Thanks for the review :-) Pushed to master with the locking changes you
proposed.
Jarno
On Jul 3, 2014, at 1:48 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 01:47:38PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:17:17AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>>> This requires less locking
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 01:47:38PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:17:17AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> > This requires less locking and makes lockless classifier use a simpler.
>
> "a simpler" => "simpler"?
> "a simpler" => "possible"? ;-)
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajah
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:17:17AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> This requires less locking and makes lockless classifier use a simpler.
"a simpler" => "simpler"?
"a simpler" => "possible"? ;-)
> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
I think that, under the new locking rules, dpif_netdev_flow_get()
This requires less locking and makes lockless classifier use a simpler.
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
---
lib/dpif-netdev.c | 51 ---
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev.c b/lib/dpif-netdev.c
index fce
