> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Thomas F
>
> On 6/25/15 12:39 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 06:48:20PM -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >>> Do you two have an opinion on this? If DPDK suppo
On 6/25/15 12:39 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 06:48:20PM -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Do you two have an opinion on this? If DPDK support is pretty solid now
then it makes sense to apply this to master and backport it to
b
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 06:48:20PM -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Do you two have an opinion on this? If DPDK support is pretty solid now
> > then it makes sense to apply this to master and backport it to
> > branch-2.4.
>
> Personally I woul
On 24/06/2015 02:48, "Pravin Shelar" wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> Do you two have an opinion on this? If DPDK support is pretty solid now
>> then it makes sense to apply this to master and backport it to
>> branch-2.4.
>
>Personally I would like to have better
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Do you two have an opinion on this? If DPDK support is pretty solid now
> then it makes sense to apply this to master and backport it to
> branch-2.4.
Personally I would like to have better testing with vhost, tunneling
and PMD thread manageme
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:42:15AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Do you two have an opinion on this? If DPDK support is pretty solid now
> then it makes sense to apply this to master and backport it to
> branch-2.4.
Daniele, what is your opinion?
___
dev ma
On 6/17/15 2:41 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner
---
INSTALL.DPDK.md | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
It looks like a good time to promote DPDK support before
2.4 is branched off.
What do you think?
+1
diff --git a/INSTALL.DPDK.md b/INSTALL.DPDK.md
Do you two have an opinion on this? If DPDK support is pretty solid now
then it makes sense to apply this to master and backport it to
branch-2.4.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> -Original Message-
> From: Gray, Mark D
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 9:06 AM
> To: Flavio Leitner; diproiet...@vmware.com; Traynor, Kevin
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] INSTALL.DPDK: remove experimental statement
>
> > Subject: [PATCH] INSTALL.DPDK: remove experimen
> Subject: [PATCH] INSTALL.DPDK: remove experimental statement
>
> Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner
> ---
> INSTALL.DPDK.md | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> It looks like a good time to promote DPDK support before
> 2.4 is branched off.
> What do you think?
+1 :)
>
>
> diff
Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner
---
INSTALL.DPDK.md | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
It looks like a good time to promote DPDK support before
2.4 is branched off.
What do you think?
diff --git a/INSTALL.DPDK.md b/INSTALL.DPDK.md
index cdef6cf..a2d012e 100644
--- a/INSTALL.DPDK.md
++
11 matches
Mail list logo
