On Oct 11, 2012, at 4:52 PM, Pravin Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
> <kmest...@cisco.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 11, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Pravin Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
>>> <kmest...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Oct 10, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Pravin Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Patch looks good, I have few comments inlined.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kyle Mestery <kmest...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>>> This is a first pass at providing a tun_key which can be
>>>>>> used as the basis for flow-based tunnelling. The
>>>>>> tun_key includes and replaces the tun_id in both struct
>>>>>> ovs_skb_cb and struct sw_tun_key.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This patch allows all existing tun_id behaviour to still work. Existing
>>>>>> users of tun_id are redirected to tun_key->tun_id to retain 
>>>>>> compatibility.
>>>>>> However, when the userspace code is updated to make use of the new 
>>>>>> tun_key,
>>>>>> the old behaviour will be deprecated and removed.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> NOTE: With these changes, the tunneling code no longer assumes input and
>>>>>> output keys are symmetric.  If they are not, PMTUD needs to be disabled
>>>>>> for tunneling to work.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kyle Mestery <kmest...@cisco.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au>
>>>>>> Cc: Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> V6:
>>>>>> - Fix more comments addressed from Jesse.
>>>>>> V5:
>>>>>> - Address another round of comments from Jesse.
>>>>>> V4:
>>>>>> - Address 2 comments from Jesse:
>>>>>> - When processing actions, if OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key is NULL, point it at 
>>>>>> one
>>>>>>  on the stack temporarily. This goes away when we remove the ability to 
>>>>>> set
>>>>>>  tun_id outside the scope of tun_key.
>>>>>> - Move tun_key to the end of struct sw_flow_key.
>>>>>> V3:
>>>>>> - Fix issues found during review by Jesse.
>>>>>> - Add a NEWS entry around tunnel code no longer assuming symmetric input 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> output tunnel keys.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> V2:
>>>>>> - Fix blank line addition/removal found by Simon.
>>>>>> - Fix hex printing output found by Simon.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> NEWS                        |   3 ++
>>>>>> datapath/actions.c          |  38 +++++++++++++----
>>>>>> datapath/datapath.c         |  10 ++++-
>>>>>> datapath/datapath.h         |   5 ++-
>>>>>> datapath/flow.c             |  64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>>> datapath/flow.h             |  12 ++++--
>>>>>> datapath/tunnel.c           | 101 
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>>>>> datapath/tunnel.h           |  15 ++++++-
>>>>>> datapath/vport-capwap.c     |  12 +++---
>>>>>> datapath/vport-gre.c        |  15 ++++---
>>>>>> datapath/vport.c            |   2 +-
>>>>>> include/linux/openvswitch.h |  18 +++++++-
>>>>>> lib/dpif-netdev.c           |   1 +
>>>>>> lib/odp-util.c              |  15 ++++++-
>>>>>> lib/odp-util.h              |   3 +-
>>>>>> 15 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
>>>>>> index 29fd9f3..ae831e3 100644
>>>>>> --- a/NEWS
>>>>>> +++ b/NEWS
>>>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
>>>>>> post-v1.8.0
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> +    - The tunneling code no longer assumes input and output keys are 
>>>>>> symmetric.
>>>>>> +      If they are not, PMTUD needs to be disabled for tunneling to 
>>>>>> work. Note
>>>>>> +      this only applies to flow-based keys.
>>>>>>   - FreeBSD is now a supported platform, thanks to code contributions 
>>>>>> from
>>>>>>     Gaetano Catalli, Ed Maste, and Giuseppe Lettieri.
>>>>>>   - ovs-bugtool: New --ovs option to report only OVS related information.
>>>>>> diff --git a/datapath/actions.c b/datapath/actions.c
>>>>>> index ec9b595..fa8c10d 100644
>>>>>> --- a/datapath/actions.c
>>>>>> +++ b/datapath/actions.c
>>>>>> @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@
>>>>>> #include "vport.h"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> static int do_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> -                       const struct nlattr *attr, int len, bool 
>>>>>> keep_skb);
>>>>>> +                       const struct nlattr *attr, int len,
>>>>>> +                       struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel *tun_key, bool 
>>>>>> keep_skb);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> static int make_writable(struct sk_buff *skb, int write_len)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> @@ -329,11 +330,14 @@ static int sample(struct datapath *dp, struct 
>>>>>> sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>>      }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      return do_execute_actions(dp, skb, nla_data(acts_list),
>>>>>> -                                                nla_len(acts_list), 
>>>>>> true);
>>>>>> +                                                nla_len(acts_list),
>>>>>> +                                                OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key,
>>>>>> +                                                true);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> static int execute_set_action(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> -                                const struct nlattr *nested_attr)
>>>>>> +                                const struct nlattr *nested_attr,
>>>>>> +                                struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel *tun_key)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>      int err = 0;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> @@ -343,7 +347,21 @@ static int execute_set_action(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>>              break;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      case OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID:
>>>>>> -               OVS_CB(skb)->tun_id = nla_get_be64(nested_attr);
>>>>>> +               if (OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key == NULL) {
>>>>>> +                       /* If tun_key is NULL for this skb, assign it to
>>>>>> +                        * a value the caller passed in for action 
>>>>>> processing
>>>>>> +                        * and output. This can disappear once we drop 
>>>>>> support
>>>>>> +                        * for setting tun_id outside of tun_key.
