Now it's *my* ugly uptime merge ;-(
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:04:52PM -0700, Casey Barker wrote: > Nothing like the threat of an ugly upstream merge. :) > > The bucket management and the ofproto-provider are what I really care > about, so I'll post those asap. > > Casey > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > I've seen that there's nothing like proposing an implementation of a > > feature to make other implementations appear. > > > > Sure, please send what you have. If there's more than one choice then > > let the best code win. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ben. > > > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:55:20PM -0700, Casey Barker wrote: > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > I've had a "mostly working" implementation of groups for several months, > > > but sadly not enough time in my schedule for a proper upstreaming > > effort. I > > > don't expect to have time for at least a few more weeks. > > > > > > Would it help if I sent my ofproto and action bucket changes? Those were > > > the most interesting bits, as I recall. I could probably get those out in > > > the next few days, but I don't think I have time to carve them up into > > > small, tractable patches. Or as a baby step, maybe I could at least send > > > you my ofproto-provider API? > > > > > > (FYI, the naming of async operation groups as "groups" in ofproto.c got > > so > > > confusing, I had to do a search/replace in my local repository, just for > > my > > > own sanity.) > > > > > > Casey > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:38:57AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I would like to announce my intention to work on OF1.1+ Groups > > support > > > > for > > > > > Open vSwtich with a particular focus on supporting the fast failover > > > > group > > > > > type. > > > > > > > > > > I do not wish to tread on any toes so if anyone is already working on > > > > this > > > > > please let me know. > > > > > > > > > > Assuming that is not the case my high-level plan is as follows: > > > > > > > > > > 1. Test and as necessary fix > > > > > "[groups RFC 2/2] Implement OpenFLow 1.1+ "groups" protocol."[1] > > > > > by Neil Zhu. > > > > > > > > I'm working on this myself and made some progress. I'll try to post a > > > > new version this week. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > dev mailing list > > > > dev@openvswitch.org > > > > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
