Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-28 Thread Ben Pfaff
I'm catching up, stay tuned to this channel for breaking developments. On Aug 28, 2013 5:51 PM, "Simon Horman" wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:57:50PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:35:05PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 07:45:38PM -0700, Ben

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-28 Thread Simon Horman
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:57:50PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:35:05PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 07:45:38PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:38:57AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I would like to

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-20 Thread Casey Barker
OK, thanks. I'll send a follow-on with the provider header change that uses the buckets later this week. (Likewise buried in high-priority bugs...) On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:15:58AM -0700, Casey Barker wrote: > > I've got a lot more code I

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-20 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 02:35:05PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote: > On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 07:45:38PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:38:57AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to announce my intention to work on OF1.1+ Groups support for > > > Open v

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-20 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:15:58AM -0700, Casey Barker wrote: > I've got a lot more code I can upstream, but I haven't seen any reviews for > the first patch. Any comments? (Or did I submit it incorrectly?) You sent it right but I've been buried in high-priority bugs for a while. Sorry. I didn't

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-17 Thread Simon Horman
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 07:45:38PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:38:57AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to announce my intention to work on OF1.1+ Groups support for > > Open vSwtich with a particular focus on supporting the fast failover group > > t

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-13 Thread Casey Barker
I've got a lot more code I can upstream, but I haven't seen any reviews for the first patch. Any comments? (Or did I submit it incorrectly?) On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Casey Barker wrote: > OK, I just sent a patch, and I'll try to post more as time allows. > Unfortunately, I'm working from

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-09 Thread Casey Barker
OK, I just sent a patch, and I'll try to post more as time allows. Unfortunately, I'm working from a non-git repo, based off a stale snapshot of OVS, with layers of local hacks and cruft dating back to OVS 0.9 (WDP!). So it's a bit harder than it should be to upstream this stuff. Ben, I don't mean

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-07 Thread Ben Pfaff
Now it's *my* ugly uptime merge ;-( On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:04:52PM -0700, Casey Barker wrote: > Nothing like the threat of an ugly upstream merge. :) > > The bucket management and the ofproto-provider are what I really care > about, so I'll post those asap. > > Casey > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-07 Thread Casey Barker
Nothing like the threat of an ugly upstream merge. :) The bucket management and the ofproto-provider are what I really care about, so I'll post those asap. Casey On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I've seen that there's nothing like proposing an implementation of a > feature t

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-07 Thread Ben Pfaff
I've seen that there's nothing like proposing an implementation of a feature to make other implementations appear. Sure, please send what you have. If there's more than one choice then let the best code win. Thanks, Ben. On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:55:20PM -0700, Casey Barker wrote: > Hi Ben, >

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-05 Thread Simon Horman
Hi Casey, I'll let Ben answer for himself but from my point of view I think it would be helpful for you to send what you have and I would be more than happy to look at helping move things forwards from where you have got up to. On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:55:20PM -0700, Casey Barker wrote: > Hi Be

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-05 Thread Casey Barker
Hi Ben, I've had a "mostly working" implementation of groups for several months, but sadly not enough time in my schedule for a proper upstreaming effort. I don't expect to have time for at least a few more weeks. Would it help if I sent my ofproto and action bucket changes? Those were the most i

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-04 Thread Simon Horman
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 07:45:38PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:38:57AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to announce my intention to work on OF1.1+ Groups support for > > Open vSwtich with a particular focus on supporting the fast failover group > > t

Re: [ovs-dev] OF1.1+ Groups

2013-08-04 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:38:57AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to announce my intention to work on OF1.1+ Groups support for > Open vSwtich with a particular focus on supporting the fast failover group > type. > > I do not wish to tread on any toes so if anyone is already wo