>>>>>> +                        */
>>>>>> +                       memset(tun_key, 0, sizeof(struct 
>>>>>> ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel));
>>>>>> +                       OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key = tun_key;
>>>>>> +               }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +               OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->tun_id = nla_get_be64(nested_attr);
>>>>>> +               break;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +       case OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL:
>>>>>> +               OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key = nla_data(nested_attr);
>>>>>>              break;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      case OVS_KEY_ATTR_ETHERNET:
>>>>>> @@ -368,7 +386,8 @@ static int execute_set_action(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> /* Execute a list of actions against 'skb'. */
>>>>>> static int do_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>> -                       const struct nlattr *attr, int len, bool 
>>>>>> keep_skb)
>>>>>> +                       const struct nlattr *attr, int len,
>>>>>> +                       struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel *tun_key, bool 
>>>>>> keep_skb)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>      /* Every output action needs a separate clone of 'skb', but the 
>>>>>> common
>>>>>>       * case is just a single output action, so that doing a clone and
>>>>>> @@ -407,7 +426,7 @@ static int do_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, 
>>>>>> struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>>                      break;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>              case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_SET:
>>>>>> -                       err = execute_set_action(skb, nla_data(a));
>>>>>> +                       err = execute_set_action(skb, nla_data(a), 
>>>>>> tun_key);
>>>>>>                      break;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>              case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_SAMPLE:
>>>>>> @@ -458,6 +477,9 @@ int ovs_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct 
>>>>>> sk_buff *skb)
>>>>>>      struct sw_flow_actions *acts = 
>>>>>> rcu_dereference(OVS_CB(skb)->flow->sf_acts);
>>>>>>      struct loop_counter *loop;
>>>>>>      int error;
>>>>>> +       struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel tun_key;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +        memset(&tun_key, 0, sizeof(tun_key));
>>>>>> 
>>>>> tun key will zeroed while executing tunnel set action, Do we still
>>>>> need to zero it here?
>>>>> 
>>>>>>      /* Check whether we've looped too much. */
>>>>>>      loop = &__get_cpu_var(loop_counters);
>>>>>> @@ -469,9 +491,9 @@ int ovs_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct 
>>>>>> sk_buff *skb)
>>>>>>              goto out_loop;
>>>>>>      }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -       OVS_CB(skb)->tun_id = 0;
>>>>>> +       OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key = NULL;
>>>>>>      error = do_execute_actions(dp, skb, acts->actions,
>>>>>> -                                        acts->actions_len, false);
>>>>>> +                                        acts->actions_len, &tun_key, 
>>>>>> false);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      /* Check whether sub-actions looped too much. */
>>>>>>      if (unlikely(loop->looping))
>>>>>> diff --git a/datapath/datapath.c b/datapath/datapath.c
>>>>>> index a6915fb..d8a198e 100644
>>>>>> --- a/datapath/datapath.c
>>>>>> +++ b/datapath/datapath.c
>>>>>> @@ -587,12 +587,20 @@ static int validate_set(const struct nlattr *a,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      switch (key_type) {
>>>>>>      const struct ovs_key_ipv4 *ipv4_key;
>>>>>> +       const struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel *tun_key;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      case OVS_KEY_ATTR_PRIORITY:
>>>>>>      case OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID:
>>>>>>      case OVS_KEY_ATTR_ETHERNET:
>>>>>>              break;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +       case OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL:
>>>>>> +               tun_key = nla_data(ovs_key);
>>>>>> +               if (!tun_key->ipv4_dst) {
>>>>>> +                       return -EINVAL;
>>>>>> +               }
>>>>>> +               break;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>      case OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4:
>>>>>>              if (flow_key->eth.type != htons(ETH_P_IP))
>>>>>>                      return -EINVAL;
>>>>>> @@ -785,7 +793,7 @@ static int ovs_packet_cmd_execute(struct sk_buff 
>>>>>> *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      err = ovs_flow_metadata_from_nlattrs(&flow->key.phy.priority,
>>>>>>                                           &flow->key.phy.in_port,
>>>>>> -                                            &flow->key.phy.tun_id,
>>>>>> +                                            &flow->key.tun.tun_key,
>>>>>>                                           a[OVS_PACKET_ATTR_KEY]);
>>>>>>      if (err)
>>>>>>              goto err_flow_put;
>>>>>> diff --git a/datapath/datapath.h b/datapath/datapath.h
>>>>>> index affbf0e..c5df12d 100644
>>>>>> --- a/datapath/datapath.h
>>>>>> +++ b/datapath/datapath.h
>>>>>> @@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ struct datapath {
>>>>>> /**
>>>>>> * struct ovs_skb_cb - OVS data in skb CB
>>>>>> * @flow: The flow associated with this packet.  May be %NULL if no flow.
>>>>>> - * @tun_id: ID of the tunnel that encapsulated this packet.  It is 0 if 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> + * @tun_key: Key for the tunnel that encapsulated this packet. NULL if 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> + * packet is not being tunneled.
>>>>>> * @ip_summed: Consistently stores L4 checksumming status across different
>>>>>> * kernel versions.
