On 24.05.2013 00:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Jörg Schmidt wrote:
reflect together about a better name for "sidebar", maybe we can find
a better name.
Call it "OpenBar" then.
Open like OpenOffice. Bar like in Toolbar. And "Open Bar" like "get
everything you want for free". Oh well.
Everythi
On 23.05.2013 19:22, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi Jan,
Ariel is the expert here. But perhaps some sites help you, which I
have bookmarked:
https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitSvnCrashCourse
http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-sheet-take-two
http://utsl.gen.nz/talks/git-svn/intro.htm
On 5/24/13 9:19 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 23.05.2013 19:22, Regina Henschel wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> Ariel is the expert here. But perhaps some sites help you, which I
>> have bookmarked:
>> https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitSvnCrashCourse
>> http://jan-krueger.net/development/git-cheat-s
Hello,
> From: Andre Fischer [mailto:awf@gmail.com]
> > Open like OpenOffice. Bar like in Toolbar. And "Open Bar" like "get
> > everything you want for free". Oh well.
> >
> >> Everything You answer me, that's my suggestion is apparently
> >> uncomfortable.
> >
> > It isn't. You raised a p
> > I do see the need for good marketing
>
> ???
>
> I do not understand this statement.
i am so sorry
I had mistakenly read "dont" instead of "do"
Greetings,
Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.ap
On 5/24/13 9:47 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>>> I do see the need for good marketing
>>
>> ???
>>
>> I do not understand this statement.
>
> i am so sorry
>
> I had mistakenly read "dont" instead of "do"
>
I believe you put far too much weight in a name of an of course good
feature.
The sideb
I'm cutting previous quotes, as many of the arguments in them are not
immediately relevant to the question of a suuitable name.
I would argue against the use of "bar" in connection with the sidepanel. It is
not a bar in the normal understanding of the word in computing - a bar being
long and t
On 24.05.2013 09:34, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Andre Fischer [mailto:awf@gmail.com]
Open like OpenOffice. Bar like in Toolbar. And "Open Bar" like "get
everything you want for free". Oh well.
Everything You answer me, that's my suggestion is apparently
uncomfortable.
It isn't. Yo
We already have several extensions in the Repository (EuroOffice
extensions), but some weeks ago, as we tried to publish some new
extensions, we just couldn't find any "Publish" checkbox or button. We can
update our published extensions, the problem is only with the new ones.
Please let me know wh
Hi,
On 23.05.2013 09:19, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
I have seen that #621 of aoo-win7 also had this error and that you had
again cleaned up the hanging processes.
In order to get some error output I will switch off the HTML output (no
"--html" option) and the multiprocessor build
On 5/21/13 6:28 PM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I began developing using Apache Chemistry API today inorder to get used to
> it before GSoC. I have written some code. It has some runtime errors. Help
> me in correcting it.
>
> https://github.com/rajaths589/CMISTrial.git
>
Hi Ra
On 24 May 2013 09:33, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 5/24/13 9:19 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> > On 23.05.2013 19:22, Regina Henschel wrote:
> >> Hi Jan,
> >>
> >> Ariel is the expert here. But perhaps some sites help you, which I
> >> have bookmarked:
> >> https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitSvnC
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Herbert Dürr wrote:
> Just a heads up:
>
> We are using ooo-extras [1] as reliable mirror to the upstream locations of
> third party code with non-permissive licenses. Today's google opensource
> blog [2] says that this method will stop working in 2014. We need to
Hello Juergen,
I have mailed the Chemistry dev group as well.
The run-time error is probably caused due to wrong build configurations on
my eclipse.
There is nothing wrong with my code.
So, I'm trying to get it working!!
Thanks anyways.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
2013/5/24 Jürgen Schmidt :
> for me it looks more that we use svn for only practical reasons, it is
> the main repository system at the ASF. Some other projects have migrated
> to git already and use git for their normal work.
Me too.
> The whole discussion shows that we should think about a migr
Sorry about that, we have been under spam attack and we had to suspend
automatic publishing.
Please let us know your username and/or your links, and we'll activate
them right away.
Sorry for the incovenience it might have caused you.
Roberto
2013/5/24 Kázmér Koleszár :
> We already have several
Hi.
we are not alone in ASF wishing code signing, but we might get run over (as
I did today on IRC) if we do not formulate our requirements very clearly.
rgds
jan I.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Scott Deboy
Date: 24 May 2013 18:59
Subject: Re: Official code signing certificate
Hi
I tried to access the Pootle and returned the Sonar, at
https://analysis.apache.org/. Is correct it?
Bests,
Claudio
2013/5/23 janI :
> Hi.
>
> We have to take pootle down for about 2 hours due to a urgently needed
> maintenance, sorry for the short warning.
>
> Downtime is expected to be: UTC
Den 24/05/2013 20.06 skrev "Claudio Filho" :
>
> Hi
>
> I tried to access the Pootle and returned the Sonar, at
> https://analysis.apache.org/. Is correct it
refresh the page. it is because your cached an old version.
we changed the pottle technical setup yesterday.
rgds
Jan i
>
> Bests,
> Claudi
2013/5/24 jan iversen :
> refresh the page. it is because your cached an old version.
> we changed the pottle technical setup yesterday.
Thanks, Jan. The problem is my (corporative) proxy. :-(
But is fine with my 3G connection. Thanks!
Claudio
---
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:50 PM, janI wrote:
> Hi.
>
> we are not alone in ASF wishing code signing, but we might get run over (as
> I did today on IRC) if we do not formulate our requirements very clearly.
>
Can you give us a better sense of what part of AOO code signing is
unclear to Infra? We
Am Freitag, 24. Mai 2013 um 19:50 schrieb janI:
> Hi.
>
> we are not alone in ASF wishing code signing, but we might get run over (as
> I did today on IRC) if we do not formulate our requirements very clearly.
>
>
decisions are made on mailing lists, correct? That is what I learned at Apache
On 24 May 2013 22:30, Juergen Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> Am Freitag, 24. Mai 2013 um 19:50 schrieb janI:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > we are not alone in ASF wishing code signing, but we might get run over
> (as
> > I did today on IRC) if we do not formulate our requirements very clearly.
> >
> >
>
> decisions ar
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:01 PM, janI wrote:
> On 24 May 2013 22:30, Juergen Schmidt wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am Freitag, 24. Mai 2013 um 19:50 schrieb janI:
>>
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> > we are not alone in ASF wishing code signing, but we might get run over
>> (as
>> > I did today on IRC) if we do not formula
And I should mention that pushing the code signing side is probably
premature until we have the build side more solidly automated.
Every discussion we have had code signing led to the conclusion that
if something is signed it must come from a trusted build traceable to
an SVN revision. So the pre
Hi Rob,
This is a very well written summary of the situation with Code Signing.
The main concern that the ASF has with digitally signing with a singular
apache.org certificate for the whole foundation is keeping it in strict
control. For some this means physical machines. This is a high bar.
I
26 matches
Mail list logo
