On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 12:32:45PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > It's possible to have an incoming packet that matches both a unicast > and multicast tunnel if the source address corresponds to the remote_ip > of a unicast tunnel and the destination is multicast. Currently this > will match the multicast tunnel but in reality the unicast tunnel > should probably be considered more specific. This is actually a > common situation in protocols that use a combination of multicast > for flooding and unicast for responses. > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com>
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> Should we have separate key_* counters for multicast tunnels? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
