On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:00:05PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote: > Commit acf608 (ofproto-dpif: Use a single underlying datapath across > multiple bridges.) causes datapath flows from deleted ports to not be > removed. The issue is that the code that bulk deletes old flows doesn't > know the datapath port number that makes up the datapath flow > definition. This commit keeps track of the datapath port in the facet > for use when the datapath flow eventually needs to be removed. > > Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com>
Would you mind adding some rationale to the comment on the 'odp_in_port' member in struct subfacet? Otherwise I'll come along in a few months and have to figure out why we need this. Otherwise this looks good, thank you. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
