On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 12:32:45PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> It's possible to have an incoming packet that matches both a unicast
>> and multicast tunnel if the source address corresponds to the remote_ip
>> of a unicast tunnel and the destina
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 12:32:45PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> It's possible to have an incoming packet that matches both a unicast
> and multicast tunnel if the source address corresponds to the remote_ip
> of a unicast tunnel and the destination is multicast. Currently this
> will match the mult
It's possible to have an incoming packet that matches both a unicast
and multicast tunnel if the source address corresponds to the remote_ip
of a unicast tunnel and the destination is multicast. Currently this
will match the multicast tunnel but in reality the unicast tunnel
should probably be con
