On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 06:48:20PM -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > Do you two have an opinion on this? If DPDK support is pretty solid now > > then it makes sense to apply this to master and backport it to > > branch-2.4. > > Personally I would like to have better testing with vhost, tunneling > and PMD thread management before removing experimental status. Once > that is done I will be more comfortable with it.
What kind of test are you looking for? Indeed, vhost and tunneling are fairly new, yes, but ethernet ports are being tested for the whole 2.3 cycle. My concern is that a new DPDK related feature would push that again. Perhaps come up with a table stating features X status? DPDK ports Stable DPDK vhost-cuse Experimental/Obsolete DPDK vhost-user Experimental DPDK ivshmem ... DPDK PMD management ... fbl _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
