On 22 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 21.08.20 um 23:55 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 21 Aug, GitBox wrote: >>> Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #92: >>> URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/92#issuecomment-678517434 >>> >>> >>> Shouldn't that be 1.0.2t in /main/openssl/version.mk? >>> (The same applies to trunks and AOO42X) >> Probably if it's actually used anywhere. > > It was updated to 1.0.2h in the first step. > When updating to 1.0.2p and then to 1.0.2t the file was somehow forgotten. > > I don't think that it is really used but just for conformity it should > reflect the actual version. > > If there are no objections I would make the changes...
I'm wondering if version.mk is even included anywhere. It gets delivered, so that would need to be fixed as well if we delete it the file. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
