On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:09:55PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > as far as I can tell no one is actively working on the following item in > OPENFLOW-1.1+. So I have made a start it. > > * The new in_phy_port field in OFPT_PACKET_IN needs some kind of > implementation. It has a sensible interpretation for tunnels > but in general the physical port is not in the datapath for OVS > so the value is not necessarily meaningful. We might have to > just fix it as the same as in_port. > [required for OF1.1; optional for OF1.2+]
Sounds good! I hope you're planning to do something simple. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
