Thanks for the review :-) Pushed to master with the locking changes you proposed.
Jarno On Jul 3, 2014, at 1:48 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 01:47:38PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:17:17AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: >>> This requires less locking and makes lockless classifier use a simpler. >> >> "a simpler" => "simpler"? >> "a simpler" => "possible"? ;-) >> >>> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <[email protected]> >> >> I think that, under the new locking rules, dpif_netdev_flow_get() and >> dpif_netdev_flow_dump_next() could skip taking dp->cls.rwlock. > > Oh, I forgot: > > Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
