On Aug 29, 2014, at 2:31 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 02:10:42PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: >> Seq objects would be really hard to use if they did not provide >> acquire-release semantics. Currently they do that via >> ovs_mutex_lock()/ovs_mutex_unlock(), respectively. Document the >> behavior so that it is safer to rely on that elsewhere. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com> > > Only one thread calls seq_change() but every thread calls seq_read(), > so I'd expect that it's seq_read that really does the synchronization > here. Anyway, with that one quibble I'm happy with this, thanks. >
I changed the comment accordingly and pushed the series. Thanks for the reviews, and have a nice long weekend! Jarno > Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