>>>>>> * @csum_start: Stores the offset from which to start checksumming 
>>>>>> independent
>>>>>> @@ -107,7 +108,7 @@ struct datapath {
>>>>>> */
>>>>>> struct ovs_skb_cb {
>>>>>>      struct sw_flow          *flow;
>>>>>> -       __be64                  tun_id;
>>>>>> +       struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel  *tun_key;
>>>>>> #ifdef NEED_CSUM_NORMALIZE
>>>>>>      enum csum_type          ip_summed;
>>>>>>      u16                     csum_start;
>>>>>> diff --git a/datapath/flow.c b/datapath/flow.c
>>>>>> index d07337c..376f4be 100644
>>>>>> --- a/datapath/flow.c
>>>>>> +++ b/datapath/flow.c
>>>>>> @@ -629,7 +629,8 @@ int ovs_flow_extract(struct sk_buff *skb, u16 
>>>>>> in_port, struct sw_flow_key *key,
>>>>>>      memset(key, 0, sizeof(*key));
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      key->phy.priority = skb->priority;
>>>>>> -       key->phy.tun_id = OVS_CB(skb)->tun_id;
>>>>>> +       if (OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key)
>>>>>> +               key->tun.tun_key = *OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key;
>>>>>>      key->phy.in_port = in_port;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
>>>>>> @@ -847,6 +848,7 @@ const int ovs_key_lens[OVS_KEY_ATTR_MAX + 1] = {
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      /* Not upstream. */
>>>>>>      [OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID] = sizeof(__be64),
>>>>>> +       [OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL] = sizeof(struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel),
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> static int ipv4_flow_from_nlattrs(struct sw_flow_key *swkey, int 
>>>>>> *key_len,
>>>>>> @@ -1022,9 +1024,30 @@ int ovs_flow_from_nlattrs(struct sw_flow_key 
>>>>>> *swkey, int *key_lenp,
>>>>>>              swkey->phy.in_port = DP_MAX_PORTS;
>>>>>>      }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -       if (attrs & (1ULL << OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID)) {
>>>>>> -               swkey->phy.tun_id = nla_get_be64(a[OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID]);
>>>>>> +       /* OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID and OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNEL must both 
>>>>>> arrive
>>>>>> +        * together.
>>>>>> +        */
>>>>>> +       if (attrs & (1ULL << OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID) &&
>>>>>> +           attrs & (1ULL << OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL)) {
>>>>>> +               struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel *tun_key;
>>>>>> +               __be64 tun_id = 0;
>>>>>> +               tun_key = nla_data(a[OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL]);
>>>>>> +               tun_id = nla_get_be64(a[OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID]);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +               if (tun_id != tun_key->tun_id)
>>>>>> +                       return -EINVAL;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +               swkey->tun.tun_key = *tun_key;
>>>>>>              attrs &= ~(1ULL << OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID);
>>>>>> +               attrs &= ~(1ULL << OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL);
>>>>>> +       } else if (attrs & (1ULL << OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID)) {
>>>>>> +               swkey->tun.tun_key.tun_id = 
>>>>>> nla_get_be64(a[OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID]);
>>>>>> +               attrs &= ~(1ULL << OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID);
>>>>>> +       } else if (attrs & (1ULL << OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL)) {
>>>>>> +               struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel *tun_key;
>>>>>> +               tun_key = nla_data(a[OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL]);
>>>>>> +               swkey->tun.tun_key = *tun_key;
>>>>>> +               attrs &= ~(1ULL << OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL);
>>>>>>      }
>>>>> 
>>>>> While validating set action OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL, we are checking
>>>>> for ipv4_dst, I think we need similar check here.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      /* Data attributes. */
>>>>>> @@ -1162,14 +1185,16 @@ int ovs_flow_from_nlattrs(struct sw_flow_key 
>>>>>> *swkey, int *key_lenp,
>>>>>> * get the metadata, that is, the parts of the flow key that cannot be
>>>>>> * extracted from the packet itself.
