On 6/25/15 12:39 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 06:48:20PM -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
Do you two have an opinion on this? If DPDK support is pretty solid now
then it makes sense to apply this to master and backport it to
branch-2.4.
Personally I would like to have better testing with vhost, tunneling
and PMD thread management before removing experimental status. Once
that is done I will be more comfortable with it.
What kind of test are you looking for? Indeed, vhost and tunneling
are fairly new, yes, but ethernet ports are being tested for the
whole 2.3 cycle.
My concern is that a new DPDK related feature would push that again.
Perhaps come up with a table stating features X status?
Flavio, This sounds like a practical approach toward additional testing
that will help move this forward. +1
DPDK ports Stable
DPDK vhost-cuse Experimental/Obsolete
DPDK vhost-user Experimental
DPDK ivshmem ...
DPDK PMD management ...
fbl
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
--
Thomas F. Herbert
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
