On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:33:00AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 04:28:40PM +, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 28, 2013, at 19:09 , ext Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:17:09AM +, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN -
> > > FI/Espoo)
On Jun 28, 2013, at 19:33 , ext Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 04:28:40PM +, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 28, 2013, at 19:09 , ext Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:17:09AM +, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
>>> wrote:
>>
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 04:28:40PM +, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
>
> On Jun 28, 2013, at 19:09 , ext Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:17:09AM +, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jun 28, 2013, at 1:19 , ext Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >>> o
On Jun 28, 2013, at 19:09 , ext Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:17:09AM +, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 28, 2013, at 1:19 , ext Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>> ofproto: Use another method to find meter_id.
>>
>> OK, with the rationale that actions lists are sh
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:17:09AM +, Rajahalme, Jarno (NSN - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
>
> On Jun 28, 2013, at 1:19 , ext Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > ofproto: Use another method to find meter_id.
>
> OK, with the rationale that actions lists are short on average, so
> it does not matter scanning them twic
On Jun 28, 2013, at 1:19 , ext Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I spent some time looking at and playing with patch 4/5 "v2: ofproto:
> Implement OpenFlow 1.3 meter table." and decided that there was a fair bit
> that I wanted to tweak. This series represent what I came up with:
>
> IMPORTANT: In this series
I spent some time looking at and playing with patch 4/5 "v2: ofproto:
Implement OpenFlow 1.3 meter table." and decided that there was a fair bit
that I wanted to tweak. This series represent what I came up with:
IMPORTANT: In this series, I intend to squash all the patches after
"Implement OpenFl