>>>>>> */
>>>>>> -int ovs_flow_metadata_from_nlattrs(u32 *priority, u16 *in_port, __be64 
>>>>>> *tun_id,
>>>>>> +int ovs_flow_metadata_from_nlattrs(u32 *priority, u16 *in_port,
>>>>>> +                                  struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel *tun_key,
>>>>>>                                 const struct nlattr *attr)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>      const struct nlattr *nla;
>>>>>>      int rem;
>>>>>> +       __be64 tun_id = 0;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      *in_port = DP_MAX_PORTS;
>>>>>> -       *tun_id = 0;
>>>>>> +       memset(tun_key, 0, sizeof(*tun_key));
>>>>>>      *priority = 0;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      nla_for_each_nested(nla, attr, rem) {
>>>>>> @@ -1185,7 +1210,20 @@ int ovs_flow_metadata_from_nlattrs(u32 *priority, 
>>>>>> u16 *in_port, __be64 *tun_id,
>>>>>>                              break;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>                      case OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID:
>>>>>> -                               *tun_id = nla_get_be64(nla);
>>>>>> +                               tun_id = nla_get_be64(nla);
>>>>>> +                               if ((tun_key->tun_flags & 
>>>>>> FLOW_TNL_F_KEY) &&
>>>>>> +                                   tun_key->tun_id != tun_id)
>>>>>> +                                       return -EINVAL;
>>>>>> +                               break;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +                       case OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL:
>>>>>> +                               if (tun_key->tun_flags & FLOW_TNL_F_KEY)
>>>>>> +                                       tun_id = tun_key->tun_id;
>>>>>> +                               memcpy(tun_key, nla_data(nla),
>>>>>> +                                      sizeof(*tun_key));
>>>>>> +                               if ((tun_key->tun_flags & 
>>>>>> FLOW_TNL_F_KEY) &&
>>>>>> +                                   tun_id != tun_key->tun_id)
>>>>>> +                                       return -EINVAL;
>>>>>>                              break;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>                      case OVS_KEY_ATTR_IN_PORT:
>>>>>> @@ -1210,10 +1248,20 @@ int ovs_flow_to_nlattrs(const struct sw_flow_key 
>>>>>> *swkey, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>>>>>          nla_put_u32(skb, OVS_KEY_ATTR_PRIORITY, swkey->phy.priority))
>>>>>>              goto nla_put_failure;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -       if (swkey->phy.tun_id != cpu_to_be64(0) &&
>>>>>> -           nla_put_be64(skb, OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID, swkey->phy.tun_id))
>>>>>> +        if ((swkey->tun.tun_key.tun_flags & FLOW_TNL_F_KEY) &&
>>>>>> +           nla_put_be64(skb, OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID, 
>>>>>> swkey->tun.tun_key.tun_id))
>>>>>>              goto nla_put_failure;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +       if (swkey->tun.tun_key.ipv4_dst) {
>>>>>> +               struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel *tun_key;
>>>>>> +               nla = nla_reserve(skb, OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL,
>>>>>> +                                 sizeof(*tun_key));
>>>>>> +               if (!nla)
>>>>>> +                       goto nla_put_failure;
>>>>>> +               tun_key = nla_data(nla);
>>>>>> +               *tun_key = swkey->tun.tun_key;
>>>>>> +       }
>>>>>> +
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why are we sending both OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID and
>>>>> OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL attributed here?
>>>>> we could first check for ipv4_dst else for FLOW_TNL_F_KEY in flow key.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>      if (swkey->phy.in_port != DP_MAX_PORTS &&
>>>>>>          nla_put_u32(skb, OVS_KEY_ATTR_IN_PORT, swkey->phy.in_port))
>>>>>>              goto nla_put_failure;
>>>>>> diff --git a/datapath/flow.h b/datapath/flow.h
>>>>>> index 02c563a..4430b32 100644
>>>>>> --- a/datapath/flow.h
>>>>>> +++ b/datapath/flow.h
>>>>>> @@ -42,10 +42,12 @@ struct sw_flow_actions {
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> struct sw_flow_key {
>>>>>>      struct {
>>>>>> -               __be64  tun_id;         /* Encapsulating tunnel ID. */
>>>>>>              u32     priority;       /* Packet QoS priority. */
>>>>>>              u16     in_port;        /* Input switch port (or 
>>>>>> DP_MAX_PORTS). */
>>>>>>      } phy;
>>>>>> +        struct {
>>>>>> +               struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel tun_key;  /* Encapsulating 
>>>>>> tunnel key. */
>>>>>> +       } tun;
>>>>>>      struct {
>>>>>>              u8     src[ETH_ALEN];   /* Ethernet source address. */
>>>>>>              u8     dst[ETH_ALEN];   /* Ethernet destination address. */
>>>>>> @@ -150,6 +152,7 @@ u64 ovs_flow_used_time(unsigned long flow_jiffies);
>>>>>> *                         ------  ---  ------  -----
>>>>>> *  OVS_KEY_ATTR_PRIORITY      4    --     4      8
>>>>>> *  OVS_KEY_ATTR_TUN_ID        8    --     4     12
>>>>>> + *  OVS_KEY_ATTR_IPV4_TUNNEL  24    --     4     28
>>>>>> *  OVS_KEY_ATTR_IN_PORT       4    --     4      8
>>>>>> *  OVS_KEY_ATTR_ETHERNET     12    --     4     16
>>>>>> *  OVS_KEY_ATTR_ETHERTYPE     2     2     4      8  (outer VLAN 
>>>>>> ethertype)
>>>>>> @@ -160,14 +163,15 @@ u64 ovs_flow_used_time(unsigned long flow_jiffies);
>>>>>> *  OVS_KEY_ATTR_ICMPV6        2     2     4      8
>>>>>> *  OVS_KEY_ATTR_ND           28    --     4     32
>>>>>> *  -------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> - *  total                                       156
>>>>>> + *  total                                       184
>>>>>> */
>>>>>> -#define FLOW_BUFSIZE 156
>>>>>> +#define FLOW_BUFSIZE 184
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> int ovs_flow_to_nlattrs(const struct sw_flow_key *, struct sk_buff *);
>>>>>> int ovs_flow_from_nlattrs(struct sw_flow_key *swkey, int *key_lenp,
>>>>>>                    const struct nlattr *);
>>>>>> -int ovs_flow_metadata_from_nlattrs(u32 *priority, u16 *in_port, __be64 
>>>>>> *tun_id,
>>>>>> +int ovs_flow_metadata_from_nlattrs(u32 *priority, u16 *in_port,
>>>>>> +                                  struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel *tun_key,
>>>>>>                                 const struct nlattr *);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> #define MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE    (16 * 1024)
>>>>>> diff --git a/datapath/tunnel.c b/datapath/tunnel.c
>>>>>> index d651c11..739f098 100644
>>>>>> --- a/datapath/tunnel.c
>>>>>> +++ b/datapath/tunnel.c
>>>>>> @@ -367,9 +367,9 @@ struct vport *ovs_tnl_find_port(struct net *net, 
>>>>>> __be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
>>>>>>      return NULL;
>>>>> ñ>  }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -static void ecn_decapsulate(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 tos)
>>>>>> +static void ecn_decapsulate(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> -       if (unlikely(INET_ECN_is_ce(tos))) {
>>>>>> +       if (unlikely(INET_ECN_is_ce(OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->ipv4_tos))) {
>>>>>>              __be16 protocol = skb->protocol;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>              skb_set_network_header(skb, ETH_HLEN);
>>>>>> @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static void ecn_decapsulate(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 
>>>>>> tos)
>>>>>> * - skb->csum does not include the inner Ethernet header.
