Hi Don
I edited by hand (because it was just one line on two files). I still don't
know how to patch.
Unfortunately it didn't solve the problem (see below)
Maybe this is related to issues in bootstrap? (which do not affect 42X
building) e.g.
ignoring commons-httpclient-3.1-src.tar.gz because
On 21 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don
>
> I edited by hand (because it was just one line on two files). I still don't
> know how to patch.
>
> Unfortunately it didn't solve the problem (see below)
>
> Maybe this is related to issues in bootstrap? (which do not affect 42X
> building) e.g.
>
>
On 21 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Am 21.08.20 um 00:09 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>> Hi Matthias and Jim,
>>
>> We need 4.1.8 to cherry pick openssl 1.0.1 from 4.2.
>
> Isn't it 1.0.2t?
>
> But I am not a developer, simple cherry-picking did not work for me...
>
> BTW: For 1.0.2t we ne
Hi Don,
Can you open a Pull Request on GitHub with the patch to upgrade OpenSSL?
I can test it on Windows with 4.1.8.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 21.08.20 um 18:10 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 21 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Am 21.08.20 um 00:09 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>> Hi Matthias and
Hi Don
> Hmn, I don't know about the extras failure, but all of the other errors
> are failures to build various third party packages that we bundle. This
> should be independent of the CXXFLAGS issue. More of the output of
> build --from python
> might be informative.
Did a Dmake clean and th
DonLewisFreeBSD opened a new pull request #92:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/92
Upgrade to openssl-1.0.2t.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
On 21 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Can you open a Pull Request on GitHub with the patch to upgrade OpenSSL?
>
> I can test it on Windows with 4.1.8.
Pull request created.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@
On 21 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don
>
>> Hmn, I don't know about the extras failure, but all of the other errors
>> are failures to build various third party packages that we bundle. This
>> should be independent of the CXXFLAGS issue. More of the output of
>> build --from python
>> might be
Hi Don,
Am 21.08.20 um 21:10 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 21 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Can you open a Pull Request on GitHub with the patch to upgrade OpenSSL?
>>
>> I can test it on Windows with 4.1.8.
> Pull request created.
Thanks!
I will do a Windows build and see if the online
On 21 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 21 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Am 21.08.20 um 00:09 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>> Hi Matthias and Jim,
>>>
>>> We need 4.1.8 to cherry pick openssl 1.0.1 from 4.2.
>>
>> Isn't it 1.0.2t?
>>
>> But I am not a developer, simple cherry-picking did not w
Well something strange is happening. Infra got me counts from the web logs on
the update check service for the past 30 days.
Here is the report - not everything is stopped.
FreeBSD563
OpenOffice 4.1.6162
OpenOffice 4.1.7401
Linux 1926
OpenOffice 4.0.195
OpenOf
On 8/11/2020 1:51 PM, Nicola Kamper wrote:
> Hello,
> I have enjoyed Apache Open Office, and am grateful for the work that you
> do. I am an experienced Tech Writer and interested in volunteering some of
> my time and effort to your organization. Please let me know what your needs
> are in this are
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #92:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/92#issuecomment-678517434
Shouldn't that be 1.0.2t in /main/openssl/version.mk?
(The same applies to trunks and AOO42X)
This is a
Pilot-Pirx edited a comment on pull request #92:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/92#issuecomment-678517434
Shouldn't that be 1.0.2t in /main/openssl/version.mk?
(The same applies to trunk and AOO42X)
Thi
On 21 Aug, GitBox wrote:
>
> Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #92:
> URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/92#issuecomment-678517434
>
>
>Shouldn't that be 1.0.2t in /main/openssl/version.mk?
>(The same applies to trunks and AOO42X)
Probably if it's actually used anywhere.
Am 21.08.20 um 23:55 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 21 Aug, GitBox wrote:
>> Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #92:
>> URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/92#issuecomment-678517434
>>
>>
>>Shouldn't that be 1.0.2t in /main/openssl/version.mk?
>>(The same applies to trunks and AOO42X)
Surprising numbers!
Regarding FreeBSD:
Does it make sense to check for updates?
The OS/2 version is being built with --disable-online-update. That
removes the entry in the menu and the options page.
Regards,
Matthias
BTW: We have still about 1,5 million downloads in a month.
Am 21.08.20 um
On 22 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 21.08.20 um 23:55 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 21 Aug, GitBox wrote:
>>> Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #92:
>>> URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/92#issuecomment-678517434
>>>
>>>
>>>Shouldn't that be 1.0.2t in /main/openssl/version.mk?
>>>
On 21 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 22 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 21.08.20 um 23:55 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> On 21 Aug, GitBox wrote:
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #92:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/92#issuecomment-678517434
Shouldn't that be 1.
19 matches
Mail list logo
