On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:17:17AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > This requires less locking and makes lockless classifier use a simpler.
"a simpler" => "simpler"? "a simpler" => "possible"? ;-) > Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com> I think that, under the new locking rules, dpif_netdev_flow_get() and dpif_netdev_flow_dump_next() could skip taking dp->cls.rwlock. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