>>>>>> * - The layer pointers are undefined.
>>>>>> */
>>>>>> -void ovs_tnl_rcv(struct vport *vport, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 tos)
>>>>>> +void ovs_tnl_rcv(struct vport *vport, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>      struct ethhdr *eh;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ void ovs_tnl_rcv(struct vport *vport, struct sk_buff 
>>>>>> *skb, u8 tos)
>>>>>>      skb_clear_rxhash(skb);
>>>>>>      secpath_reset(skb);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -       ecn_decapsulate(skb, tos);
>>>>>> +       ecn_decapsulate(skb);
>>>>>>      vlan_set_tci(skb, 0);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      if (unlikely(compute_ip_summed(skb, false))) {
>>>>>> @@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ static void ipv6_build_icmp(struct sk_buff *skb, 
>>>>>> struct sk_buff *nskb,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> bool ovs_tnl_frag_needed(struct vport *vport,
>>>>>>                       const struct tnl_mutable_config *mutable,
>>>>>> -                        struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int mtu, __be64 
>>>>>> flow_key)
>>>>>> +                        struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int mtu)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>      unsigned int eth_hdr_len = ETH_HLEN;
>>>>>>      unsigned int total_length = 0, header_length = 0, payload_length;
>>>>>> @@ -697,17 +697,6 @@ bool ovs_tnl_frag_needed(struct vport *vport,
>>>>>>              ipv6_build_icmp(skb, nskb, mtu, payload_length);
>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -       /*
>>>>>> -        * Assume that flow based keys are symmetric with respect to 
>>>>>> input
>>>>>> -        * and output and use the key that we were going to put on the
>>>>>> -        * outgoing packet for the fake received packet.  If the keys are
>>>>>> -        * not symmetric then PMTUD needs to be disabled since we won't 
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> -        * any way of synthesizing packets.
>>>>>> -        */
>>>>>> -       if ((mutable->flags & (TNL_F_IN_KEY_MATCH | 
>>>>>> TNL_F_OUT_KEY_ACTION)) ==
>>>>>> -           (TNL_F_IN_KEY_MATCH | TNL_F_OUT_KEY_ACTION))
>>>>>> -               OVS_CB(nskb)->tun_id = flow_key;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>      if (unlikely(compute_ip_summed(nskb, false))) {
>>>>>>              kfree_skb(nskb);
>>>>>>              return false;
>>>>>> @@ -723,12 +712,20 @@ static bool check_mtu(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>>                    const struct tnl_mutable_config *mutable,
>>>>>>                    const struct rtable *rt, __be16 *frag_offp)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> -       bool df_inherit = mutable->flags & TNL_F_DF_INHERIT;
>>>>>> +       bool df_inherit;
>>>>>>      bool pmtud = mutable->flags & TNL_F_PMTUD;
>>>>>> -       __be16 frag_off = mutable->flags & TNL_F_DF_DEFAULT ? 
>>>>>> htons(IP_DF) : 0;
>>>>>> +       __be16 frag_off;
>>>>>>      int mtu = 0;
>>>>>>      unsigned int packet_length = skb->len - ETH_HLEN;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +       if (OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->ipv4_dst != 0) {
>>>>>> +               df_inherit = false;
>>>>>> +               frag_off = OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->tun_flags & 
>>>>>> FLOW_TNL_F_DONT_FRAGMENT;
>>>>>> +       } else {
>>>>>> +               df_inherit = mutable->flags & TNL_F_DF_INHERIT;
>>>>>> +               frag_off = mutable->flags & TNL_F_DF_DEFAULT ? 
>>>>>> htons(IP_DF) : 0;
>>>>>> +        }
>>>>>> +
>>>>> Why not set pmtud to false incase of flow-based tunneling like you did
>>>>> it for df_inherit?
