On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 02:39:52PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> > I believe that the following may be simplified to "dev->carrier =
> > change->running":
>
> Yes, I agree. However, in a future patch of the series, I need to
> update the carrier_resets sequence number in these if blocks. If you
> I believe that the following may be simplified to "dev->carrier =
> change->running":
Yes, I agree. However, in a future patch of the series, I need to
update the carrier_resets sequence number in these if blocks. If you
like I can change it in this patch, but the final code is going to end
up
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:10:23PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Before this patch, the carrier of a linux device was only updated
> if requested by a caller. This patch updates it whenever it
> changes.
I believe that the following may be simplified to "dev->carrier =
change->running":
> +
Before this patch, the carrier of a linux device was only updated
if requested by a caller. This patch updates it whenever it
changes.
---
lib/netdev-linux.c | 128 +--
1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/netdev-lin
