On 2016-10-05, 12:48 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
Is this approved or not approved as a release blocker???
I thought there was a fix for this.
It is essential that this is fixed for Mac users.
As I understand it, the reason is lack of testing and, as explained by Ariel, syste
On 10/5/2016 2:32 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2016-10-05, 12:48 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
Is this approved or not approved as a release blocker???
I thought there was a fix for this.
It is essential that this is fixed for Mac users.
As I understand it, the reason is lack o
Sorry for highjacking this thread...
I would like to promote some issues as release blocker for 4.1.4. The
issues are fixed in trunk and the code changes are minimal.
What would be the best way, as I see no possibility in my bugzilla-account?
regards
Matthias
Am 05.10.2016 um 00:23 schrieb Pa
On 2016-10-05, 3:40 AM Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 10/5/2016 2:32 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2016-10-05, 12:48 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
Is this approved or not approved as a release blocker???
I thought there was a fix for this.
It is essential that this is fixed for Ma
I cannot recreate the bug on my setup, which is 10.11 with Java 7 and 8
installed.
> On Oct 5, 2016, at 5:40 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
> On 10/5/2016 2:32 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
>> On 2016-10-05, 12:48 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>>> Larry Gusaas wrote:
Is this approved or not appro
Am 10/05/2016 12:24 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Sorry for highjacking this thread...
please don't. Just create a mail with new subject or at least change the
subject as I've done now.
I would like to promote some issues as release blocker for 4.1.4. The
issues are fixed in trunk and the co
Am 05.10.2016 um 12:59 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 10/05/2016 12:24 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Sorry for highjacking this thread...
>
> please don't. Just create a mail with new subject or at least change
> the subject as I've done now.
OK, I will do so in the future.
>
>> I would like to promote s
Am 10/05/2016 01:08 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 05.10.2016 um 12:59 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10/05/2016 12:24 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Sorry for highjacking this thread...
please don't. Just create a mail with new subject or at least change
the subject as I've done now.
OK, I will do so i
I plan to start the 4.1.3 vote today. This is a draft of the action list
assuming the vote passes. Please help by correcting, expanding, and
adding anything missing.
RM: Update
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3 to show
vote result etc.
RM: Edit
https://cwiki.ap
> -Original Message-
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 2:26 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Post vote release actions
>
> I plan to start the 4.1.3 vote today. This is a draft of the action list
> assuming
> the vote passes.
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
RM: Update
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3 to show
vote result etc.
The only important thing to update is that the release is available,
since the page stays archived.
RM: Edit
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4
Hi,
We would like to leverage openoffice base but have a few questions:
- Is there a limitation on how much data we can store in the
database(imposed by the database itself)? How many rows can we store per table,
etc...
- Is there a built in API to import xml data to the database?
The Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 source and binaries,
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/, contain
several bug fixes. See the draft release notes at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
Please vote on releasing it as 4.1.3 by replying
+1 Binding
Source testing: Checked signature and hashes. Checked that the three
source formats contain identical files. Built and tested en-US on
Windows 8.1
Binary testing: Tested en-GB binary on Windows 7, Windows 8.1, Windows
10, and Ubuntu 16.04. Also tested fr binary on Windows 8.1
On
Just a procedural Question. How can we be calling for a vote when there
are items in Bugzilla marked as release blockers that are not marked as
fixed?
Regards
Keith
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Can we open the AOO414 branch? Everything seems to show that 4.1.3 will
be coming in a week or so and for sure there is no further code work to
do on it. So I'd like to have an AOO414 branch where (once they are
approved) we can start merging changes. OpenOffice 4.1.4 is not going to
take anoth
On 04/10/2016 Mechtilde wrote:
Apache OpenOffice is a project with a wide user base, who only use the
binaries. So it is important to release well defined and tested binaries.
Yes, this is important. As we did for 4.1.2, I would leave PMC members
free to vote and specify what they have done. N
If you use the internal database, I believe that you are using HSQLDB.
I expect that this stores the entire DB in memory (not sure about that),
but if so, then you are memory limited.
If you use some other DB as the back-end and only use Base as the
front-end, then your limitations will be r
+1
Binary testing: Tested german (de) binary on Windows 8.1 (32bit), Ubuntu
16.04.1 (64bit) and Xubuntu 16.04.1 (32bit).
Am 05.10.2016 um 23:07 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
> The Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 source and binaries,
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/, contain
>
I believe, based on my tracking and testing, that the release blockers
are all fixed. I was hoping the people working on the bugs, especially
those who requested release_blocker, will update them ASAP.
On 10/5/2016 2:35 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Just a procedural Question. How can we be call
On 10/5/2016 2:52 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 04/10/2016 Mechtilde wrote:
Apache OpenOffice is a project with a wide user base, who only use the
binaries. So it is important to release well defined and tested binaries.
Yes, this is important. As we did for 4.1.2, I would leave PMC members
fr
They are now marked as fixed.
On 10/5/2016 3:28 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I believe, based on my tracking and testing, that the release blockers
are all fixed. I was hoping the people working on the bugs, especially
those who requested release_blocker, will update them ASAP.
On 10/5/2016 2:3
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> I believe, based on my tracking and testing, that the release blockers
> are all fixed. I was hoping the people working on the bugs, especially
> those who requested release_blocker, will update them ASAP.
>
I have no doubt that they have been fixed, but they need to be
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 07:17:27PM -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> > I believe, based on my tracking and testing, that the release blockers
> > are all fixed. I was hoping the people working on the bugs, especially
> > those who requested release_blocker, will update the
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 07:17:27PM -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>>> I believe, based on my tracking and testing, that the release blockers
>>> are all fixed. I was hoping the people working on the bugs, especially
>>> those who requested
On 10/5/2016 5:51 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 07:17:27PM -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I believe, based on my tracking and testing, that the release blockers
are all fixed. I was hoping the people working on the b
Howdy, Carsten-
As I was testing my build of ApacheOO 4.1.3, Enlightenment
0.21.99.21628 lock occurred again
< https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CuDUW33VIAA9ChB.jpg:large >
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 04:22:00 -0700 Jose R R said:
>
>> Thanks for r
Hello all,
I am trying to understand the Architecture of OO. And i have a bit
difficults to this. Mainly because I am Data Driven programmer (I suck
when i have to write a gui), and the approach taken seems a GUI driven one.
So from hat I understand is, that on the Low lever we have "Primiti
+1
Am 05.10.2016 um 23:07 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
> The Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 source and binaries,
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/, contain
> several bug fixes. See the draft release notes at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Relea
29 matches
Mail list logo
