On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 12:32:45PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: >> It's possible to have an incoming packet that matches both a unicast >> and multicast tunnel if the source address corresponds to the remote_ip >> of a unicast tunnel and the destination is multicast. Currently this >> will match the multicast tunnel but in reality the unicast tunnel >> should probably be considered more specific. This is actually a >> common situation in protocols that use a combination of multicast >> for flooding and unicast for responses. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> > > Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
Thanks, I pushed this. > Should we have separate key_* counters for multicast tunnels? It's probably worth doing. I'll send out a separate patch. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