>>>>> 
>>>>>>      /* Allow for one level of tagging in the packet length. */
>>>>>>      if (!vlan_tx_tag_present(skb) &&
>>>>>>          eth_hdr(skb)->h_proto == htons(ETH_P_8021Q))
>>>>>> @@ -760,8 +757,7 @@ static bool check_mtu(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>>                      mtu = max(mtu, IP_MIN_MTU);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>                      if (packet_length > mtu &&
>>>>>> -                           ovs_tnl_frag_needed(vport, mutable, skb, mtu,
>>>>>> -                                               OVS_CB(skb)->tun_id))
>>>>>> +                           ovs_tnl_frag_needed(vport, mutable, skb, 
>>>>>> mtu))
>>>>>>                              return false;
>>>>>>              }
>>>>>>      }
>>>>>> @@ -777,8 +773,7 @@ static bool check_mtu(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>>>>                      mtu = max(mtu, IPV6_MIN_MTU);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>                      if (packet_length > mtu &&
>>>>>> -                           ovs_tnl_frag_needed(vport, mutable, skb, mtu,
>>>>>> -                                               OVS_CB(skb)->tun_id))
>>>>>> +                           ovs_tnl_frag_needed(vport, mutable, skb, 
>>>>>> mtu))
>>>>>>                              return false;
>>>>>>              }
>>>>>>      }
>>>>>> @@ -1000,15 +995,16 @@ unlock:
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> static struct rtable *__find_route(const struct tnl_mutable_config 
>>>>>> *mutable,
>>>>>> -                                  u8 ipproto, u8 tos)
>>>>>> +                                  __be32 saddr, __be32 daddr, u8 
>>>>>> ipproto,
>>>>>> +                                  u8 tos)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>      /* Tunnel configuration keeps DSCP part of TOS bits, But Linux
>>>>>>       * router expect RT_TOS bits only. */
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,39)
>>>>>>      struct flowi fl = { .nl_u = { .ip4_u = {
>>>>>> -                                       .daddr = mutable->key.daddr,
>>>>>> -                                       .saddr = mutable->key.saddr,
>>>>>> +                                       .daddr = daddr,
>>>>>> +                                       .saddr = saddr,
>>>>>>                                      .tos   = RT_TOS(tos) } },
>>>>>>                                      .proto = ipproto };
>>>>>>      struct rtable *rt;
>>>>>> @@ -1018,8 +1014,8 @@ static struct rtable *__find_route(const struct 
>>>>>> tnl_mutable_config *mutable,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      return rt;
>>>>>> #else
>>>>>> -       struct flowi4 fl = { .daddr = mutable->key.daddr,
>>>>>> -                            .saddr = mutable->key.saddr,
>>>>>> +       struct flowi4 fl = { .daddr = daddr,
>>>>>> +                            .saddr = saddr,
>>>>>>                           .flowi4_tos = RT_TOS(tos),
>>>>>>                           .flowi4_proto = ipproto };
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> @@ -1029,7 +1025,8 @@ static struct rtable *__find_route(const struct 
>>>>>> tnl_mutable_config *mutable,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> static struct rtable *find_route(struct vport *vport,
>>>>>>                               const struct tnl_mutable_config *mutable,
>>>>>> -                                u8 tos, struct tnl_cache **cache)
>>>>>> +                                __be32 saddr, __be32 daddr, u8 tos,
>>>>>> +                                struct tnl_cache **cache)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>      struct tnl_vport *tnl_vport = tnl_vport_priv(vport);
>>>>>>      struct tnl_cache *cur_cache = rcu_dereference(tnl_vport->cache);
>>>>>> @@ -1037,18 +1034,21 @@ static struct rtable *find_route(struct vport 
>>>>>> *vport,
>>>>>>      *cache = NULL;
>>>>>>      tos = RT_TOS(tos);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -       if (likely(tos == RT_TOS(mutable->tos) &&
>>>>>> -           check_cache_valid(cur_cache, mutable))) {
>>>>>> +       if (daddr == mutable->key.daddr && saddr == mutable->key.saddr &&
>>>>>> +           tos == RT_TOS(mutable->tos) &&
>>>>>> +           check_cache_valid(cur_cache, mutable)) {
>>>>>>              *cache = cur_cache;
>>>>>>              return cur_cache->rt;
>>>>>>      } else {
>>>>>>              struct rtable *rt;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -               rt = __find_route(mutable, tnl_vport->tnl_ops->ipproto, 
>>>>>> tos);
>>>>>> +               rt = __find_route(mutable, saddr, daddr,
>>>>>> +                                 tnl_vport->tnl_ops->ipproto, tos);
>>>>>>              if (IS_ERR(rt))
>>>>>>                      return NULL;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -               if (likely(tos == RT_TOS(mutable->tos)))
>>>>>> +               if (daddr == mutable->key.daddr && saddr == 
>>>>>> mutable->key.saddr &&
>>>>>> +                   tos == RT_TOS(mutable->tos))
>>>>>>                      *cache = build_cache(vport, mutable, rt);
>>>>>> 
>>>>> I am not sure why checks are added on saddr and daddr here?
>>>>> header caching is not set in case of flow based tunneling to
>>>>> build_cache call is no-op anyways.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>              return rt;
>>>>>> @@ -1178,8 +1178,11 @@ int ovs_tnl_send(struct vport *vport, struct 
>>>>>> sk_buff *skb)
>>>>>>      struct rtable *rt;
>>>>>>      struct dst_entry *unattached_dst = NULL;
>>>>>>      struct tnl_cache *cache;
>>>>>> +       struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel tun_key;
>>>>>>      int sent_len = 0;
>>>>>>      __be16 frag_off = 0;
>>>>>> +       __be32 daddr;
>>>>>> +       __be32 saddr;
>>>>>>      u8 ttl;
>>>>>>      u8 inner_tos;
>>>>>>      u8 tos;
>>>>>> @@ -1207,6 +1210,13 @@ int ovs_tnl_send(struct vport *vport, struct 
>>>>>> sk_buff *skb)
>>>>>>      }
>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +       /* If OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key is NULL, point it at the local 
>>>>>> tun_key here,
>>>>>> +        * and zero it out.
