On 12/3/13 6:05 PM, Armin Le Grand wrote:
> Hi Regina,
>
> On 02.12.2013 23:45, Regina Henschel wrote:
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>> Andrea Pescetti schrieb:
>>> On 26/11/2013 Regina Henschel wrote:
I have expanded the standard.soe with some arrow heads with hole. The
file is attached to
On 12/3/13 10:28 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 3 December 2013 21:12, jan i wrote:
>
>> I have (for ubuntu) tried to read through the policies which was a
>> nightmare.
>
>
> The first thing would be to get into Debian. I recall the steps there
> were set out (basically, have an install set that
On 12/4/13 1:04 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> 2013/12/3 Roberto Galoppini :
>> 2013/12/3 FR web forum :
A question for us is: How do we want to report misleading ads in the
future? Do we need any process on our side? Do we want to track the
reports in Bugzilla? Or do we want to
On 12/4/13 7:20 AM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
>
> On 12/03/2013 08:32 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
>> On 03.12.2013 13:02, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>> Additionally to this almost correct statement one could mention that
>>> isEmpty() is preferred over getLength()>0 and why.
>>
>> Yes, it is preferre
> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
> I have no problem to make this more public. If LO want to be
> independent
> they should not use our package names, binary names etc.
in fact, so you're absolutely right. I am a normal Linux user and the situation
on Linux is extremely co
On 04.12.2013 07:20, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
As Herbert said, this directly expresses what it checks. I would add
"and it reads better".
There are other reasons, however; for example, depending on the
implementation, it may be significantly faster than comparing against
the length. For on
I have just checked in what basically is a reimplementation of the
defunct support for creating patches on and for Windows.
Building OpenOffice without the new "release=t" flag should work like
before. If you don't plan to build patches then you can stop reading
now (just tell me if your buil
Hi Raymond,
Thanks for the information. Sorry about the PDF. Unfortunately, we are unable
to do a simple copy and paste because of the way are system is setup. The only
other option that I have is to type the output, but that would have taken much
longer.
Ok. I just wanted to make sure that
Hello,
Windows 7, Cygwin64 Terminal
With command:
$ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk aoo-trunk
Receive AOO upgrade Checked out revision 1547453.
Try to rebuild it with command:
$ build --all
build -- version: 275224
Have error messages in sal module:
=
Bu
On 04.12.2013 11:12, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 04.12.2013 07:20, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
As Herbert said, this directly expresses what it checks. I would add
"and it reads better".
There are other reasons, however; for example, depending on the
implementation, it may be significantly faste
Hi Raymond,
> Just to give you an update.
We were able compile debugbase.cxx by including
/opt/solarisstudios12.3/prod/include/CC/stlport4
Ah, please don't. Stlport4 is dead.
, but the next module wanted ../include/CC/Cstd. Then it went back and forth.
> There seems to be a disconnect
2013/12/4 Jürgen Schmidt :
> On 12/4/13 1:04 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
>> 2013/12/3 Roberto Galoppini :
>>> 2013/12/3 FR web forum :
> A question for us is: How do we want to report misleading ads in the
> future? Do we need any process on our side? Do we want to track the
> repo
Hi there
I have discovered that people receiving an attachment in Open Office, who
are using Microsoft Office 2007 cannot open my attachment. It indicates the
attachment is corrupted.
Is there any way around this ?
Thanks.
Ian Ogilvie
ian.ogilvie...@gmail.com
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:46:38 +
Ian Ogilvie wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I have discovered that people receiving an attachment in Open Office, who
> are using Microsoft Office 2007 cannot open my attachment. It indicates the
> attachment is corrupted.
> Is there any way around this ?
>
> Thanks.
>
Thanks Herbert. Do you have any idea why we would be receiving the following?
Compiling: sal/rtl/source/unload.cxx
"/usr/local/include/boost/unordered/detail/emplace_args.hpp", line 199:
Error:Could not find a match for
boost::tuples::get(constboost::tuples::tuple)
needed
inboost::unordered::d
Hi
I have created a database of my DVD collection. The creation of it was
fine, but there does not seem to be an option to print.
