On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:41:11AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> I am wondering if you would like me to add support for matching on
> in_phy_port, which appears to be optional. I am quite happy to do so, and
> indeed I have most of the pieces in place to do so. However if not I wonder
> if there is anything much to be done at all as the spec states that
> in_phy_port may be omitted if it is the same as phy_port: our current plan
> is for that to always be the case.
Hmm.
I guess there is nothing to do for OF1.2+ then.
I checked what we did for OF1.1, and the answer was that we had never
implemented packet-in at all for OF1.1 (!). I sent out a pair of
patches to fix that:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2013-December/034461.html
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2013-December/034462.html
I guess no one has tested OF1.1 support yet. Not too surprising,
since it's pretty recent in OVS and hardly used at all in the wild.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