>>>>>> +        */
>>>>>> +       if (OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key == NULL) {
>>>>>> +               memset(&tun_key, 0, sizeof(tun_key));
>>>>>> +               OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key = &tun_key;
>>>>>> +       }
>>>>>>      /* ToS */
>>>>>>      if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP))
>>>>>>              inner_tos = ip_hdr(skb)->tos;
>>>>>> @@ -1219,11 +1229,23 @@ int ovs_tnl_send(struct vport *vport, struct 
>>>>>> sk_buff *skb)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      if (mutable->flags & TNL_F_TOS_INHERIT)
>>>>>>              tos = inner_tos;
>>>>>> +       else if (OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->ipv4_dst != 0)
>>>>>> +               tos = OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->ipv4_tos;
>>>>>>      else
>>>>>>              tos = mutable->tos;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +       if (OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->ipv4_dst != 0)
>>>>>> +               daddr = OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->ipv4_dst;
>>>>>> +       else
>>>>>> +               daddr = mutable->key.daddr;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +       if (OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->ipv4_dst != 0)
>>>>>> +               saddr = OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->ipv4_src;
>>>>>> +       else
>>>>>> +               saddr = mutable->key.saddr;
>>>>>> +
>>>>> 
>>>>> It will be easier to read if we have one if check on
>>>>> OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->ipv4_dst which is retrieve all tunnel parameter
>>>>> for flow-based tunning and else block for campat code.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>      /* Route lookup */
>>>>>> -       rt = find_route(vport, mutable, tos, &cache);
>>>>>> +       rt = find_route(vport, mutable, saddr, daddr, tos, &cache);
>>>>>>      if (unlikely(!rt))
>>>>>>              goto error_free;
>>>>>>      if (unlikely(!cache))
>>>>>> @@ -1260,9 +1282,13 @@ int ovs_tnl_send(struct vport *vport, struct 
>>>>>> sk_buff *skb)
>>>>>>      }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      /* TTL */
>>>>>> -       ttl = mutable->ttl;
>>>>>> -       if (!ttl)
>>>>>> -               ttl = ip4_dst_hoplimit(&rt_dst(rt));
>>>>>> +       if (OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->ipv4_dst != 0)
>>>>>> +               ttl = OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->ipv4_ttl;
>>>>>> +       else {
>>>>>> +               ttl = mutable->ttl;
>>>>>> +               if (!ttl)
>>>>>> +                       ttl = ip4_dst_hoplimit(&rt_dst(rt));
>>>>>> +       }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      if (mutable->flags & TNL_F_TTL_INHERIT) {
>>>>> 
>>>>> This check could be in the compat code block, so it is less confusing.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>              if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP))
>>>>>> @@ -1442,7 +1468,8 @@ static int tnl_set_config(struct net *net, struct 
>>>>>> nlattr *options,
>>>>>>              struct net_device *dev;
>>>>>>              struct rtable *rt;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -               rt = __find_route(mutable, tnl_ops->ipproto, 
>>>>>> mutable->tos);
>>>>>> +               rt = __find_route(mutable, mutable->key.saddr, 
>>>>>> mutable->key.daddr,
>>>>>> +                                 tnl_ops->ipproto, mutable->tos);
>>>>>>              if (IS_ERR(rt))
>>>>>>                      return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>>>>>>              dev = rt_dst(rt).dev;
>>>>>> diff --git a/datapath/tunnel.h b/datapath/tunnel.h
>>>>>> index 1924017..b7858d3 100644
>>>>>> --- a/datapath/tunnel.h
>>>>>> +++ b/datapath/tunnel.h
>>>>>> @@ -269,14 +269,14 @@ int ovs_tnl_set_addr(struct vport *vport, const 
>>>>>> unsigned char *addr);
>>>>>> const char *ovs_tnl_get_name(const struct vport *vport);
>>>>>> const unsigned char *ovs_tnl_get_addr(const struct vport *vport);
>>>>>> int ovs_tnl_send(struct vport *vport, struct sk_buff *skb);
>>>>>> -void ovs_tnl_rcv(struct vport *vport, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 tos);
>>>>>> +void ovs_tnl_rcv(struct vport *vport, struct sk_buff *skb);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> struct vport *ovs_tnl_find_port(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be32 
>>>>>> daddr,
>>>>>>                              __be64 key, int tunnel_type,
>>>>>>                              const struct tnl_mutable_config **mutable);
>>>>>> bool ovs_tnl_frag_needed(struct vport *vport,
>>>>>>                       const struct tnl_mutable_config *mutable,
>>>>>> -                        struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int mtu, __be64 
>>>>>> flow_key);
>>>>>> +                        struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int mtu);
>>>>>> void ovs_tnl_free_linked_skbs(struct sk_buff *skb);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> int ovs_tnl_init(void);
>>>>>> @@ -286,4 +286,15 @@ static inline struct tnl_vport 
>>>>>> *tnl_vport_priv(const struct vport *vport)
>>>>>>      return vport_priv(vport);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +static inline void tnl_tun_key_init(struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel *tun_key,
>>>>>> +                                   const struct iphdr *iph, __be64 
