On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:21:52PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> I changed the comment accordingly and pushed the series. Thanks for
> the reviews, and have a nice long weekend!
You're welcome. You too!
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://
On Aug 29, 2014, at 2:31 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 02:10:42PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> Seq objects would be really hard to use if they did not provide
>> acquire-release semantics. Currently they do that via
>> ovs_mutex_lock()/ovs_mutex_unlock(), respectively. Doc
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 02:10:42PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Seq objects would be really hard to use if they did not provide
> acquire-release semantics. Currently they do that via
> ovs_mutex_lock()/ovs_mutex_unlock(), respectively. Document the
> behavior so that it is safer to rely on th
Seq objects would be really hard to use if they did not provide
acquire-release semantics. Currently they do that via
ovs_mutex_lock()/ovs_mutex_unlock(), respectively. Document the
behavior so that it is safer to rely on that elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
---
lib/ovs-thread.c |