If it can be done, can you tell me how. I am running Windows 8
Regards
David McGhee
-
To unsu
Good afternoon,
I am working on a CGI IT UK Limited project called 'Galileo' on which we are
looking to export software. As part of this process, we need to know whether
Open Office is of United States origin, and if so what the ECCN number is, and
does an ENC licence also apply.
I would be mo
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> > From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
>
> > I have no problem to make this more public. If LO want to be
> > independent
> > they should not use our package names, binary names etc.
>
> in fact, so you're absolutely right. I am
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Trebilcock, Richard <
richard.trebilc...@cgi.com> wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
>
>
> I am working on a CGI IT UK Limited project called ‘Galileo’ on which we
> are looking to export software. As part of this process, we need to know
> whether Open Office is of Unite
On 04-Dec-2013, at 13:19, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>>> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
>>
>>> I have no problem to make this more public. If LO want to be
>>> independent
>>> they should not use our package names, binary nam
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=call_for_comments_apache_openoffice
This idea has been in my queue for a while. I'd like to push it out
now for public comment, and based on that try to get a new distributor
page set up by January.
-Rob
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Drew Jensen
> wrote:
>> Howdy Rob,
>>
>> Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la:
>> "IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications."
>>
>
> I've put in a r
On 12/4/2013 10:19 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
I have no problem to make this more public. If LO want to be
independent
they should not use our package names, binary names etc.
in fact, so you'r
On 4 December 2013 20:10, Andrew Rist wrote:
>
> On 12/4/2013 10:19 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Jörg Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>
>> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
I have no problem to make this more public. If LO want to be
independent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Weir wrote:
> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=call_for_comments_apache_openoffice
>
> This idea has been in my queue for a while. I'd like to push it
> out now for public comment, and based on that try to get a new
> distributo
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
> Change CDs to CD's.
>
Why?
Hello,
I am still struggling... Now I was trying to build libxmlsec and the
configuration parameters did not give the expected result. I had
to enter manually the following command
./configure ADDCFLAGS= CPPFLAGS= --with-pic --disable-shared
--disable-crypto-dl --with-libxslt=no --with-openssl=n
Kay Schenk wrote:
On SOME distros who handle this a little better/politely, the LO binary
has been renamed to "libreoffice", and a symlink from "soffice" to
libreoffice (/usr/bin/libreoffice --a custom packaging ) is supplied which
can easily be removed.
Actually, the official LibreOffice pa
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Keith N. McKenna
> wrote:
>
>> Change CDs to CD's.
>>
>
> Why?
OK. I've always wondered about this myself, so I looked it up. It
looks like there are various guidelines, but generally the aim is to
avoid con
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:49:43 -0500
Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Keith N. McKenna
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Change CDs to CD's.
> >>
> >
> > Why?
>
> OK. I've always wondered about this myself, so I looked it up. It
> look
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:05:08 +
Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:49:43 -0500
> Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Keith N. McKenna
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Change CDs to CD's.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Why?
Hi Juergen,
yes, of course we should add that stuff, that's what I had in mind. I already
have a grep on the task, just wanted to give some background information.
thanks go to regina for alwas bringing something forward!
--
ALG (iPad)
> Am 04.12.2013 um 09:07 schrieb Jürgen Schmidt :
>
>> On
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:05:08 +
> Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:49:43 -0500
> > Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Donald Whytock
> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Keith N. McKen
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:34 AM, dmcghee wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have created a database of my DVD collection. The creation of it was
> fine, but there does not seem to be an option to print.
>
> If it can be done, can you tell me how. I am running Windows 8
>
>
> Regards
> David McGhee
>
>
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:34 AM, dmcghee wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have created a database of my DVD collection. The creation of it was
> fine, but there does not seem to be an option to print.
>
> If it can be done, can you tell me how. I am running Windows 8
>
>
> Regards
> David McGhee
>
>
On 12/5/13 12:34 AM, Armin Le Grand wrote:
> Hi Juergen,
>
> yes, of course we should add that stuff, that's what I had in mind. I already
> have a grep on the task, just wanted to give some background information.
> thanks go to regina for alwas bringing something forward!
well I don't understa
37 matches
Mail list logo