>>>>>> tun_id)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +       tun_key->tun_id = tun_id;
>>>>>> +       tun_key->ipv4_src = iph->saddr;
>>>>>> +       tun_key->ipv4_dst = iph->daddr;
>>>>>> +       tun_key->ipv4_tos = iph->tos;
>>>>>> +       tun_key->ipv4_ttl = iph->ttl;
>>>>>> +       tun_key->tun_flags = 0;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> #endif /* tunnel.h */
>>>>>> diff --git a/datapath/vport-capwap.c b/datapath/vport-capwap.c
>>>>>> index 05a099d..fbf50d9 100644
>>>>>> --- a/datapath/vport-capwap.c
>>>>>> +++ b/datapath/vport-capwap.c
>>>>>> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *capwap_update_header(const 
>>>>>> struct vport *vport,
>>>>>>              struct capwaphdr_wsi *wsi = (struct capwaphdr_wsi *)(cwh + 
>>>>>> 1);
>>>>>>              struct capwaphdr_wsi_key *opt = (struct capwaphdr_wsi_key 
>>>>>> *)(wsi + 1);
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -               opt->key = OVS_CB(skb)->tun_id;
>>>>>> +               opt->key = OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->tun_id;
>>>>>>      }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      udph->len = htons(skb->len - skb_transport_offset(skb));
>>>>>> @@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ static int capwap_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct 
>>>>>> sk_buff *skb)
>>>>>>      struct vport *vport;
>>>>>>      const struct tnl_mutable_config *mutable;
>>>>>>      struct iphdr *iph;
>>>>>> +       struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel tun_key;
>>>>>>      __be64 key = 0;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      if (unlikely(!pskb_may_pull(skb, CAPWAP_MIN_HLEN + ETH_HLEN)))
>>>>>> @@ -333,12 +334,11 @@ static int capwap_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct 
>>>>>> sk_buff *skb)
>>>>>>              goto error;
>>>>>>      }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -       if (mutable->flags & TNL_F_IN_KEY_MATCH)
>>>>>> -               OVS_CB(skb)->tun_id = key;
>>>>>> -       else
>>>>>> -               OVS_CB(skb)->tun_id = 0;
>>>>>> +       tnl_tun_key_init(&tun_key, iph,
>>>>>> +                    mutable->flags & TNL_F_IN_KEY_MATCH ? key : 0);
>>>>>> +       OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key = &tun_key;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -       ovs_tnl_rcv(vport, skb, iph->tos);
>>>>>> +       ovs_tnl_rcv(vport, skb);
>>>>>>      goto out;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> error:
>>>>>> diff --git a/datapath/vport-gre.c b/datapath/vport-gre.c
>>>>>> index ab89c5b..8076b1d 100644
>>>>>> --- a/datapath/vport-gre.c
>>>>>> +++ b/datapath/vport-gre.c
>>>>>> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *gre_update_header(const 
>>>>>> struct vport *vport,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      /* Work backwards over the options so the checksum is last. */
>>>>>>      if (mutable->flags & TNL_F_OUT_KEY_ACTION)
>>>>>> -               *options = be64_get_low32(OVS_CB(skb)->tun_id);
>>>>>> +               *options = be64_get_low32(OVS_CB(skb)->tun_key->tun_id);
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Here we do need check if we doing flow-based tunneling. in case of
>>>>> flow-based tunneling mutable is shared between all tunnels, so there
>>>>> is no-way to we can do port specific flags check from mutable. about
>>>>> GRE checksum, we need to check for FLOW_TNL_F_CSUM flag for doing
>>>>> checksum on a packet.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>      if (mutable->out_key || mutable->flags & TNL_F_OUT_KEY_ACTION)
>>>>>>              options--;
>>>>>> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static void gre_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info)
>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>      __skb_pull(skb, tunnel_hdr_len);
>>>>>> -       ovs_tnl_frag_needed(vport, mutable, skb, mtu, key);
>>>>>> +       ovs_tnl_frag_needed(vport, mutable, skb, mtu);
>>>>>>      __skb_push(skb, tunnel_hdr_len);
>>>>>> 
>>>>> same here, tunnel_hdr_len is stored in mutable which is going to be
>>>>> shared for all tunnels for a type in flow based tunneling, so we need
>>>>> to calculate it on packet send.
>>>>> 
>>>> I looked, and in the context of this function, tunnel_hdr_len is actually 
>>>> calculated
>>>> by the static function parse_header(), which actually is looking at the 
>>>> packet to
>>>> find it. Now, in the broader context, mutable does have a tunnel header as 
>>>> a part
>>>> of it, and if that's the tunnel header length you are concerned about, I 
>>>> agree we
>>>> need to address that. Can you confirm?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Right, I misplaced this comment. While rcv is tunnel_hlen is right, on
>>> send side tunnel_hlen needs fix.
>>> 
>> Calculating header length for each packet transmit doesn't seem efficient, 
>> but we may have
>> to go that route. Any ideas here?
>> 
> 
> I was thinking of keeping it in sw_flow and calculate it on first
> transmit. We can remove hlen mutable config and always use
> flow->tunnel_hlen even in compat mode.
> 
OK, this is what I was thinking as well. Let me redo the patch and resubmit.

Just FYI: I may not get to this for another week or so, as I'm on PTO tomorrow, 
and traveling
next week. Let me see what I can do though.

Thanks,
Kyle

> 
>> Thanks,
>> Kyle
>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Pravin.
>> 
>> 


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to