On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:00:05PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> > Commit acf608 (ofproto-dpif: Use a single underlying datapath across
> > multiple bridges.) causes datapath flows from deleted ports to not be
> > removed. The issue is that th
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:00:05PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> Commit acf608 (ofproto-dpif: Use a single underlying datapath across
> multiple bridges.) causes datapath flows from deleted ports to not be
> removed. The issue is that the code that bulk deletes old flows doesn't
> know the datapat
Commit acf608 (ofproto-dpif: Use a single underlying datapath across
multiple bridges.) causes datapath flows from deleted ports to not be
removed. The issue is that the code that bulk deletes old flows doesn't
know the datapath port number that makes up the datapath flow
definition. This commit
