with ZGC in Java 17. For Ozone in general, we could change it to require Java 11. @szets...@gmail.com Is there any particular reason we want Java 11? I am leaning towards bumping it to at least Java 17. Thanks, Siyao

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ozone 1.4.1 RC3

Good catch Ayush. It looks like -Psrc forgot to include ./tools subdir :D It needs to be included here: https://github.com/apache/ozone/blob/2236041f3aa4742917a98e99c54d079e0c243e8d/hadoop-ozone/dist/src/main/assemblies/ozone-src.xml#L78-L102 Thanks, Siyao On Nov 20, 2024 at 12:49:28 PM, Ayush

Re: Recon tests failing consistently

FYI I just tried one of them (testScmSnapshot). And I can't repro that locally either. -Siyao On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote: > I do suspect its environment related because I couldn't reproduce them > locally. > > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 11:52 AM Attila Doroszlai > wrot

Re: [VOTE] Merge branch HDDS-10239-container-reconciliation into master

+1 Thanks for all the work that has been put into this. -Siyao On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 10:39 AM Siddharth Wagle wrote: > +1 for the merge of this feature. Thank you to all who contributed to this > feature that enhances the robustness and manageability of Apache Ozone. > > - Sid > > On Mon, Jun

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace goofys

+1 mountpoint-s3 sounds promising. s3fs-fuse has lower performance than Goofys but might have the lowest friction as a replacement. -Siyao On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 11:02 AM Abhishek Pal wrote: > +1 on looking for a replacement since goofys is not being maintained. > JuiceFS seems to introduce t