Hi Ben, I've had a "mostly working" implementation of groups for several months, but sadly not enough time in my schedule for a proper upstreaming effort. I don't expect to have time for at least a few more weeks.
Would it help if I sent my ofproto and action bucket changes? Those were the most interesting bits, as I recall. I could probably get those out in the next few days, but I don't think I have time to carve them up into small, tractable patches. Or as a baby step, maybe I could at least send you my ofproto-provider API? (FYI, the naming of async operation groups as "groups" in ofproto.c got so confusing, I had to do a search/replace in my local repository, just for my own sanity.) Casey On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:38:57AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to announce my intention to work on OF1.1+ Groups support > for > > Open vSwtich with a particular focus on supporting the fast failover > group > > type. > > > > I do not wish to tread on any toes so if anyone is already working on > this > > please let me know. > > > > Assuming that is not the case my high-level plan is as follows: > > > > 1. Test and as necessary fix > > "[groups RFC 2/2] Implement OpenFLow 1.1+ "groups" protocol."[1] > > by Neil Zhu. > > I'm working on this myself and made some progress. I'll try to post a > new version this week. > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
