On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 02:10:42PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > Seq objects would be really hard to use if they did not provide > acquire-release semantics. Currently they do that via > ovs_mutex_lock()/ovs_mutex_unlock(), respectively. Document the > behavior so that it is safer to rely on that elsewhere. > > Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com>
Only one thread calls seq_change() but every thread calls seq_read(), so I'd expect that it's seq_read that really does the synchronization here. Anyway, with that one quibble I'm happy with this, thanks. Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
