On Oct 11, 2012, at 4:52 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
> wrote:
>> On Oct 11, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
>>> wrote:
On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Pravin Shela
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>>>
Patch looks good, I have few comments inli
On Oct 11, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>>
>>> Patch looks good, I have few comments inlined.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>
>> Patch looks good, I have few comments inlined.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>>> This is a first pass at providing a tun_key which can be
>>>
On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> Patch looks good, I have few comments inlined.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>> This is a first pass at providing a tun_key which can be
>> used as the basis for flow-based tunnelling. The
>> tun_key includes and
On Oct 11, 2012, at 9:32 AM, "Kyle Mestery (kmestery)"
wrote:
> Thanks for the review, most of this is easy to address
> On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>
>> Patch looks good, I have few comments inlined.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>>> Thi
Thanks for the review, most of this is easy to address
On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> Patch looks good, I have few comments inlined.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>> This is a first pass at providing a tun_key which can be
>> used as the basis
* Pravin Shelar (pshe...@nicira.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> > @@ -458,6 +477,9 @@ int ovs_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct
> > sk_buff *skb)
> > struct sw_flow_actions *acts =
> > rcu_dereference(OVS_CB(skb)->flow->sf_acts);
> >
Patch looks good, I have few comments inlined.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> This is a first pass at providing a tun_key which can be
> used as the basis for flow-based tunnelling. The
> tun_key includes and replaces the tun_id in both struct
> ovs_skb_cb and struct sw_t
This is a first pass at providing a tun_key which can be
used as the basis for flow-based tunnelling. The
tun_key includes and replaces the tun_id in both struct
ovs_skb_cb and struct sw_tun_key.
This patch allows all existing tun_id behaviour to still work. Existing
users of tun_id are redirected
10 matches
Mail list logo
