Re: [ovs-dev] Support for in_phy_port

2013-12-04 Thread Simon Horman
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 08:18:22AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:13:58PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:08:17PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 01:21:28PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:41:11AM +0

Re: [ovs-dev] Support for in_phy_port

2013-12-04 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:13:58PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:08:17PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 01:21:28PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:41:11AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > I am wondering if you would like m

Re: [ovs-dev] Support for in_phy_port

2013-12-04 Thread Simon Horman
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:08:17PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 01:21:28PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:41:11AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > I am wondering if you would like me to add support for matching on > > > in_phy_port, which appears to b

Re: [ovs-dev] Support for in_phy_port

2013-12-04 Thread Simon Horman
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 01:21:28PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:41:11AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > I am wondering if you would like me to add support for matching on > > in_phy_port, which appears to be optional. I am quite happy to do so, and > > indeed I have most of

Re: [ovs-dev] Support for in_phy_port

2013-12-02 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:41:11AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > I am wondering if you would like me to add support for matching on > in_phy_port, which appears to be optional. I am quite happy to do so, and > indeed I have most of the pieces in place to do so. However if not I wonder > if there is

Re: [ovs-dev] Support for in_phy_port

2013-12-01 Thread Simon Horman
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:12:12AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:48:36PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 03:46:23PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:24:23PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:22:47PM -0

Re: [ovs-dev] Support for in_phy_port

2013-11-26 Thread Simon Horman
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:48:36PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 03:46:23PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:24:23PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:22:47PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Simon

Re: [ovs-dev] Support for in_phy_port

2013-11-25 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 03:46:23PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:24:23PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:22:47PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:09:30AM -0800, B

Re: [ovs-dev] Support for in_phy_port

2013-11-25 Thread Simon Horman
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:24:23PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:22:47PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:09:30AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:09:55PM +0900, Simon

Re: [ovs-dev] Support for in_phy_port

2013-11-25 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:22:47PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:09:30AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:09:55PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > >> > as far as I can tell no one is actively worki

Re: [ovs-dev] Support for in_phy_port

2013-11-25 Thread Jesse Gross
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:09:30AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:09:55PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: >> > as far as I can tell no one is actively working on the following item in >> > OPENFLOW-1.1+. So I have made a star

Re: [ovs-dev] Support for in_phy_port

2013-11-25 Thread Simon Horman
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:09:30AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:09:55PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > as far as I can tell no one is actively working on the following item in > > OPENFLOW-1.1+. So I have made a start it. > > > > * The new in_phy_port field in OFPT_PACK

Re: [ovs-dev] Support for in_phy_port

2013-11-25 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:09:55PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > as far as I can tell no one is actively working on the following item in > OPENFLOW-1.1+. So I have made a start it. > > * The new in_phy_port field in OFPT_PACKET_IN needs some kind of > implementation. It has a sensible i