r the capabilities of
OpenvSwitch?
Scott Melton
512-663-2220
smelt...@uccs.edu
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
;
>
> --
> John Fastabend Intel Corporation
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-scott
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
the swdev API. Maybe even someone in
the background that has access to a real enterprise switch can play along ;).
I hope you’re convinced from my other reply that the intent of swdev is to be
independent of OVS. If the implementation in the RFC doesn’t match the intent,
we should fix it. Th
L2/L3 world we're all familiar with. Gleaning netlink msgs isn’t
ideal for several reasons (and probably making more than a few in the audience
squeamish), but it would be a quick way to get us closer to the answer we’re
seeking which is the swdev driver model.
-scott
__
flow
> abstraction (openvswitch, the rocker dev ). The details of how the flow is
> mapped to hw lies in the corresponding switch driver code.
>
> We think rtnetlink is the api to model switch asic hw tables.
> We have a working model (Cumulus) that maps rtnetlink to switc
not thought about it in detail I believe
> that the current model you have implemented using such a scheme because
> the scheme I am suggesting maps to that of the datapath and you have
> implemented your model there.
-scott
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On Sep 4, 2014, at 9:08 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 09:30:45AM -0700, Scott Feldman wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 2:04 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> In relation to ports and
-> HW
> If a non-ovs flow interface is needed from userspace, we can extend the
> existing interface to include flows.
> I don't understand why we should replace the existing rtnetlink switchdev api
> to accommodate flows.
>
> Thanks,
> Roopa
>
-scott
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On Sep 20, 2014, at 5:51 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> On 9/20/14, 1:10 AM, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> On Sep 19, 2014, at 8:41 PM, Roopa Prabhu
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 9/19/14, 8:49 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>>
>>>> Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 05:25
specified yet, and there are no requirements to maintain
any sort of compatibility in any of the libraries.
Signed-off-by: Scott Mann
---
.travis/build.sh | 2 ++
INSTALL | 5 +
acinclude.m4 | 2 +-
configure.ac | 48
My apologies for the churn. I forgot to reply-all.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Scott Mann
Date: Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Build: shared libraries and versioning
To: Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On
Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
> > Reported-by: Gur Stavi
> > Acked-by: Ben Pfaff
> Yes. Thank you for finding it!
>
> If this has recurred, then it's probably the same kind of problem, and
> probably a similar fix is appropriate. Scott, do you have
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 08:23:13PM -0600, Scott Mann wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:53:28PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > > > > I
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 08:54:44PM -0600, Scott Mann wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 08:23:13PM -0600, Scott Mann wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 2
specified yet, and there are no requirements to
maintain any sort of compatibility in any of the libraries.
Signed-off-by: Scott Mann
---
This is v2 of the shared library build patch. Changes include:
make static build default (attribute to Ben Pfaff)
remove changes to vlog.h and await a better
Please ignore this patch as it has an incorrect commit message.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
> These changes cause shared libraries to be built by default.
> In particular, lib/libopenvwitch.so, lib/libsflow.so,
> ofproto/libofproto.so,
> and ovsdb/libovsd
no requirements to
maintain any sort of compatibility in any of the libraries.
Signed-off-by: Scott Mann
---
This is v2 of the shared library build patch. Changes include:
make static build default (attribute to Ben Pfaff)
remove changes to vlog.h and await a better fix
(attribute to Ben Pfaff
no requirements to
maintain any sort of compatibility in any of the libraries.
Signed-off-by: Scott Mann
---
This is v2 of the shared library build patch. Changes include:
make static build default (attribute to Ben Pfaff)
remove changes to vlog.h and await a better fix
(attribute to Ben Pfaff
Ben,
Yes, I will. But it will likely be this weekend before I am able to do that
(in traveling).
Scott
On Nov 4, 2014 3:51 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 02:55:39PM -0600, Scott Mann wrote:
> > These changes cause shared libraries to be built by defa
From: Scott Mann
These changes allow for the building of shared libraries by providing
the --enable-shared option to configure. In particular, lib/libopenvwitch.so,
lib/libsflow.so, ofproto/libofproto.so, and ovsdb/libovsdb.so will be built.
Original behavior of building static remains the same
Ben,
Let me know what you want me to change, if you want me to do it. I'm still
paying attention :)
-Scott
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Gurucharan Shetty
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 07:02:09PM -0800, Scott Mann wr
0, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:28:50PM -0800, Scott Mann wrote:
> > > > > Let me know what you want me to change, if you want me to do it.
> I'm still
> > > > > paying attention :)
> > > >
> > > > I folded
Eat more and gain less in my moto
This is the new way to shape your body.
http://x.co/8jbrG
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
nterface between the CMS
(and its plugin architecture) is OVSDB protocol to the OVN Northbound DB, only
the CMS and its plugin would need to be CMS Specific.
Thoughts...
-Scott Millward
24 matches
Mail list logo
